670 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Compare two sessions side-by-side using Agent Monitor data — per-model token usage (input/output/cache_read/cache_write + compaction baselines), pricing engine cost breakdowns, workflow intelligence (complexity scores, tool flow transitions, subagent effectiveness), session metadata (thinking_blocks, turn_count, turn_duration_ms, usage_extras), and full event timelines with all 10+ event types.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture a hard-won "golden path" from the current session as a reusable Agent Skill, so future sessions start already knowing it. Use it (1) right after non-trivial debugging, after working out a multi-step operational workflow, or after rediscovering project facts you didn't know up front — e.g. how to reach the dev/prod database, where credentials and env vars live, how to deploy, run migrations, or verify a change live; and (2) whenever the user says "remember this", "save this as a skill", "make a skill for this", "don't make me re-explain this next time", or otherwise wants a workflow preserved across sessions. Proactively recognize the moment even when unprompted: if a task took several attempts before it worked, used non-obvious tooling, or is likely to recur, harvest it without asking first. Delegates to a subagent when your tool supports one, or works inline, to extract the proven procedure into a new project-local or global skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an automated codex⇄Claude debate to consensus — no round cap, no deadlock exit. Two explicit subcommands. `review` (also the bare/back-compat default) — codex (reviewer) critiques the current diff and a Claude subagent (author) fixes/disputes, looping until they agree. `answer` — Claude and codex each answer a freeform prompt in parallel, then cross-check until they agree, and a unified answer is returned. Use when the user types `/codex-debate`, asks to "have codex review this", "run the codex debate", "review this PR with codex", "argue this with codex until you agree", or passes a question to "have Claude and codex debate/answer until they agree".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive Test Driven Development guide for engineering subagents with multi-framework support, coverage analysis, and intelligent test generation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run fable-mode execution discipline on Claude Sonnet. When invoked by slash command or by name, spawns a Sonnet subagent that follows the staged loop — stage plan, parallel delegation, a failable verification check at each stage, and a skeptical self-review before delivery; a wording-only request runs the loop inline on the current model. Trigger when the user explicitly asks for thorough/systematic/"deep work" handling on Sonnet.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when verifying build/test/lint before commit, PR, or completion claims. Runs verification pipeline in fresh subagent context with auto-repair. Triggers on /handoff-verify, pre-commit check, build verification, test validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting Claude Code projects, writing CLAUDE.md/spec.md, dispatching subagents, or requesting Agent Teams parallel development. Covers Spec-Driven Development, Context Engineering, and post-dev workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when wrapping up a session before ending. 4 parallel subagents detect doc updates, repeated patterns, learning points, and follow-ups, then a verifier deduplicates and presents choices. Triggers on /session-wrap, session wrap, session cleanup, end of session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full website SEO audit with parallel subagent delegation. Crawls up to 500 pages, detects business type, delegates to up to 15 specialists (8 always + 7 conditional), generates health score. Use when user says audit, full SEO check, SEO best-practice review, analyze my site, website health check, or find SEO issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
把模糊诉求收敛成另一个 AI 能自主执行且可验收的 goal contract（scope / non-goals / success criteria / verification / stop conditions）。本 skill 只写目标契约，**绝不替用户执行任务**。触发硬条件：这份 goal 是要交给别人跑的——subagent、Codex、另一个 AI 会话或另一个人。用于写 goal、优化 goal、改 handoff prompt，或把"今天做完、尽量优化、帮我研究并执行"这类请求变成执行方不会乱猜、不会越界的任务契约。不适用于：自己团队的需求管理和版本拆解（用 issue-pool——它产出的是给人开工的 task，不是给 AI 的契约）、整页界面方案（用 page-solution-design）、PRD/验收标准/测试用例文档（用 prd-test-writer）、框架计划和版本路线（用 issue-pool）、以及用户其实是想让你**直接把这件事做了**的情况——那就直接做，不要走本 skill 把活变成一份文档。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reusable approval-loop pattern for fanning out lead personalization across parallel Claude Code Task sub-agents. Shows the user 1 sample personalization, collects feedback, runs 10 more, approves, runs 10 more — stops when 2 consecutive rounds have zero edits, then scales to the full list. ALWAYS uses Claude Code Task tool sub-agents — never an external Anthropic/OpenAI API key. Use when any skill needs per-lead custom variables (situation lines, value lines, CTAs).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lead substantial Codex builds with one configured implementation worker and lead acceptance. Use when the user requests codex-on-crack, names a model to delegate work to, asks to run subagents through Claude, or requests a lead/worker split. Keep host-only work direct; honor explicit external model choices. Workers must not invoke this orchestrator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a repeatable eval loop that grades agent output with an LLM judge, so prompt/skill changes get scored against a baseline instead of eyeballed. Reuses loopkit's verifier subagent as the grader — do not build a new one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dispatch code-reviewer subagent to review implementation against plan or requirements before proceeding
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
RED-GREEN-REFACTOR for process documentation - baseline without skill, write addressing failures, iterate closing loopholes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TDD for process documentation - test with subagents before writing, iterate until bulletproof
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repo-local workflow skill for large coding tasks. Initializes .agent/tasks/TASK_ID artifacts, installs project-scoped Codex and Claude subagents, updates AGENTS.md plus the repo's Claude guide file with the workflow, and runs a spec-freeze → build → evidence → verify → fix loop with fresh-session verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SVG diagramming conventions blending a technical look with CJK-friendly typography. Use when creating flowcharts, architecture diagrams, and similar SVG figures. For one-shot generation, prefer invoking it from a subagent so the main context does not have to carry this skill plus the SVG XML; for multi-round tweaking, use it directly in the main context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute the next TaskMaster task using the implementation plan with CDD verification. Picks the next ready task, matches it to the plan step, implements via a dispatched subagent, verifies subtasks with evidence, marks the task done, and loops until every task is complete. Wraps the TaskMaster next -> in-progress -> done lifecycle with CDD GREEN / RED / BLUE verification and the plugin's triple-verification rule. Autonomous by design — no user prompts inside the loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to execute a phase's plans, resume the remaining plans, or run only one wave. Discovers plans, groups them into dependency waves, spawns a fresh subagent per plan, then verifies the phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a bug, failing test, or unexpected behaviour needs investigation, especially across sessions or context resets. Isolates it in a debugger subagent with persistent .planning/debug state, unlike skills/systematic-debugging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for a trivial task the user can describe in one sentence: a typo, config change, small refactor or forgotten commit. Executes inline with no subagents and no PLAN.md; anything needing research or planning belongs to /gsd-quick.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。