411 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when the user runs /toolchain-health and wants a trustworthy green/yellow/red verdict on the installed toolchain with ranked repairs. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a human invokes triage on a new configured Slack issue report. Not for triaging reports from other channels or posting more than one verdict.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ES — Critica a fondo una idea, plan, pitch o proyecto entero sin validar ni adular: asume que va a fracasar y lo demuestra por ocho ángulos (premisas, mercado, competencia, viabilidad, números, ejecución, pre-mortem y punto ciego), investiga fracasos reales cuando hay herramientas, y entrega un veredicto franco con la lista priorizada de qué arreglar. Activar con /abogado-del-diablo, "hazme pedazos esto", "critica mi idea sin filtros", "dime por qué va a fallar", "destruye este plan", "segunda opinión brutal", "pre-mortem". EN — Harshly critiques an idea, plan, pitch, or whole project without validating; assumes it will fail and proves it across eight angles, then returns a blunt verdict with a prioritized fix list. Trigger on "devil's advocate", "red team this", "tear this apart", "why will this fail", "brutal second opinion", "pre-mortem".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a read-only NowStack Mobile launch audit across product, web, iOS, Android, backend, auth, payments, email, storage, analytics, stores, and operations. Returns an evidence-backed GO or NO-GO verdict.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the strict-mode sprint contract review after Phase 2c. Spawns a fresh vcsdd-adversary instance to review `contracts/sprint-N.md` and writes a PASS/FAIL verdict under `reviews/contracts/sprint-N/output/`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Phase 3 (adversarial review) for the active VCSDD feature. Spawns a fresh vcsdd-adversary agent with zero Builder context to review implementation against spec. Produces binary PASS/FAIL verdict per dimension.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Phase 1c (spec review gate) for the active VCSDD feature. Spawns a fresh vcsdd-adversary instance to review the behavioral spec and verification architecture. Records PASS/FAIL gate verdict.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a git commit for the current VCSDD phase. Auto-generates a conventional commit message from state.json including phase, sprint, gate verdict, and affected bead IDs. Tags with vcsdd/<feature>/phase-<id>.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user asks to scan, investigate, or characterize a URL. Submits to URLScan (unlisted by default), cross-references with VirusTotal and OTX, extracts the parent domain and resolved IP for follow-up investigation. Returns verdict, redirect chain, contacted infrastructure, and screenshot. Invoked by /cti-orchestrator when the target is a URL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need authoritative classification, threat-name, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, dynamic-analysis or sandbox results on a file hash, or when you need network threat intelligence for a URL/domain/IP from ReversingLabs Spectra Analyze (A1000). Returns verdict, risk score, AV detection ratio, threat name, behavioural tags, and pivot candidates (parent containers, extracted files, related samples by family). Commonly invoked by /hash-investigation and /malware-analysis. Other agents/skills can chain this for deeper malware enrichment beyond VirusTotal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to check an IP, domain, file hash, or URL against VirusTotal's reputation database. Returns detection ratio, verdict, community score, and key findings. Commonly invoked by investigation skills (/ip-investigation, /domain-investigation, /hash-investigation, /url-investigation) and by analysts enriching IOCs. Other agents/skills can chain this for VirusTotal enrichment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to submit a URL for live scanning via URLScan.io and retrieve results, or search existing scans for a domain. Returns verdict, final URL after redirects, resolved IP, contacted domains/IPs, and screenshot URL. Commonly invoked by /url-investigation and /domain-investigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triages an Aikido security findings CSV against a local codebase. For each finding, reads the flagged file, traces the code path, and verdicts it as KEEP OPEN or CLOSE with a specific reason. Outputs a reviewed CSV and a self-contained HTML evidence report. Run this at the end of a pentest when an Aikido CSV is available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
An adversarial job search that gets better as it goes. Set up a job-search workspace, search a careers board and score roles against the realistic applicant pool, build a resume and cover letter, review them with seven agents that return a verdict per submission channel, then write what the review finds back into the profile. Invoke with /slushpile and name what you want to do.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Curate evidence-backed collateralQuality and whole-book custodyModel labels. Use when adding a stablecoin or auditing Selector custody eligibility and DDR depeg-duration verdicts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality review of test files and manual evidence documents. Goes beyond existence checks — evaluates assertion coverage, edge case handling, naming conventions, and evidence completeness. Produces ADEQUATE/INCOMPLETE/MISSING verdict per story. Run before QA sign-off or on demand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates a UX spec, HUD design, or interaction pattern library for completeness, accessibility compliance, GDD alignment, and implementation readiness. Produces APPROVED / NEEDS REVISION / MAJOR REVISION NEEDED verdict with specific gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate that a story file is implementation-ready. Checks for embedded GDD requirements, ADR references, engine notes, clear acceptance criteria, and no open design questions. Produces READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED verdict with specific gaps. Use when user says 'is this story ready', 'can I start on this story', 'is story X ready to implement'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate readiness to advance between development phases. Produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict with specific blockers and required artifacts. Use when user says 'are we ready to move to X', 'can we advance to production', 'check if we can start the next phase', 'pass the gate'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validates completeness and consistency of the project architecture against all GDDs. Builds a traceability matrix mapping every GDD technical requirement to ADRs, identifies coverage gaps, detects cross-ADR conflicts, verifies engine compatibility consistency across all decisions, and produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict. The architecture equivalent of /design-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when proving that a frontend refactoring preserved existing behavior, selecting an appropriate safety net, validating each structural step, or assigning a PASS, PARTIAL, or NOT PROVEN preservation verdict.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify that an application works correctly using `stably verify`. Use when an AI agent has made code changes and needs to validate the feature works in a real browser. The command describes expected behavior in plain English and reports a PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE verdict — no test files generated. Triggers on: "verify this works", "stably verify", "check if this works", "validate my changes", "verify my feature", "does this work", "check the app", "verify the feature".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-publish (or retroactive) content-quality gate implementing Google's official self-assessment questions from the creating-helpful-content doc, plus 2024 spam-policy red flags. Verdict: PUBLISH / REVISE / RETHINK. Use when user says "helpful content", "people-first", "content self-assessment", "is my content helpful", or "content quality gate".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an adversarial two-phase code review of a change with TWO independent reviewers — Claude and Codex — who review alone, then cross-examine each other's findings, then Claude synthesizes a single weighted verdict. Use when the user says "/adversarial-review", "adversarial review", "review this with Codex", "get Codex to review", "two-reviewer review", "cross-examine this PR", or wants a second independent model to grade a change before merge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。