Comprehensive guide for skill development based on Anthropic's official best practices - use for complex skills requiring detailed structure
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
6,717 件 ・ 関連度順
Comprehensive guide for skill development based on Anthropic's official best practices - use for complex skills requiring detailed structure
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating or developing, before writing code or implementation plans - refines rough ideas into fully-formed designs through collaborative questioning, alternative exploration, and incremental validation. Don't use during clear 'mechanical' processes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How episodic television actually gets made by a group (编剧室与制作现实) — merged from Goldberg & Rabkin (pitch as audition, leave-behind, cracking the story, beat sheet, notes discipline, production rewrites), Pamela Douglas (John Wells's room, staff-from-hell mistakes, the seven-rung ladder, step deal, the 14-day draft), Neil Landau's showrunner interviews (Lindelof, Mazzara, Katims, Bays), Evan Smith on sitcom staffing and roundtables, Richard Blum (dated), Kam Miller, and first-hand accounts by David Chase, Jesse Armstrong, Lucy Prebble, Aaron Sorkin, Julian Fellowes and Phoebe Waller-Bridge. Use when joining or running a writers' room, breaking an episode with a group, writing a leave-behind, beat sheet or outline on deadline, pitching episode ideas to an existing series, writing a spec episode, taking or giving notes, rewriting because of money, actors or locations, choosing between a staffed room and a single-author process, or asking 什么是 showrunner/编剧室怎么运作/怎么接 note.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Character creation, protagonist/antagonist design and dramatic conflict for scripts (人物/对手/冲突) — merged from Lajos Egri (three-dimensional character, orchestration, unity of opposites, pivotal character, rising vs static vs jumping conflict, transition), William Indick's Psychology for Screenwriters (Freud, Erikson, Jung archetypes, Campbell/Murdock hero journeys, Adler, Rollo May), Robert McKee (characterization vs true character, dimensions, gap, antagonism principle), Neill Hicks (character invocation, self-concept, cognitive dissonance, five conflict focuses, Maslow), Lisa Cron (desire vs misbelief), and Lu Jun (人物要活八要, 对手要强, 给对手一把刀, 最强的对手是自己, 不许请祥云). Use when building a protagonist, an antagonist or a cast, when a character feels flat or acts out of character, when conflict stalls or jumps, when a villain is too weak, when designing an arc or motive, or when diagnosing melodrama.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Korean and French screenwriting practice (韩国/法国编剧方法) — from the international masterclass; Oh Seung-uk (Christmas in August, The Shameless; field research in disguise, "write the emotion", first act and last act first, spaces as skeleton, reading to hostile listeners, surviving producers), Choi Seok-hwan (King and the Clown; genre as promise to the audience, "story = deepening crisis + intensifying desire", two reversals and bittersweet endings, the producer/director/writer trio), and Frédéric Auburtin (Paris je t'aime; dialogue last, Italian-style table reads, "12 lines not 13", dignity for characters, originals born from commissions, editing by emotion). Use when working in a Korean-style commercial drama or genre film, a French auteur/commission context, when planning field research, when a producer relationship is the problem, or when you need the Korean "three live together" development model or the French "emotion first, structure second" editing approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project orchestrator for the screenwriting skill set (剧本项目主线调度 / 状态存档 / story bible) — a meta-skill that adds no new craft knowledge but routes a screenplay or stage-play project through stages (premise → structure → character → scenes → draft → revision → submission) and a TV / streaming series project (电视剧 / 剧集 / pilot / 一季) through a separate series stage table (engine → character network & season arc → documents/bible → pilot structure → break story & outline → draft → submission), names which sw-* skill to invoke at each stage, defines each stage's deliverable and advisory exit check, and keeps all project state in a story-bible.md file so work can resume across sessions. Use when starting a new script project, resuming one ("continue my screenplay", "where were we"), when the user asks "what should I do next" on a script, when converting a vague idea into a full development pipeline, or when the other sw-* skills are firing individually and the overall process needs sequencing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PromptHub release update skill. Use for `/update-readme`, version bumps, changelog updates, website sync, GUI screenshot/doc refresh, and multilingual release/documentation alignment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Live Borg debugging by exec-ing into the borg-web-ui Docker container. Use when debugging borg commands, writing tests against real borg output, developing borg 2.0 features, or verifying borg behavior before writing code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract reusable knowledge from the current session into a persistent skill. Use when you discover something non-obvious, create a workaround, or develop a multi-step workflow that future sessions would benefit from.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or revise Chinese social-media covers through the registered Skill-封面 asset system, reusable styles, presenter identities, ratio-specific layouts, and exact replacement prompts. Use only when the user explicitly says“skill-cover”“Skill-封面”“实战风格”, requests the registered style/gesture assets, asks for simultaneous 3:4 and 4:3 registered-layout output, replaces a reference cover's person with the current digital-human frame, or extends this registered cover system. Do not use for a generic“制作封面/生成封面”request; generic cover requests belong to dog-skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recover the first public timestamp and canonical major coverage for a newsjacking signal, then decide whether newer coverage is the same story, a different story, or a materially new development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, track and update team goals via the Deeplake virtual filesystem at memory/goal/. Use whenever the user mentions a goal, objective, target, milestone, or asks to track progress on something measurable. ALSO use when the user says "task", "todo", "work item", "remind me to", "fix X", or any actionable work item — the goal system replaced the legacy `hivemind tasks` CLI and now covers both objectives and tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query the local AST-derived code graph (functions, classes, calls, imports) for structural codebase questions — what calls X, what does Y import, where is Z defined, blast radius of a change. The graph rebuilds automatically after each agent turn; use hivemind_graph_search and hivemind_graph_neighborhood tools (no manual build step).