「audit」の検索結果

Multi-agent comprehensive slide review (visual + pedagogy + proofreading, plus TikZ / parity / substance conditionally). Use when user says "full review", "excellence pass", "comprehensive check", "review everything", "pre-release review", "slide excellence", or before teaching / shipping a deck. Fanout wrapper — for a single lens, use `/visual-audit`, `/pedagogy-review`, or `/proofread` directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive manuscript review with three modes: single-pass (default), --adversarial critic-fixer loop, and --peer [journal] simulated peer-review pipeline (editor + 2 dispositioned referees + editorial decision, calibrated to a target journal). R&R continuation via --peer --r2/--r3; hostile-editor stress test via --peer --stress; reviewer-disposition variance reporting via --peer --variance N. Auto-invokes /review-r + /audit-reproducibility on referenced scripts unless --no-cross-artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble a submission-ready replication package to the AEA Data and Code Availability Standard (DCAS) / openICPSR / Social Science Reproduction Platform expectations — standard replication README, dataset manifest, computational-requirements capture, a Table/Figure → script:line map, and a confidential-data deposit plan. Use when user says "build the replication package", "prepare the openICPSR deposit", "make the AEA data and code package", "DCAS compliance", "assemble the deposit for the journal", or after a paper is accepted and the journal's data editor needs the package. NOT a numeric verifier — it calls /audit-reproducibility to confirm claims reproduce before packaging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn an incoming set of findings — from an AI reviewer, a referee report, a code review, a linter, or a second model — into verified fixes, without letting a confident misread damage correct work. Every finding is a CANDIDATE until checked against the actual source. Use whenever you receive review comments, audit findings, or a critique you did not write yourself, especially when the reviewer is a model or when the volume is too large to check by feel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keeps a project's to-do list and memory in GitHub issues — files each finding (from a review, an audit, or the user) as its own issue without duplicates, lists the open issues that bear on the current work, and closes an issue with a comment recording what was wrong, what was tried, what worked, and how it was fixed. Use when review findings or a list of problems should become tracked work (a paper's misleading claims, a codebase's bugs, improvements for later), when starting or resuming work and deciding what to do next, or when a fix has landed and its issue should be closed with a record. Needs the GitHub CLI; warns before posting to a public repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce the replication-protocol.md rule by cross-checking numeric claims in a manuscript against the actual R / Stata / Python outputs. Report PASS/FAIL per claim against tolerance thresholds. Use before submission and before releasing a replication package.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare two implementations of the same thing — a port (R↔Python↔Stata), a reimplementation, a replication package, a refactor, or a new version against the old — so that agreement means something. Freeze inputs first, inventory every expected output, test the comparator itself, compare every channel (not just the headline number), and give each divergence a stable ID and a smallest witness. Use for cross-language parity, replication, upgrade/regression gates, or whenever "the numbers match" is about to license a claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate cloned narration for the content workspace. Use local IndexTTS2 with the canonical lossless Pluviobyte reference for every local video, voice audition, digital-human narration, and subtitle-ready audio render. Preserve MiniMax only for public-facing articles or tutorials that teach users to connect through the relay service; never use MiniMax for local video production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dontbesilent 内容结构化系统。把本地大量文稿、推文、选题、案例和课程稿搭成一个可持续生长的内容结构化工程：先审计内容规模与边界，再建立新工程、复制素材、抽取内容单元、生成主题地图与选题装配稿。 触发方式：/dbs-content-system、/内容结构化系统、「把我的内容做成结构化系统」「把本地素材变成可重组系统」「帮我搭内容资产工程」「我想把旧内容变成可复用资产」 Content structuring system. Audits local content volume, then builds a reusable content knowledge project with units, topic maps, and assembly drafts. Trigger: /dbs-content-system, "build a content structuring system", "turn my archive into reusable assets"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent 工作台迁移。把任意项目整理成 Claude Code / Codex / Grok 三端一致、可长期维护的 Agent 工作台：审计规则文件、识别真源、统一命名并生成 bridge。 