「uat」の検索結果

AI compliance analysis for EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, GDPR, OECD, financial services regulations (SEC, FCA, FINRA, DORA, MiFID II), and other frameworks. Use when asked to generate a compliance checklist for an AI tool or use case, determine if a risk assessment is required, score an AI tool's risk level, identify where an AI tool or use case could run afoul of regulatory requirements, perform a gap analysis, recommend remediation steps, assess a vendor, draft an acceptable use policy, map training requirements, or review jurisdiction-specific AI rules. Triggers on phrases like "compliance checklist", "risk assessment", "risk score", "does this comply", "EU AI Act", "ISO 42001", "NIST AI RMF", "AI governance", "gap analysis", "vendor assessment", "acceptable use policy", "MNPI", "AI training requirements", or any request to evaluate an AI tool or use case for regulatory compliance or risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares for hiring manager rounds at Staff+ (L6+) level — scope of impact, influence without authority, ambiguity navigation, mentorship, strategic thinking. Use when practicing HM rounds or calibrating story depth for target level. Activate on "hiring manager round", "HM screen", "staff level", "scope of impact". NOT for coding interviews, system design, behavioral/values rounds, or resume writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a candidate-controlled preparation plan for a software-engineering interview target, timeline, and practice evidence. Use for planning round coverage, story coherence, mock cadence, and debrief-driven adjustments. NOT for hiring predictions, candidate ranking, surveillance, or replacing round-specific coaching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply rapport-based elicitation to resistant or semi-cooperative humans and agents. Use when coercive prompting or brittle handoffs damage cooperation. NOT for routine cooperative tasks, pure technical debugging, or already reliable exchanges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for sensemaking, frame revision, anomaly handling, questioning strategy, and ambiguity diagnosis with the Data/Frame model before action is chosen. NOT for deterministic classification, settled execution planning, or situations where the frame is already stable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design dashboards for migrations and runtimes. Use for authority drift, verifier status, burn-down, runtime health, or pain panels. NOT for vanity analytics, ad hoc charts, or duplicate reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Benchmark multi-agent coordination systems with experiment design, power analysis, human rating protocols, bootstrap confidence intervals, and reproducible reporting. Use for salvage latency, recovery fidelity, coordination overhead, and protocol comparison studies. NOT for ML model benchmarking, web-product A/B testing, survey design, or general-purpose data science.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Managing third-party dependencies — version pinning, security auditing, license compliance, update workflows, lockfile management, supply chain security. Activate on "npm audit", "dependabot", "renovate", "pin versions", "dependency update", "supply chain", "license compliance", "lockfile", "security advisory", "typosquatting", "SBOM". NOT for internal monorepo package management (use monorepo-management) or publishing your own packages to npm/PyPI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handle mental health crisis situations in AI coaching safely. Use when implementing crisis detection, safety protocols, emergency escalation, or suicide prevention features. Activates for crisis keywords, safety planning, hotline integration, and risk assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for eliciting, representing, and operationalizing expert cognitive skills—pattern recognition, situation assessment, mental simulation—from practitioners without requiring research training. Bridges academic rigor and practical usability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic patterns for solving intractable problems through cascading approximation, self-improvement, and heterogeneous evaluation from DeepMind's AlphaGo system

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep multi-source technical research with citations — tech evaluation, ecosystem/standards comparison. NOT for API docs (mk:docs-finder), codebase discovery (mk:scout), or project Q&A (mk:ask-me).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Persists and restores mid-session workflow progress across context resets. Use when resuming workflows, saving state, or handling context compaction. Triggers on: handoff, save state, resume workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Negotiates a file-based sprint contract between generator and evaluator before code is written: turns a spec into testable acceptance criteria with rubric tie-ins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-pass structural code review with adversarial personas. Input: branch diff (default), PR #123, commit, --pending. Use for 'review this PR/diff'. NOT for behavioral verification (mk:evaluate).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Heuristic read-only story-point estimation for one Jira ticket via jira-estimator agent. NOT complexity analysis (mk:jira-evaluator) or full RCA (mk:jira-analyst).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only full Jira ticket analysis incl. media + linked issues via jira-analyst agent; produces comment-ready findings. NOT complexity scoring (mk:jira-evaluator) or estimation (mk:jira-estimator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs autonomous multi-hour green-field builds: planner, contract, generator/evaluator loop, scaffolding density per model tier. NOT for scoped tasks (mk:cook); NOT for scaffolding only (mk:bootstrap).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. Use AFTER a plan exists. For validating the idea itself before planning, use /mk:office-hours first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-pass structural code review with adversarial analysis, scope-aware dispatch, adversarial persona passes, and forced-finding protocol. Supports input modes: branch diff (default), PR number (#123), commit hash, pending changes (--pending). Use when asked to "review this PR", "code review", "pre-landing review", "check my diff", or "review #123". Proactively suggest when the user is about to merge or land code changes. NOT for behavioral verification against a running build (see mk:evaluate); NOT for post-implementation simplification (see mk:simplify).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Heuristic story-point estimation for a single Jira ticket via the jira-estimator agent. Read-only. Triggers: 'estimate KEY', 'story points for KEY', 'how complex is KEY'. NOT for complexity-only analysis (mk:jira-evaluator); NOT for full RCA (mk:jira-analyst).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when autonomously improving a measurable scalar metric through bounded, git-tracked iterations: modify one scoped change, verify, keep or revert. Triggers on /mk:loop, 'optimize coverage/bundle size/lint count', 'iterate until the metric improves'. NOT for subjective cleanup (see mk:cook), known-root-cause bugs (see mk:fix), behavioral grading (see mk:evaluate), or shipping (see mk:ship).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when refining a draft user prompt before sending it to a coding agent. Decomposes goal/context/constraints/acceptance/output-format, detects ambiguity and model-coupled framing, then emits a model-agnostic rewrite. Supports --analyze, --score, and --deep. NOT for prompts from scratch (mk:brainstorming), plans/reviews (mk:elicit), implementation plans (mk:plan-creator), or general codebase scouting (mk:scout).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full Jira ticket context analysis via the jira-analyst agent — including media (attached images / PDFs / screenshots) and linked issues. Produces structured findings suitable for posting back as a Jira comment. Read-only. Triggers: 'analyze KEY', 'rca for KEY', 'describe KEY with media'. NOT for complexity scoring (mk:jira-evaluator); NOT for story-point estimation (mk:jira-estimator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。