「signing」の検索結果

Comprehensive offensive methodology for software supply chain attacks covering the full kill chain from reconnaissance through exploitation. Addresses dependency confusion across npm, PyPI, and NuGet ecosystems where internal registry override allows an attacker to inject malicious packages that shadow private dependencies. Covers typosquatting techniques for popular packages, compromised package injection via maintainer account takeover or social engineering, and build system attacks through Makefile injection, setup.py install hooks, and npm postinstall scripts. Extends into CI/CD artifact tampering where build outputs are replaced or modified in transit, code signing abuse through stolen or self-signed certificates, upstream repository compromise via commit injection or force-push to trusted repos, and container image supply chain attacks including base image trojaning and registry confusion. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.001 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools) and T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Integrates tooling such as confused for dependency confusion scanning and dependency-check for known vulnerable component detection. Each technique section provides reproducible proof-of-concept patterns, detection guidance for defenders, and engagement-safe execution notes for authorized red team operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen existing protein binders with Boltz. Use when ranking a supplied protein, peptide, antibody, nanobody, or binder library against a target. Not for designing new proteins or screening small molecules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reasoning about what survives compaction/context-loss/restart/seat-refresh, designing a high-fidelity restore packet, or distinguishing native runtime resume vs fork vs artifact-backed mental-model rebuild. Covers the 4 failure modes that prevent honest restore (compacted seat drops hot potato; restore packet preserves details but loses product intent; runtime resume mistaken for handover or fork; rebuilt seat starts with stale instructions).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when changing OpenRig's own source in a clone of the openrig repository: finding which package or file owns a behaviour, choosing which tests to run, testing a change without disturbing the OpenRig daemon your own session runs on, judging whether a diff touches a high-risk area, or preparing a pull request. Not for operating rigs (openrig-skills) or designing rig topologies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing multi-agent topologies that run ON OpenRig — authoring RigSpec and AgentSpec files for new rigs, creating agent startup content (guidance / skills / culture), or diagnosing why a launched rig's agents aren't behaving as intended. NOT for changing OpenRig itself (use developing-openrig); NOT for ordinary CLI operation of an existing rig (use openrig-user). Covers the full authoring lifecycle from user intent to validated, launchable rig.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reasoning about the rig lifecycle operations family (create / start / stop / resume / restore / snapshot / release / unclaim / destroy), reading or trusting `rig ps` / lifecycle projections after recovery, or designing proof for a lifecycle scenario. Covers the 4 failure modes (auto-restore creates partial rig; projections report healthier than reality; provider auth treated as impl work; resume succeeds for one runtime fails another) plus the restore-honesty rule (failed resume is FAILED loudly — no auto fresh fallback).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, reviewing, or debugging how an agent's context window gets filled, pruned, or shared — choosing what loads at boot versus on demand, sizing an install or an always-loaded file, fixing an agent that drifts, repeats itself, or forgets constraints mid-task, planning compaction or summarization, deciding single-agent versus subagents, engineering handoffs between agents, or picking a tool loadout. NOT for rewording a prompt's tone, choosing which model to pin, or debugging business logic — those are adjacent moments this skill does not serve. Historical 2024–2025 snapshot; not normative for present-day frontier models — see the Status section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, building, operating, or diagnosing an ongoing application whose live backend or control loop includes OpenRig agents, including applications with a Markdown, YAML, or JSON agent control plane or a thin surface over specialist agent roles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or auditing how an agent becomes useful after launch — AGENTS.md overlays, role files, skills, rig specs, workflow specs, startup checklists, refocus messages, "rig context" surface. Covers the 4 failure modes that make startup context fail (old rig spec misses current operating mode; current agents never told about new guidance; startup file as dumping ground; orchestrator transmits implementation without preserving product intent).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when classifying a slice closeout (auto-continue / human gate / park), routing a real decision to a human, or designing a human queue/dashboard surface. Treats humans as durable network participants with attention surfaces, queues, and decision records — escalation lands as a durable attention item, not a chat message. Approval is NOT required for every clean closeout; the default RSI conveyor continues unless an explicit human gate is reached.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authoring rig specs, agent specs, workflow specs, startup/context fragments, operating-mode declarations, or designing the user spec library. Covers the 4 failure modes (spec instantiates topology but not workflow/mode; spec depends on local paths and fails on another host; agents modify specs as one-off files instead of preserving reusable intent; validation proves YAML shape but not whether topology can run) and the validation-vs-runtime-realization distinction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides design and implementation of evolutionary modular-monolith platforms with DDD (strategic + tactical), flat-by-aggregate organization, an Anti-Corruption Layer for vendor independence, a transactional outbox for events, smart resilience (backoff with jitter, circuit breakers, idempotency), and a polished architecture HTML document with elegant SVG diagrams. Use when designing a platform or backend, defining bounded contexts, organizing modules and folders, choosing monolith vs microservices, decoupling from an external service (ERP, storage, AI), making calls resilient, adding real-time push, picking a 2026 TypeScript stack (Nx, NestJS, React), or producing an architecture document or diagram. Also triggers on 'modular monolith', 'bounded contexts', 'flat-by-aggregate', 'ports and adapters', 'architecture diagram'. Do NOT use for simple CRUD, NestJS-only deep implementation (use nestjs-modular-monolith), or pure domain-model review (use tactical-ddd).