「eval」の検索結果

Analyze magnetic levitation systems by applying Earnshaw's theorem to determine whether passive static levitation is possible, then identifying the appropriate circumvention mechanism (diamagnetic, superconducting, active feedback, or spin-stabilized). Use when evaluating maglev transport, magnetic bearings, superconducting levitation, diamagnetic suspension, or Levitron-type devices. Covers force balance calculations, stability analysis in all spatial and tilting modes, and Meissner effect versus flux pinning distinctions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI multi-path reasoning coherence using bee democracy — independent evaluation of competing approaches, waggle dance as reasoning-out-loud, quorum sensing for confidence thresholds, and deadlock resolution. Use when forage-solutions has identified multiple valid approaches and a selection must be made, when oscillating between options without committing, when justifying an architecture or tool choice with structured reasoning, or before an irreversible action where the cost of the wrong choice is high.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appraise gemstone value using the four Cs (color, clarity, cut, carat), origin assessment, treatment detection, and market factor analysis. Advisory educational guidance only — not a certified appraisal. Use when understanding factors that determine a gemstone's value, pre-screening stones before a professional appraisal, evaluating whether a seller's asking price is reasonable, learning gemstone grading methodology, or understanding how treatment status affects value.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply semantic versioning (SemVer 2.0.0) to determine the correct version bump based on change analysis. Covers major/minor/patch classification, pre-release identifiers, build metadata, and breaking change detection. Use when preparing a new release to determine the correct version number, after merging changes before tagging, evaluating whether a change constitutes a breaking change, adding pre-release identifiers, or resolving disagreement about what version bump is appropriate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a system's current structural form, identify transformation pressure, and classify transformation readiness. Covers structural inventory, pressure mapping, rigidity assessment, change capacity estimation, and readiness classification for architectural metamorphosis. Use before any significant architectural change to understand the starting point, when a system feels stuck without clear reasons, when external pressure from growth or tech debt is mounting, or as periodic health checks for long-lived systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map the intellectual property landscape for a technology domain or product area. Covers patent cluster analysis, white space identification, competitor IP portfolio assessment, freedom-to-operate preliminary screening, and strategic IP positioning recommendations. Use before starting R&D in a new technology area, when evaluating market entry against incumbents with strong patent portfolios, preparing for investment due diligence, informing a patent filing strategy, or assessing freedom-to-operate risk for a new product.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a tensegrity system by identifying compression struts and tension cables, classifying type (class 1/2, biological/architectural), computing prestress equilibrium, verifying stability via Maxwell's rigidity criterion, and mapping biological tensegrity (microtubules, actin, intermediate filaments). Use when evaluating tensegrity in architecture, robotics, cell biology, or any system with isolated compression in continuous tension.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a competitive or casual trading card game deck. Covers archetype selection, mana/energy curve analysis, win condition identification, meta-game positioning, and sideboard construction for Pokemon TCG, Magic: The Gathering, Flesh and Blood, and other TCGs. Use when building a new deck for a tournament format or casual play, adapting an existing deck to a changed meta-game, evaluating whether a new set warrants a deck change, or converting a deck concept into a tournament-ready list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React Server Components vs Client Components in Next.js: the boundary discipline, "use client" / "use server" directives, Server Actions, what serializes across the boundary, common pitfalls. Use this skill to: - Decide whether a component should be RSC or Client. - Push the "use client" boundary as deep as possible. - Implement Server Actions correctly (auth, validation, revalidation). - Compose RSC and Client components without breaking the model. - Pass data across the boundary safely. Do NOT use this skill for: - General Next.js conventions (see nextjs-conventions). - Specific data-fetching APIs and caching (see nextjs-data-fetching). - Routing (see nextjs-routing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create consistent nn_cfd W&B experiment comparison reports from selected run IDs using wandb and wandb_workspaces. Use this whenever the user asks to report experiment results, create a W&B Report, compare CFD training/eval runs, document baseline-vs-variant outcomes, reproduce the project experiment report template, or publish a leaderboard-style report for milieu/nn_cfd.