536 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Budget Allocation & ROI Projector. Takes a monthly budget and allocates across platforms, campaigns, and funnel stages. Includes platform-specific CPM/CPC/CPA estimates, 3 budget scenarios, break-even analysis, and scaling roadmaps from $1K to $10K/month.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix Monte Carlo project completion simulations that give identical dates for all sub-groups (milestones, priorities, epics). Use when: (1) All sub-group predictions converge to the same date despite different remaining counts, (2) Proportional throughput scaling produces flat/identical results, (3) Applying overall scope rate to individual sub-groups causes simulations to hit max_weeks cap and never converge, (4) Building project forecasting tools that predict completion for sub-groups of a larger backlog. Covers hypergeometric draw model for milestones and cumulative priority model for sequential priorities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements real-time WebSocket communication with connection management, room-based messaging, and horizontal scaling. Use when building chat systems, live notifications, collaborative tools, or real-time dashboards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Health check endpoints for liveness, readiness, dependency monitoring. Use for Kubernetes, load balancers, auto-scaling, or encountering probe failures, startup delays, dependency checks, timeout configuration errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy, manage, and scale applications on Kubernetes clusters using manifests, Helm charts, and autoscaling configurations. Use when the user requests kubernetes deployment or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Heat Transfer Engineer. Use when a task calls for Heat Transfer Engineer judgment. Reasons from conduction, convection, radiation, and coupled fluid-solid physics through thermal resistance networks, Biot/NTU/film-temperature scaling, LMTD and epsilon-NTU exchanger methods, fin efficiency, and conjugate-heat-transfer CFD while treating contact resistance and TIM pump-out, fouling, boiling CHF, non-condensables, and non-conservative interface flux mapping as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert High-Performance Computing Specialist. Use when a task calls for High-Performance Computing Specialist judgment. Reasons from NUMA topology and hybrid MPI+OpenMP+CUDA decomposition through Slurm fairshare/backfill job design, strong/weak scaling (Amdahl/Gustafson), Darshan/mpiP/Nsight profiling, and parallel HDF5/MPI-IO on Lustre while treating I/O storms, collectives bottlenecks, and rank-binding mistakes as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Electromagnetics Engineer. Use when a task calls for Electromagnetics Engineer judgment. Reasons from Maxwell scaling and S-parameters through HFSS/CST/ADS workflows, SOLT/TRL calibration, mesh ΔS convergence, Smith-chart matching, anechoic OTA, and CISPR/FCC Part 15 / IEC-IEEE 62209-1528 SAR compliance while treating PML reflections, probe de-embedding, and chamber ripple as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Fluid Dynamicist. Use when a task calls for Fluid Dynamicist judgment. Reasons from Navier–Stokes and dimensionless scaling through RANS/LES/DNS selection, mesh/y+ strategy, OpenFOAM/Fluent workflows, and MMS + ASME V&V 20 / PIV validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Computational Physicist. Use when a task calls for Computational Physicist judgment. Reasons from governing equations, discretization, and HPC scaling through code/solution verification, DFT, MD, Monte Carlo, and FEM/FVM workflows (VASP, LAMMPS, COMSOL, OpenFOAM, QE).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Crystallographer. Use when a task calls for Crystallographer judgment. Reasons from reciprocal-space diffraction data, Bragg's law, and space-group symmetry through XDS/DIALS scaling, Phaser/SHELX phasing, Coot/Olex2 building, and MolProbity/checkCIF validation while treating merohedral twinning, wrong space groups, model-bias density unsupported by omit/polder maps, and R_free overfitting as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Deep Learning Scientist. Use when a task calls for Deep Learning Scientist judgment. Reasons from CNN/Transformer inductive bias, Li et al. loss landscapes, grokking/mode connectivity, and Kaplan/Chinchilla scaling (~20 tokens/param); designs ResNet/ViT/DiT/MoE/FlashAttention stacks with FLOPs-matched ablations; trains AdamW+cosine/WSD via Megatron-FSDP/DeepSpeed; evaluates FID/MMLU-Pro/MMLU-CF with lm-eval decontamination and Pineau/NeurIPS reproducibility checklists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Earthquake Engineer. Use when a task calls for Earthquake Engineer judgment. Reasons from ASCE 7 DRS and SDC, capacity design (R, Cd, Ω₀), ELF/MRS/NRHA and ASCE 41 pushover; models in SAP2000/ETABS/OpenSees with PEER NGA-West2 motions; treats liquefaction, soft-story P-delta collapse, and record-scaling artifacts as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Applied Mathematician. Use when a task calls for Applied Mathematician judgment. Reasons from formulation-first modeling, Buckingham scaling, and asymptotics (matched expansions, boundary layers) through FEM/FVM numerics (FEniCS, PETSc, LAPACK), Tikhonov inverse problems, and ASME/Sandia V&V while treating ill-posed inversion, stiffness, and numerical diffusion as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when enhancing, upscaling, restoring, denoising, sharpening, deinterlacing, stabilizing, motion-deblurring, colorizing, SDR-to-HDR converting, or frame-rate/slow-motion converting video (and secondarily images) with Topaz Labs — whether cleaning up AI-generated video, compressed UGC, or old archival footage, or building a generate-low-res-then-upscale