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opinionated Rails conventions: rich models, concerns, CRUD-everything, state-as-records, minimal dependencies, Minitest with fixtures. Load this skill BEFORE any code-level thinking, not only before editing a file. It is required the moment a task touches Rails code in ANY way: designing or even just discussing a data model, schema, migration, entity, association, field, validation, class, or method name; writing, planning, reviewing, analyzing, testing, debugging, or refactoring; or proposing any model, table, column, route, or code snippet inline in chat. If you are about to name a model or sketch a column you are already in scope, even in an exploratory back-and-forth where no file is written yet. Do not let a "we're just discussing" framing defer it. Do NOT use for non-Rails backends, NestJS, or general architecture (use nestjs-modular-monolith or coding-guidelines).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technology-agnostic guidance for modular systems: bounded contexts, clear boundaries, composability, state isolation, explicit contracts, failure containment, scaffolding workflows, split/merge criteria, sub-units inside a context, and compliance review signals. Use when designing or reviewing module structure, service boundaries, package layout, cross-cutting dependencies, "how should we split this?", modularity assessments, coupling between domains, greenfield context design, or architecture discussions without assuming a specific framework, language, or repository layout. Do NOT use for executing the full Patterns 1–5 repo decomposition pipeline or per-pattern inventories (use modular-decomposition), phased extraction roadmaps as the main deliverable (use decomposition-planning-roadmap), or end-to-end legacy migration strategy (use legacy-migration-planner).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React composition patterns that scale. Use when refactoring components with boolean prop proliferation, building flexible component libraries, or designing reusable APIs. Triggers on tasks involving compound components, render props, context providers, or component architecture. Includes React 19 API changes. Do NOT use for React/Next.js performance optimization (use react-best-practices instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for designing and building high-quality skills from scratch through structured conversation. Use when someone wants to create a new skill, build a skill, design a skill, or asks for help making Agents do something consistently. Also use when someone says "turn this into a skill", "I want to automate this workflow", "how do I teach my Agent to do X", or mentions creating SKILL.md files. Covers standalone skills and MCP-enhanced workflows. Do NOT use for creating subagents (use subagent-creator) or technical design documents (use create-technical-design-doc).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing/implementing UI with Tailwind CSS (layout, typography, responsive, theming, component patterns). Includes quick recipes and conventions for clean, consistent web design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or rewriting a high-converting SaaS pricing page (structure, plan design, copywriting, SEO/AEO, FAQs, layout patterns, experiments). Includes checklists, templates, and common pitfalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or rewriting a high-converting landing page (single-offer page) for SaaS/apps/services. Covers structure, layout patterns, conversion strategies, copywriting, SEO/AEO, and common pitfalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or implementing product-grade web motion like Stripe, Linear, Apple, and Vercel. Covers motion principles, easing/duration defaults, choreography patterns, scroll/hover interactions, performance, accessibility (reduced motion), and implementation guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TypeScript library for NEAR Protocol blockchain interaction. Use this skill when writing code that interacts with NEAR Protocol, including viewing contract data, calling contract methods, sending NEAR tokens, building transactions, creating type-safe contract wrappers, integrating wallets (Wallet Selector, HOT Connect), React hooks and providers (@near-kit/react), managing keys, testing with sandbox, meta-transactions (NEP-366), and message signing (NEP-413).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OKX Agentic Wallet — the single skill for the user's wallet and on-chain execution. Use it whenever the user wants to operate their wallet or execute an on-chain action, including: login & accounts, balance / holdings, wallet address / deposit / receive, send / transfer, contract calls (approve / deposit / withdraw), transaction history & status, message signing, wallet export & policy; pay gas with a stablecoin (Gas Station, Solana); swap / trade / buy / sell / convert, get a quote; cross-chain bridge & track arrival; limit orders (buy dip / take profit / stop loss / buy above) plus cancel / list / resume them; broadcast / gas / simulate / track a transaction; look up any public address's holdings; security scanning (token / honeypot 蜜罐 / 貔貅, DApp phishing, tx & signature checks, approvals); audit log. Once matched, follow this skill's Intent Routing to dispatch to the exact action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build NEAR Protocol dApps. Use for: (1) creating new NEAR dApps with `create-near-app` (Vite+React, Next.js), (2) adding NEAR wallet connection to existing apps with `@hot-labs/near-connect` and `near-connect-hooks`, (3) building frontend UI for NEAR smart contracts, (4) integrating wallet sign-in/sign-out, contract calls, and transaction signing into web applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Crypto wallet operations via the awal CLI — sign in, check balances, send USDC/ETH/POL/SOL, trade tokens, fund the wallet, and use the x402 payment protocol to discover paid services, pay for API calls, monetize an API, or query onchain data. Use whenever the user mentions signing in, login, authentication, wallet status, balance, address, sending money, paying someone, transferring tokens, ENS names, swapping/trading/converting tokens, funding/topping up/onramp, USDC, ETH, POL, SOL, the x402 bazaar, paid APIs, monetizing an endpoint, or querying onchain data on Base.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。