「what」の検索結果

Analyze an open-source project from What/Why perspective (not how-it's-implemented). Use when the user says "/analyze-oss", "분석해줘 이 오픈소스", "이 레포 뭐하는거야", "analyze this repo", "what does X do", "이거 왜 쓰는거야", "이 라이브러리 분석", provides a GitHub URL and wants understanding, or asks to deeply understand an OSS project's purpose, value, target users, and usage flow. Clones the repo to ~/opensource-analysis/<repo-name>/ (git pull if already exists), dispatches parallel subagents per analysis lens, then synthesizes a What/Why-focused report in chat. Supports optional user-specific follow-up questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in feature prioritization - the art and science of deciding what to build and in what order. Covers prioritization frameworks, roadmap planning, stakeholder management, and the trade-offs between different approaches. Knows that prioritization is about saying no, and how to make those decisions defensible. Use when "prioritization, roadmap, what to build, feature request, backlog, scope, trade-off, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure what matters. Event tracking design, attribution modeling, funnel analysis, experimentation platforms. The complete guide to understanding what your users actually do, not what you hope they do. Good analytics is invisible until you need it. Then it's the difference between guessing and knowing. Use when "analytics, tracking, events, funnel, conversion, attribution, segment, amplitude, mixpanel, posthog, ab testing, experiment, cohort, retention, measure, metrics, analytics, tracking, events, funnel, conversion, attribution, data" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mastery of AI image generation across the full spectrum: Midjourney for aesthetic perfection, Flux for prompt adherence, DALL-E 3 for concept clarity, Stable Diffusion for control, and Imagen 3 for photorealism. This skill transforms text into visual reality at the speed of thought. We've moved beyond "AI can make pictures" to "AI is the fastest concept artist, product photographer, and visual designer ever created." The skill isn't just prompting—it's understanding how each model thinks, what makes images work, and how to systematically produce exactly what you envision. The best AI image generators have internalized composition, lighting, color theory, and style—not by studying art, but by generating thousands of images and learning what works. They're visual directors who happen to work in text. Use when "AI image, generate image, Midjourney, DALL-E, Flux, Stable Diffusion, Imagen, text to image, AI art, AI photo, AI illustration, AI visual, AI graphics, generate picture, ai-image, midjourney, dall-e, flux, stable-diffusion, imagen, generation, text-to-image, visual, art" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to know what will break if they change something, or needs safety analysis before editing code. Examples: "Is it safe to change X?", "What depends on this?", "What will break?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate hierarchical _FEATURES.md files that describe what a codebase DOES from a user/consumer perspective, anchored to source symbols via tree-sitting. Supports large complex codebases through feature-driven decomposition into sub-feature files. Uses a multi-pass synthesis: orientation → detail → overview rewrite. Use when someone says "what does this do", "document features", "feature inventory", "_FEATURES.md", or needs to understand a codebase's purpose before modifying it. Complements tree-sitting (structural) with semantic (why/what-for) layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned operations-assessment discipline that maps how work actually happens before anyone designs a system: floor-level interviews with the people who do the work, an inventory of every silo including spreadsheets and inboxes used as databases, friction quantified in the requester's own numbers, opportunities ranked by annual value against build complexity, and adoption watched for the thirty days after launch. Use when nobody can answer what to automate, when an operation needs auditing before a build, when tribal-knowledge and key-person risk has to surface, or when a shipped system is quietly being routed around. NOT FOR: deciding what to build and in what order once the map exists (use suede-ops-architecture); researching external customers rather than internal operators (use suede-customer-research); lead lifecycle, scoring, and CRM routing rules (use suede-revops); product instrumentation and dashboards (use suede-analytics); getting a new user to first value (use suede-onboarding).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when updating the stakeholder - report in outcome language (what changed for users, what's next, what decision is needed), translate technical detail, and surface risks early

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End of session summary. What got done, what got fixed, what comes next, progress delta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to know what will break if they change something, or needs safety analysis before editing code. Examples: "Is it safe to change X?", "What depends on this?", "What will break?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and ask questions about coding agent session history across Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. Use when asking what was worked on, what was tried before, how a problem was investigated across sessions, what happened recently, or any question about past agent sessions. Also use when the user references prior sessions, previous attempts, or past investigations — even without saying 'sessions' explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analytics reconnaissance for takeover — find all analytics tools, inventory what's tracked and dashboarded, assess data freshness and metric definitions, and present a coverage map. Use when asked "what analytics exist", "BI assessment", or "what do we track".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Metrics architecture — produce a complete metrics plan given a product description. North Star, input metrics tree, instrumentation spec, action triggers, and counter-metrics. Use when asked to "design a metrics framework", "what should we measure", "build a metrics system", "define our KPIs", "what are our success metrics", "metrics strategy", or "what do we track".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analytics reconnaissance — scan existing event tracking, metric definitions, dashboards, and analytics configuration to understand what is currently being measured. Use when asked to "what are we tracking", "audit our analytics", "what metrics exist", "analytics inventory", or before designing new metrics or instrumentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope arbitration — resolve disagreements between product and engineering on what is in or out of scope, with a decision log and escalation path. Use when asked to "resolve this scope disagreement", "arbitrate between product and eng", "scope is creeping", "we can't agree on what's in scope", or "help us decide what to cut".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design meeting and communication cadence — what meetings to run, how often, who attends, and what decisions they make. Use when asked to "design our meeting structure", "what meetings should we have", "reduce meeting load", or "build our operating rhythm".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

User research reconnaissance — survey existing personas, research docs, interview notes, and feedback artifacts to establish what is already known about users. Use when asked to "what research exists", "review existing personas", "what do we know about our users", or before starting new research or synthesis work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write an Architecture Decision Record — document what was decided, why, what alternatives were considered, and what trade-offs were accepted. Use when asked to "write an ADR", "document this decision", or "why did we choose X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Following what organisms do — behavior, metamorphosis, host-plant relationships, social dynamics, and the long-form ethograms that reveal how species actually live. Covers the vocabulary of ethology, the structure of a life cycle, the classic categories of species interaction, the discipline of recording behavior without premature interpretation, and the gap between a single observation and a statistically useful record. Use when the task is to understand or record what a species does rather than what it is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understanding and managing what digital services collect, store, share, and infer about you. Covers password security and entropy, multi-factor authentication, privacy settings, data minimization, the difference between first-party and third-party tracking, cookies and fingerprinting, privacy laws (GDPR, CCPA), and how to respond to data breaches. Use when helping a learner make informed decisions about what to share, with whom, and under what terms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan Claude Code session transcripts to find the strongest user reactions to assistant instruction-following failures, reconstruct the triggering assistant output, and render a shareable terminal-style PNG artifact. Use when you want to surface and share a moment where the assistant completely missed what was asked — captures what they were doing, what Claude said, and how the user reacted. Triggers on: "rtfp", "read the fucking prompt", "find my worst AI moment", "make a rage screenshot from this session".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Local codebase analysis research angle — derives behavioral contracts, coding conventions, SKILL.md flow insertion points, and agent data availability maps from actual source files. Use when the blocking question is answered by reading the repository: what does this function actually do, what pattern does the codebase use for X, where in this workflow does a new step go, or what data does this agent already have.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarise the job search from the markdown tracker - funnel, response rate, what's working, where applications come from, what's pending on the user. Use when the user runs /seekter-report or asks how the search is going, for weekly numbers, or what to change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。