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive US stock analysis including fundamental analysis (financial metrics, business quality, valuation), technical analysis (indicators, chart patterns, support/resistance), stock comparisons, and investment report generation. Use when user requests analysis of US stock tickers (e.g., "analyze AAPL", "compare TSLA vs NVDA", "give me a report on Microsoft"), evaluation of financial metrics, technical chart analysis, or investment recommendations for American stocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates market bubble risk through quantitative data-driven analysis using the revised Minsky/Kindleberger framework v2.1. Prioritizes objective metrics (Put/Call, VIX, margin debt, breadth, IPO data) over subjective impressions. Features strict qualitative adjustment criteria with confirmation bias prevention. Supports practical investment decisions with mandatory data collection and mechanical scoring. Use when user asks about bubble risk, valuation concerns, or profit-taking timing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or evaluating a Hare program: hare build, run, or test, tagged-union error handling, or calling C through bodyless fn declarations and -l. Not for Zig or C: use zig-cinterop or gcc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating Carbon for a C++ code base, running the carbon toolchain from a nightly or Bazel build, or comparing Carbon with staying on C++. Not for C++ modules: use cpp-modules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating whether a bug issue has sufficient detail and identifying missing reporter information. Not for non-bug issues or backlog triage: use github-backlog-triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when agent strategies need a reproducible finite tournament under a frozen evaluation protocol. Not for open-ended or infinite matchups: use a continuous benchmark.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with Odylith context-engine packets, retrieval, and routing support flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a strict multi-iteration Reflex Loop with phases (PLAN, PRODUCE||PREPARE, EVALUATE, CRITIQUE, REFINE) to improve an artifact until quality gates pass or iteration limits are reached. Use when user asks for iterative refinement, quality-gated generation, or "generate -> critique -> refine" loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SWE-bench pipeline for A/B testing Grafema with Claude Code. Use when: (1) running SWE-bench experiments, (2) comparing baseline vs grafema conditions, (3) evaluating results, (4) debugging container issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handles NoSQL document operations and collection hierarchy exploration. Use for CRUD tasks and data retrieval. Provides flexible document manipulation and structured querying.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate workloads from Google Cloud Platform to AWS — including AI and agentic workloads regardless of cloud provider. Triggers on: migrate from GCP, GCP to AWS, move off Google Cloud, migrate Terraform to AWS, migrate Cloud SQL to RDS, migrate GKE to EKS, migrate Cloud Run to Fargate, Google Cloud migration, migrate from OpenAI to Bedrock, move off OpenAI, switch from ChatGPT API to AWS, migrate from Gemini to Bedrock, migrate LangChain to Bedrock, migrate LangGraph to AWS, migrate agentic workloads to AWS, move AI workloads to AWS, migrate my AI app to AWS. Runs a 6-phase process: discover GCP resources from Terraform files, app code, or billing exports, clarify migration requirements, design AWS architecture, estimate costs, generate migration artifacts, and collect optional feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. Includes AI provider migration guidance (for example, OpenAI to Amazon Bedrock) by selecting closest-fit Bedrock model families for required modality, latency/quality targets, context windows, and cost constraints. Model mapping is compatibility-guided, not 1:1 parity; validate prompts, tool-calling behavior, and eval metrics before cutover. Do not use for: Azure or on-premises migrations to AWS, AWS-to-GCP reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, GCP-to-GCP refactoring, or multi-cloud deployments that do not involve migrating off GCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Codex Optimized Development, Evaluation, and Remediation (CODER) Loop with an orchestration-only coordinator, non-overlapping task-family owners, fresh independent reviewers, evidence-scoped remediation, and final coordinator acceptance. Discover and compose optional MSW, Timebox, MSL, and Codex Voice Optimizer companions as the Slopware Dev Stack without making them dependencies. Use in Codex when the user invokes the CODER Loop, asks to divide a complex change into bounded implementation families with independent reviewers, requests multi-agent implementation without overlapping ownership, requires review and repair until every blocking gap is independently rechecked, asks for the CODER tutorial or Slopware Dev Stack, or wants CODER to install or use its companions. Do not trigger for an ordinary single-agent change, a review-only request, or a non-Codex host.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and evaluate context compression strategies for long-running agent sessions. Use when agents exhaust memory, need to summarize conversation history, or when optimizing tokens-per-task rather than tokens-per-request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。