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, track and update team goals in Hivemind via the `hivemind` CLI. Use whenever the user mentions a goal, objective, target, milestone, or asks to track progress on something measurable. ALSO use when the user says "task", "todo", "work item", "remind me to", "fix X", or any actionable work item — the goal system replaced the legacy `hivemind tasks` CLI and now covers both objectives and tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query the local code graph (functions, classes, calls, imports) through the Deeplake mount at memory/graph/. Use when the user asks structural questions about the codebase — "what calls X?", "what does Y import?", "where is Z defined?", "what is the architecture / which subsystems exist?". The graph is an AST-derived map of the repo, queried as files (no build needed — it rebuilds automatically).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Query the local code graph (functions, classes, calls, imports) through the Deeplake mount at memory/graph/. Use when the user asks structural questions about the codebase — "what calls X?", "what does Y import?", "where is Z defined?", "what's the architecture / which subsystems exist?", "what's the impact of changing this?". The graph is an AST-derived map of the repo, queried as files (no build needed — it rebuilds automatically).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, track, and read team goals via Hivemind from openclaw. Use whenever the user mentions a goal, objective, target, milestone, or asks to track progress on something measurable. ALSO use when the user says "task", "todo", "work item", "remind me to", "fix X", or any actionable work item — the goal system replaced the legacy `hivemind tasks` CLI and now covers both objectives and tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to capture new reusable patterns into ktx's semantic layer - when a measure, segment, or join belongs in the catalog and how to write it generically so it stays small and useful over time. Loaded by the post-turn memory-agent only. The research agent does not write to the SL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use whenever a build emits or repairs .agentlas/routing-card.json — the shared card contract for the single-agent builder, the team builder, and the packager. States what belongs in every field, which fields the hub can actually match on, and which fields silently break matching when a sentence leaks into them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare azd-based Azure projects for deployment: generates azure.yaml, infrastructure (Bicep/Terraform), and Dockerfiles for the Azure Developer CLI (azd) workflow. USE ONLY when the user explicitly wants to use azd as the deployment tool, or the project already has an azure.yaml file. DO NOT USE FOR: non-azd deployments, Python App Service code-only deploys (use python-appservice-deploy), or cross-cloud migration (use azure-cloud-migrate). WHEN: prepare app for azd, create azure.yaml, set up azd infrastructure, modernize app for Azure with azd, deploy with azd, function app, timer trigger, service bus trigger, event-driven function, managed identity, generate Bicep, generate Terraform, create and deploy to Azure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and resources end to end. USE FOR: foundry, azd ai agent, azd provision/deploy, hosted agent scaffold/develop/run/deploy/troubleshoot, prompt agent create, managed harness agent create, GitHub Copilot harness agent, create agent, update agent, add tool to agent, invoke agent, agent insights, evaluate agent, batch eval, continuous eval, continuous monitoring, agent CI/CD, optimize prompt, improve prompt, optimize agent instructions, Agent Optimizer scaffold, dataset curation from traces, deploy model, model fine-tuning (SFT/DPO/RFT), Foundry project, RBAC, role assignment, permissions, quota, capacity, region, deployment failure, AI Services, create Foundry resource, knowledge index, customize deployment, onboard, availability, training-data, grader, distillation, large file upload. DO NOT USE FOR: Azure Functions, App Service, general Azure deploy (use azure-deploy), general Azure prep (use azure-prepare).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Send one of the user's own Minutes meetings to their X1 household for review. Use when the user wants a meeting's summary, decisions, action items, and open questions to reach X1 so they can confirm what belongs in their household record. X1 asks the user to approve the send, and nothing reaches the household record until they confirm each item. Never use it for a restricted meeting, a transcript, or someone else's meeting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Act as the user's live meeting sidekick inside the current terminal agent session. Use when the user explicitly asks you, the terminal agent, to watch a meeting, follow the live transcript, answer during the call, offer strategist thoughts, silently watch for risks, or track decisions. Do not use this skill to start or control the separate Minutes Coach HUD; explicit Coach or HUD lifecycle requests belong to minutes-copilot, and an ambiguous request such as "coach me live" requires one short surface clarification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Start and control Minutes Coach, the separate real-time copilot HUD, with an explicit meeting goal. Use only for explicit Coach or HUD lifecycle requests such as "start Minutes Coach", "open the Coach HUD", "pause Minutes Coach", "resume Minutes Coach", "Minutes Coach status", or "stop Minutes Coach". Do not use for requests that explicitly ask the current terminal agent to watch or strategize; those belong to minutes-live-sidekick. An ambiguous request such as "coach me live" requires one short surface clarification and must not automatically start Coach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。