触发方式：/dbs-agent-migration、/agent迁移、「迁移到 Codex」「迁移到 Claude Code」「迁移到 Grok」「统一 AGENTS.md」「整理 skill bridge」「我的 Agent 工作台很乱」「帮我统一 Claude 和 Codex 和 Grok」 Agent workspace migration. Turn any project into a maintainable Claude Code / Codex / Grok three-host workspace by auditing rule files, establishing source-of-truth skills, normalizing names, and generating bridges. Trigger: /dbs-agent-migration, /agent-migration, "migrate to Codex", "migrate to Claude Code", "migrate to Grok", "fix AGENTS.md", "organize skill bridges"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dontbesilent 目标清晰化。用维特根斯坦的语言哲学把模糊的目标审计成可检查的交付物。 触发方式：/dbs-goal、/目标、「帮我搞清楚目标」「我想做个人 IP」「我的目标是成为...」「我想变得更...」 Goal clarification using Wittgenstein's philosophy of language. Audits fuzzy goals into checkable deliverables. Trigger: /dbs-goal, "help me clarify my goal", "I want to become...", "my goal is..."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Review and improve documentation for novice users. Use when users ask to review docs, improve documentation, audit README files, evaluate API docs, review guides, or improve technical writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Review code, skills, and prompts for security vulnerabilities — OWASP Top 10, prompt injection, business logic flaws, and insecure defaults. Use when reviewing PRs, auditing modules, reviewing AI skills/prompts, or preparing for release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gate a pitch against one journalist at a time. Runs the pair through proven media-relations checks (last-10-bylines audit, 90-day topic sweep, beat-vs-angle-vs-one-off, the 5 forms of journalism, source-mirror, stated-preferences, database triangulation) and returns fit, soft-fit, no-fit, or unknown with a real recent anchor and specific edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or auditing an agent-team sitemap, Task Bias ledger, concept coverage, product surface map, validation chain, or missing-concept check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding or auditing local runtime behavior that turns a project folder into an Agentlas-aware workspace with .agentlas memory and sitemap files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating or auditing a multi-role agent team package with orchestrator, PM Soul, Memory Curator, Policy Gate, workers, eval, QA, handoffs, and runtime adapters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding or auditing Agentlas skill lifecycle metadata, skill-registry.json, trial evidence, Curator promotion decisions, or first-class skill promotion gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides Microsoft Entra ID app registration, OAuth 2.0 authentication, and MSAL integration. USE FOR: create app registration, register Azure AD app, configure OAuth, set up authentication, add API permissions, generate service principal, MSAL example, console app auth, Entra ID setup, Azure AD authentication. DO NOT USE FOR: Key Vault secrets (use azure-keyvault-expiration-audit), general Azure resource security guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Health-check your meeting knowledge for contradictions, stale commitments, and decision conflicts. Use when the user asks "any conflicts in my meetings", "check for stale action items", "lint my meetings", "consistency check", "are there contradictions", or wants to audit their decision history.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a single pass, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants an overall quality assessment, asks "how healthy is this codebase?", "run all the checks", "I need a health score before the release", or wants to onboard a new team with a quality overview. Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP health endpoints, Kubernetes liveness/readiness probes, database health, or application uptime. Also do not trigger when the user specifically requests only one dimension — use the corresponding focused skill instead (brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Git configuration with one read-only baseline command, then propose confirmed, non-destructive fixes for identity, editor, and diff and merge tooling, with signing and safe.directory help only on request. Use when setting up or checking Git on a workstation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canonical documentation capability for audit, drift, validate, and author modes in hve-core.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and use Crabbox for repository tests and validation on remote runners. Use when crabbox.yaml or .crabbox.yaml exists, the crabbox CLI is available, or work needs remote compute, a clean or reusable environment, target-platform coverage, or auditable execution evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。