3,487 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Assembles the minimal context pack for a given task. Use when the task spans multiple domains or the context set has obvious redundancy. Do not trim required working context by default.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a minimal context pack and recommend the correct specialist path for token-efficient execution. Use when the task is non-trivial, spans multiple domains, or should reduce token usage before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes authorized attack simulations against Active Directory environments to identify misconfigurations, weak credentials, dangerous privilege paths, and exploitable trust relationships that could lead to domain compromise. The tester uses BloodHound for attack path analysis, Mimikatz for credential extraction, and Impacket for protocol-level attacks including Kerberoasting, AS-REP Roasting, and delegation abuse. Activates for requests involving Active Directory pentest, AD attack simulation, domain compromise testing, or Kerberos attack assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill covers detecting anomalies in Modbus/TCP and Modbus RTU communications in industrial control systems. It addresses function code monitoring, register range validation, timing analysis, unauthorized client detection, and deep packet inspection for malformed Modbus frames. The skill leverages Zeek with Modbus protocol analyzers, Suricata IDS with OT rules, and custom Python-based detection using Markov chain models for normal Modbus transaction sequences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect command injection attacks against Modbus TCP/RTU protocol in ICS environments by monitoring for unauthorized write operations, anomalous function codes, malformed frames, and deviations from established communication baselines using ICS-aware IDS and protocol deep packet inspection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect anomalies in DNP3 (Distributed Network Protocol 3) communications used in SCADA systems by monitoring for unauthorized control commands, firmware update attempts, protocol violations, and deviations from baseline traffic patterns using deep packet inspection and machine learning approaches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects and analyzes Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) security attacks including sniffing, replay attacks, GATT enumeration abuse, and Man-in-the-Middle interception. Uses Ubertooth One and nRF52840 sniffers for packet capture, the bleak Python library for GATT service enumeration, and crackle for BLE encryption cracking. Use when assessing IoT device BLE security, monitoring for BLE-based attacks on wireless infrastructure, or performing authorized BLE penetration testing. Activates for requests involving BLE security assessment, Ubertooth sniffing, GATT enumeration, or BLE replay detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy a Software-Defined Perimeter using the CSA v2.0 specification with Single Packet Authorization, mutual TLS, and SDP controller/gateway configuration to enforce zero trust network access.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute an internal network penetration test simulating an insider threat or post-breach attacker to identify lateral movement paths, privilege escalation vectors, and sensitive data exposure within the corporate network.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes network traffic captures and flow data to identify adversary activity during security incidents, including command-and-control communications, lateral movement, data exfiltration, and exploitation attempts. Uses Wireshark, Zeek, and NetFlow analysis techniques. Activates for requests involving network traffic analysis, packet capture investigation, PCAP analysis, network forensics, C2 traffic detection, or exfiltration detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and create AEM Workflow models on AEM as a Cloud Service. Use when creating workflow models via the Workflow Model Editor or content package XML, defining step types (PROCESS, PARTICIPANT, DYNAMIC_PARTICIPANT, OR_SPLIT, AND_SPLIT), configuring step properties, declaring workflow variables, and deploying models through the Cloud Manager pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when publishing, unpublishing, replicating, or activating/deactivating content in AEM 6.5 LTS. Covers Quick Publish, Manage Publication, tree activation, bulk content activation, package replication, workflow-based approval, scheduled activation/deactivation (on/off time), dispatcher flush, and the programmatic Replication Java API for AEM publish instances.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[BETA] Expert assistance for the Adobe I/O CLI plugin `@adobe/aio-cli-plugin-aem-rde` — the `aio aem rde` / `aio aem:rde` command tree used to deploy, inspect, log-tail, snapshot, and troubleshoot AEM Rapid Development Environments (RDEs). Activate ONLY when the user explicitly references RDE concepts: 'AEM RDE', 'Rapid Development Environment', `aio aem rde`, `aio aem:rde`, `aem-rde`, RDE snapshots, RDE deploy/install, `rde install`, `rde inspect`, `rde status`, `rde history`, `rde reset`, the `@adobe/aio-cli-plugin-aem-rde` package, or Cloud Manager program/environment configuration that is specifically for an RDE environment. Do NOT activate on generic AEMaaCS phrases like 'deploy to AEM Cloud', 'push my bundle', 'tail the publish log', 'cloud sandbox', or unqualified 'dispatcher-config / frontend / env-config deployments' — those belong to Cloud Manager pipelines, not RDE. This skill is in beta. Verify all outputs before applying them to production projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare an explicit production launch, staged rollout, launch-monitoring, or rollback plan; do not trigger from AILI SHIP, implementation completion, packaging, review, or release wording that lacks a concrete launch/rollout target.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clarify a concrete requirements decision, create one bounded static interview packet, or run an explicitly user-invoked frontier batch over a plan, decision, or idea; trigger on explicit grill/interview/refinement intent or a named material ambiguity, not on ordinary planning, implementation, research, test-plan, report-style review, or BUILD work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure or diagnose project context, rules files, context packs, or documented context degradation when explicitly requested; do not trigger automatically at session start, task switching, ordinary repository exploration, implementation, or completion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repair one concrete reproducible build, typecheck, lint, test, packaging, or CI failure with a bounded root-cause-first loop; do not trigger for runtime bugs without a failing gate, broad test strategy, dependency/toolchain migration, or generic implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the AILI delivery lifecycle from natural-language IDEATE, DEFINE, BUILD, and SHIP intent or the equivalent slash shortcuts; use for idea shaping, spec/test definition, bounded BUILD package queues, review-repair closeout, or adapter routing without exposing internal stage commands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prefer a fresh matching specialist for a clear bounded non-trivial package when current capabilities and permissions permit it; use direct ROSE work only for accepted direct-work exceptions or a concrete block.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a non-destructive open-source, npm, or public release readiness checklist covering package metadata, provenance, license, internal artifact exposure, and dry-run evidence; complements security, shipping, and sanitizer reviews, and must not publish, delete, rewrite history, or mutate release state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break a clear scope or accepted specification into ordered tasks/packages when the user explicitly asks for a plan, estimate, dependency order, or task breakdown; do not trigger for ordinary implementation, every multi-step task, speculative parallelism, review, or completion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose user-reported AILI/ROSE harness or workflow behavior problems without editing files; use when the user says a command, skill trigger, subagent packet, memory flow, installer, docs, or agent prompt behavior is wrong and wants to know where the issue lives and how to fix it. Do not use for normal product-code bugs; return any approved modification need to ROSE.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Idiomatic Go - package and interface design, error wrapping, table-driven tests, generics, the modern standard library (slices/maps/cmp/errors.Join), current syntax, and logging discipline. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring any Go code, especially code drifting toward Java/Spring shapes (deep layer trees, generic repositories, heavy frameworks) - even if the user never says "idiomatic". Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimizes CI pipelines for monorepos by detecting affected packages/apps and running only necessary builds and tests. Includes Turborepo/Nx strategies, caching, and parallel execution. Use for "monorepo CI", "affected detection", "incremental builds", or "workspace optimization".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。