delivery pipeline. Covers choosing the right named Topaz model for a specific footage problem, setting parameters, driving the Topaz Platform (Video/Image) REST API's async job lifecycle, judging when enhancement helps versus when it introduces artifacts (over-smoothing, temporal shimmer, face hallucination), and QA of enhanced output. Do not use for originating new video content, non-Topaz upscalers, or purely editorial cuts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when an agent needs AssemblyAI for speech-to-text or speech-understanding work in media production, including pre-recorded, synchronous short-file, and real-time streaming transcription; speaker diarization or speaker identification; captions and subtitles; timestamps; language detection, code-switching, or transcript translation; audio intelligence such as summaries, chapters, topics, entities, key phrases, sentiment, content moderation, profanity filtering, and PII redaction; webhooks, scaling, rate limits, retention, security, consent, and QA for podcasts, interviews, captions, call recordings, and edit workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provider-independent FFmpeg finishing workflow for AI agents preparing generated or edited media deliverables. Use when finalizing images, image sequences, video, audio, captions, overlays, social/export variants, checksums, manifests, delivery specs, and QA with ffmpeg/ffprobe, including transcode versus stream-copy decisions, scaling, frame-rate handling, color metadata caution, loudness normalization, subtitle burn-in or sidecars, concat/trim, GIFs, batch variants, and reproducible command reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build forest plots (HR, OR, RR, beta-coefficient summaries with CIs) and funnel plots (meta-analysis publication-bias diagnostics) using forestplot, metafor, ggforest, and MendelianRandomization with proper axis-scaling, summary-diamond placement, subgroup nesting, and Egger / trim-and-fill asymmetry tests. Use when summarizing effects across subgroups, trials, or instruments — meta-analysis, Mendelian randomization, subgroup HRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes CUT&RUN (Skene Henikoff 2017) and CUT&Tag (Kaya-Okur 2019) chromatin profiling data. Handles SEACR vs MACS2 peak calling (with the btaf375 2025 benchmark guidance), pA-MNase vs pA-Tn5 vs pAG-Tn5 chimera differences, E. coli spike-in carryover normalization, IgG-only control logic (no input), characteristic fragment-size signatures (25-75 bp for CUT&Tag), and lower depth requirements (5M reads typical vs 25M for ChIP). Use when calling peaks from CUT&RUN/CUT&Tag, scaling by E. coli spike-in carryover, choosing SEACR norm mode, or comparing CUT&RUN/Tag results to traditional ChIP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies differentially bound ChIP-seq regions between conditions using DiffBind, csaw (sliding windows), DESeq2/edgeR/PyDESeq2 on count matrices, NormR (control-aware), or MAnorm2. Distinguishes three distinct normalization problems (composition bias, trended bias, global shifts) and matches each to its appropriate fix including spike-in scaling. Use when comparing ChIP-seq binding between experimental conditions, choosing normalization for global vs local changes, integrating spike-in data, or reconciling DiffBind/DESeq2 disagreement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and analyzes combinatorial CRISPR screens covering paired-Cas9 (Big Papi, Najm 2018), enhanced AsCas12a multiplex (enCas12a, DeWeirdt 2021), in4mer 4-guide-array Cas12a (Esmaeili Anvar N et al 2024 Nat Commun 15:3577) and the Inzolia paralog-pair library, paralog-buffering detection (Dede 2020 Genome Biol; Thompson 2021 Cell Reports 36:109597), genetic-interaction (GI) scoring as observed_double_LFC minus expected_additive_double_LFC, synthetic-lethal and synthetic-rescue interaction interpretation, the half-of-essentiality buffered by paralogs phenomenon, multiplex screen statistical analysis with MAGeCK MLE interaction terms, and the relationship to single-cell combinatorial Perturb-seq. Use when designing a paralog or pathway-pair screen, choosing between paired-Cas9 (Big Papi) and Cas12a multiplex (Inzolia), interpreting genetic interaction scores, identifying synthetic-lethal targets for drug development, or scaling beyond single-gene CRISPR screens.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a multi-quarter QA strategy document. Covers scope, risk-based prioritization, test levels (unit/integration/E2E), pyramid analysis, entry/exit criteria, quality KPIs, tool selection rationale, CI scaling levers, and timeline planning. Output is an actionable strategy document, not a shelf document. Use when: "test strategy," "QA strategy doc," "testing approach," "QA roadmap," "multi-quarter QA direction." Not for: a single-sprint or single-release plan — use test-planning. Not for: identifying which areas carry the most risk — use risk-based-testing first. Related: risk-based-testing, qa-metrics, release-readiness, test-planning, test-reliability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Node-based graphical interface for Stable Diffusion workflows. Build complex image generation pipelines by connecting nodes visually. Supports custom nodes, ControlNet, LoRA, upscaling, and advanced workflows with full control over the diffusion process.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are an expert in AWS Lambda, Amazon's serverless compute service. You help developers build event-driven applications using Lambda functions triggered by API Gateway, S3 events, SQS queues, DynamoDB streams, and scheduled events — with support for Node.js, Python, Go, Rust, Java, and container images, automatic scaling from zero to thousands of concurrent executions, and pay-per-invocation pricing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。