「structural」の検索結果

Deep behavioral audit of a Lattice skill — proposes 3 review personas relevant to the skill, runs independent scenario analysis from each persona's perspective, then merges only the high-confidence, practical findings into a severity-ordered gap report with proposed fixes. Structural validation (conventions, cross-references) is skill-validate's job — this skill finds gaps that would realistically surface when someone actually uses the skill: missing scenario handling, ambiguous instructions, silent failure cases, and behavioral inconsistencies. Filters out theoretical edge cases, low-likelihood speculation, and findings owned by other skills. Use after writing or significantly changing any skill, or when the user says 'review this skill', 'deep review', 'does this skill work', 'find gaps in this skill', 'stress test this skill', 'review from different angles', or 'skill review'. Standalone — does not call other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate any Lattice SKILL.md against all tier conventions — atoms, molecules, and refiners. Catches structural errors, broken cross-references, and convention violations before they reach the repo. If you just wrote or modified a Lattice skill file and haven't run this yet, run it now — manual review consistently misses the same categories of errors this skill is specifically designed to catch. Use when the user says 'validate this skill', 'check this skill', 'does this follow conventions', 'review this skill file', 'check my SKILL.md', or 'skill validate'. Reports PASS/FAIL with specific file-and-section findings and actionable fixes. Standalone — does not call other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify, categorize, and prioritize accumulated design inconsistencies and structural problems across a product.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enterprise BPMN 2.0 diagram generator — converts natural language process descriptions into OMG-compliant BPMN 2.0 XML files and SVG previews via a 4-phase pipeline: Intent Extraction (LLM → JSON Logic-Core) → Validation (deadlock detection, structural soundness) → ElkJS Auto-Layout → BPMN XML + SVG output. Supports: multi-pool collaborations, message flows, boundary events (timer/error/signal), loop/multi-instance markers, data objects, all gateway types with correct gatewayDirection, and all BPMN 2.0 task types. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, generate, or model a BPMN diagram, process flow, or workflow — even if they say "draw a process", "model this workflow", "make a BPMN for...", "create a Prozessmodell", "visualize this process", or describe a business process in natural language. Also use for editing or extending existing BPMN Logic-Core JSON.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CustomShader authoring — vertexShaderText and fragmentShaderText against VertexInput, FragmentInput, FeatureIds, Metadata, czm_modelMaterial. Use when reading EXT_mesh_features or EXT_structural_metadata property textures/tables, vertex displacement, or shading VoxelPrimitive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the konsistent CLI, review all reported violations, and fix them in the codebase. Use when the user wants to "fix konsistent violations", "resolve konsistent errors", "clean up konsistent diagnostics", "make konsistent pass", "address structural convention violations", or asks to run konsistent and act on the results. The skill is interactive: it requires explicit user decisions when many violations stem from the same rule (rule vs. code question), explicit user confirmation before modifying any code, and a triage step for non-trivial violations. For editing `konsistent.json`, this skill defers to the `konsistent-config` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for the architecture phases of an MBSE workflow in MATLAB, when writing idempotent buildXxx.m scripts that produce a three-layer RFLPV architecture (Functional, Logical, Physical) with interface dictionaries, stereotype profiles, allocation sets, and requirements Implement links. Trigger for defining stereotype properties, functional-to-logical / logical-to-physical allocation, mapping requirements to components via slreq Implement links, or running quantitative roll-up analysis on the architecture. Do NOT trigger for ad-hoc structural edits to an already-built System Composer model (adding one component, rewiring a port) — use `building-simulink-models` with `model_edit` for that. Works alongside the `system-composer` skill for detailed SC API patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when authoring reusable, idempotent MATLAB scripts that build System Composer architecture models via the architecture-modeling API — `systemcomposer.createModel`, `addComponent`, `addPort`, `setInterface`, `connect(srcPort, dstPort)`, interface dictionaries (.sldd) with `addInterface`/`addElement`, profiles/stereotypes with `Profile.createProfile` and `addStereotype`, or `systemcomposer.allocation.createAllocationSet`. Also trigger when debugging these APIs (connections that don't appear, interfaces that don't resolve, profile save errors, `createAllocationSet` signature-mismatch errors). Do NOT trigger for ad-hoc structural edits to an already-built model (adding one SubSystem, rewiring a port) — use `building-simulink-models` with `model_edit` for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when concurrent actors might write to the same file, branch, key, or state object. Eliminate the sharing first; serialize structurally only when one shared writer is a real invariant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Causal inference specialist for causal discovery, counterfactual reasoning, and effect estimationUse when "causal inference, causal discovery, counterfactual, intervention effect, confounder, structural causal model, SCM, dowhy, causal graph, causal, dowhy, scm, dag, counterfactual, intervention, causalnex, confounding, ml-memory" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the vault for structural issues: unresolved wikilinks, orphan notes, dead-end notes, and Obsidian sync conflicts. Optional --fix flags create stubs or surface fixable issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull structural updates from upstream ObsidianOS into the local vault.