「submission」の検索結果

Use blind-review-sanitizer for academic writing workflows that need structured anonymization, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries for double-blind submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists researchers with Institutional Review Board (IRB) application tasks, including drafting informed consent documents, reviewing research protocols for compliance, generating application forms, and preparing submission checklists. Use when the user mentions IRB, Instituti...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates professional cover letters for journal submissions and job.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts LabArchives notebook data, entry metadata, and authorized ELN exports into manuscript-ready academic writing outputs such as Methods sections, data-availability statements, reproducibility appendices, experiment timelines, and submission support notes. Optional bundled scripts can be used to collect or validate source notebook data before writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates CIOMS I-compliant ICSR narratives from adverse event case data for FDA and EMA regulatory submission. Includes temporal analysis, MedDRA coding, causality assessment using WHO-UMC or Naranjo criteria, and multi-format output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates submission-ready Elsevier/SCI Highlights from manuscript text or extracted PDF/DOCX/TXT content. Use when a user needs 3-5 concise, evidence-grounded highlight bullets for a research paper, review, meta-analysis, case report, or bioinformatics manuscript.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Matches your study to appropriate journals based on topic, design, and evidence strength. Use when deciding where to submit a manuscript, comparing journal options by impact factor vs scope fit vs method tolerance, or finding a realistic submission target after a rejection. Also triggers on "where should I submit this paper", "which journal is best for my study", "find journals for my manuscript", "is this a good fit for [journal]", or "I need a journal with IF around X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks biomedical manuscripts against reporting guidelines such as CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, and TRIPOD to identify missing or weak reporting elements before submission or revision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimizes manuscript titles and abstracts for information density, factual accuracy, and submission fit in biomedical research writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Condenses a full study into conference-submission abstract format. Use when adapting a manuscript abstract or study summary to meet a specific conference's word limit, structured format (Background/Methods/Results/Conclusion), character limits, or required section headings. Also triggers on "adapt my abstract for [conference]", "shorten my abstract to 250 words", "reformat for ASCO/ASGCT/SfN/AACR", "I need a conference abstract", or "cut my abstract to fit the word limit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft and submit evidence-backed XQUIC GitHub bug issues in the repository's CONTRIBUTING and issue-template format. Use when preparing or opening an alibaba/xquic issue that must identify an exact RFC or draft mechanism, expected-versus-actual behavior, reproduction evidence, and optional verified source root cause; requires issue-check to return true before any GitHub submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interface with Codeforces API for contest data, problem sets, and submissions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SkillsBench task PR review — classifies the task track (standard / research / multimodal), runs static policy checks against the track-specific rubric, benchmarks the task across oracle plus Claude and Codex (with and without skills), audits trajectories for cheating and skill invocation, and produces a `pr-N-task-timestamp-run.txt` review report alongside a `prN.zip` bundle of trajectories. Use when reviewing a SkillsBench task PR (by number, branch, or local task path), when the user asks to review a task, run benchmarks on a PR, audit a submission, classify a task as research or multimodal track, or prepare a comment to post on a SkillsBench PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SkillsBench task authoring — walk a contributor from idea to submission-ready task following CONTRIBUTING.md and the task-implementation rubric. Use when the user wants to create a new SkillsBench task, scaffold a task from an existing workflow (notebook, Excel workbook, document, dataset), convert a prompt or a benchmark item into a SkillsBench task, write skills for a task, or prepare a SkillsBench PR. Pairs with `task-review` (run that as a self-check before submitting).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SkillsBench contribution workflow. Use when: (1) Creating benchmark tasks, (2) Understanding repo structure, (3) Preparing PRs for task submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a funder-compliant Data Management Plan (NSF DMP, NIH DMS Policy 2023, ERC, Horizon Europe) by composing the confidential-data and environment-capture primitives. Sections cover data description, formats/metadata, storage/backup, access/sharing, preservation/archiving, and roles. Use when user says "data management plan", "DMP", "DMSP", "NIH data sharing plan", "write the data plan for my grant", or when a grant proposal needs a data-management section. NOT a submission tool — produces a draft the user pastes into the funder portal (DMPTool, NIH ASSIST, Horizon Europe portal).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce the replication-protocol.md rule by cross-checking numeric claims in a manuscript against the actual R / Stata / Python outputs. Report PASS/FAIL per claim against tolerance thresholds. Use before submission and before releasing a replication package.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only audit of `.tex`, `.qmd`, or `.md` text for AI-voice tells — boilerplate transitions ("Moreover", "Furthermore", "It is important to note that"), AI-cliché lexicon ("delve", "navigate the complexities", "tapestry", "robust framework"), em-dash overuse, symmetric paragraph shapes, tricolon abuse, hedging stacking, "not only X but also Y" frames, and formulaic openers. Produces a report; does NOT rewrite. Use when user says "humanize", "does this sound like AI?", "check for AI tells", "de-AI this draft", "remove AI voice", "audit my prose for sycophancy", or before journal submission / posting a working paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold a graded problem set with sections, problems, worked solutions, and short "why this matters" explainers across analytical, empirical, and coding types. Use when user says "make a problem set on X", "scaffold exercises for this lecture", "create practice problems", "generate homework with a solution key", "build a graded assignment on topic Y". Emits a clean student set plus a separate solution key — NOT for grading submissions or auto-checking student answers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a structured preregistration document (OSF, AsPredicted, or AEA RCT Registry style) from a research spec or free-form study description. Output is a Markdown file with hypotheses, design, sampling plan, analysis plan, exclusions, and inference criteria — annotated with MUST / SHOULD / MAY clarity flags. Use when user says "preregister", "draft a preregistration", "OSF preregistration", "AsPredicted", "AEA RCT registry", "PAP", "preanalysis plan", or before launching an experiment / data collection / analysis on data the analyst has not yet seen. NOT a registry submission tool — produces a document the user uploads to OSF / AsPredicted / AEA themselves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an external frontier-model referee (Claude Code -> a different vendor's frontier model via the Oracle CLI) on a paper, proof, estimator, or replication package -- and adjudicate what comes back. Use when the user says "send this to oracle", "get an external review", "run a referee round", "deep-check this proof", or before a submission when an independent second opinion is worth more than another in-house pass. Never launches bare: brief first, evidence-forcing prompt, coverage manifest, then CONFIRMED/REFUTED/DOWNGRADED triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble a submission-ready replication package to the AEA Data and Code Availability Standard (DCAS) / openICPSR / Social Science Reproduction Platform expectations — standard replication README, dataset manifest, computational-requirements capture, a Table/Figure → script:line map, and a confidential-data deposit plan. Use when user says "build the replication package", "prepare the openICPSR deposit", "make the AEA data and code package", "DCAS compliance", "assemble the deposit for the journal", or after a paper is accepted and the journal's data editor needs the package. NOT a numeric verifier — it calls /audit-reproducibility to confirm claims reproduce before packaging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mechanize Pattern 15 — the seven-pass adversarial review protocol for academic manuscripts. Spawns 7 fresh-context subagents in parallel (abstract, intro, methods, results, robustness, prose, citations), then synthesizes a prioritized revision checklist. Use for submission-ready or R&R-stage papers where single-pass review isn't enough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only R code review protocol for `.R` scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, tidyverse idioms, and professional standards; produces a report without editing. Use when user says "review this R script", "check the R code", "audit the analysis code", "code review on the R", or when an R file is touched as part of a paper submission. NOT for running the code — pair with `/audit-reproducibility` for numeric verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。