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Google and Meta paid media account structure evaluation. Audits campaign/ad set architecture against conversion volume minimums, budget thresholds, and targeting overlap. Identifies over-segmentation, under-segmentation, budget fragmentation, and structural anti-patterns blocking algorithmic learning. Provides consolidation roadmaps with migration plans. Use when inheriting accounts, quarterly health checks, or before scaling budgets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open a GitHub PR via API as a flowing graph — branch + push + create_pr + mergeable poll, with structural protection against pushing to main/master/etc. Use when a Claude Code or Claude.ai container needs to land changes on GitHub via the API (no git CLI required) and the prose "create branch, push, open PR, wait for mergeable" workflow keeps drifting under context pressure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate hierarchical _FEATURES.md files that describe what a codebase DOES from a user/consumer perspective, anchored to source symbols via tree-sitting. Supports large complex codebases through feature-driven decomposition into sub-feature files. Uses a multi-pass synthesis: orientation → detail → overview rewrite. Use when someone says "what does this do", "document features", "feature inventory", "_FEATURES.md", or needs to understand a codebase's purpose before modifying it. Complements tree-sitting (structural) with semantic (why/what-for) layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

First-encounter orientation on a repository nobody here has worked in yet. Runs a fixed five-step workflow — venv setup, tarball fetch, tree-sitting structural scan, featuring synthesis, then reasoning over the two — and yields an account of what the repo contains and how it is arranged, optionally written out as _FEATURES.md. Use for "I just cloned this", "what is this repo", "what does this do", "explore this repo", "give me an orientation", "what are the main features", "review what's new in this repo", or before starting work in a codebase you have not seen. This is the divergent what's-here skill. Route elsewhere for: a named symbol, a file's structure or a line range (tree-sitting); all callers of a Python symbol (searching-codebases); teaching a human the codebase through exercises (orienting-codebases); fetching or cloning a repo without analysing it (accessing-github-repos, cloning-project).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The lifecycle gate for a local Codespace-equivalent sandbox. Routed to when the user invokes /ca-sandbox:sandbox to pull an untrusted repo into an ephemeral, host-FS-isolated Docker container, or any of the interaction commands (/ca-sandbox:sandbox-shell, /ca-sandbox:sandbox-exec, /ca-sandbox:sandbox-cp, /ca-sandbox:sandbox-destroy) against an existing box. Five gated phases — pre-flight, clone+build, isolated run, interact, teardown. The load-bearing invariant is structural: untrusted code in the box can never reach the host filesystem (no bind mount, no docker socket, never --privileged, cap-drop ALL, non-root, read-only root). Network defaults to offline; egress out is host-initiated only. Every object is labeled ca.sandbox=1 and torn down on exit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify, categorize, and prioritize accumulated design inconsistencies and structural problems across a product.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a paad/architecture-reviews/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that report — run /agentic-architecture first if there isn't one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working through architectural flaws documented in a .reviews/architecture/ report — selecting which flaws to fix, resuming a partial fix session across multiple sittings, or applying structural changes that need to be tracked back to a report. Not for producing that report — run the agentic-architecture skill first if there isn't one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and not for reviewing a branch diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning of Mary Wollstonecraft (18th-century English philosopher and author of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman) to evaluate situations involving power dynamics, education, independence, gender roles, and systemic inequality. Use this skill whenever Claude encounters career trade-offs involving financial dependence, analyzing structural oppression, questioning societal norms, or balancing reason against emotion. It helps dismantle arbitrary hierarchies, prioritize rational capability over superficial elegance, and frame personal struggles as political realities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies Judea Pearl's causal reasoning frameworks to distinguish correlation from causation, evaluate AI capabilities, and make counterfactual decisions. Reach for this skill whenever Claude encounters questions about causal inference, structural causal models, the limitations of deep learning, AGI, experimental design, covariate selection, or personalized decision-making. Trigger this skill for topics involving Bayesian networks, the do-calculus, the Ladder of Causation, or when a user tries to answer 'what if' or 'why' questions using purely observational data. Pearl's principles are essential for moving beyond probability calculus into true causal understanding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-affiliated AI search optimization discipline. Use when the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' 'optimize for Claude/Gemini,' 'llms.txt,' 'OKF,' 'Open Knowledge Format,' 'knowledge bundle,' or 'agent-readable site.' The durable job: make content structurally extractable, citable, and agent-readable so AI systems surface and cite it. NOT FOR: traditional technical SEO audit (use suede-seo-audit) or launch-appeal grading (use suede-visibility-grader).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。