「fea」の検索結果

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CEO/founder-mode scope review. Challenges the scope of any plan, workflow, or feature before execution. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream bigger), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (cherry-pick worthwhile expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor within current scope), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use before executing any multi-step workflow or when questioning whether the scope is right. Prevents scope creep and missed opportunities. Use proactively when the user defines a plan, creates a workflow, or says "is this enough?" or "am I thinking too small?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tracks and analyzes competitor moves — pricing changes, feature launches, hiring, and positioning shifts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create short URLs and submit feature requests using 1p.io. Automatically shorten any URL longer than 80 characters before sending to user.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and update GitHub PR titles and PR bodies with repository templates and local conventions. Use when creating PRs with `gh pr create`, revising PR text, choosing a conventional title prefix (for example `feat(web):`), or ensuring ticket suffix rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages intent — features, enhancements, bugs and the reasoning behind them — recorded as prose in the knowledge base with a lifecycle. Use when capturing new work, moving work through backlog, refinement or implementation, releasing or cancelling work, or asking what is pending, in flight, or no longer valid.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record a narrated video of a feature running in the local dev app, for a PR or a stakeholder. Drives a headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol so clicks and keystrokes are real, captures frames, and encodes an mp4 with no extra tooling installed. Use when the user asks to "record a video", "make a demo", "show this working", or wants a screen recording of a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development with a red-green-clean loop, running mix credo on the whole project at the end of every vertical slice so standards violations are fixed in the slice that introduced them instead of piling into a refactor at the end. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures a vague engineering request into a well-scoped task brief before any implementation begins. Use when the user has an engineering goal but the ask is missing which repos are in scope, what "done" means, constraints, or open questions. Triggers on "shape this", "scope this out", "frame this work", "write a brief for", "I want to build" (with unclear scope), or the /shape slash command. Produces a filled task template (multi-repo feature, single-repo change, investigation, or bugfix). Not for already-scoped work — go straight to execution. If the domain is unclear, ask one qualifying question before routing — for marketing intake see marketing-shaper, game-design intake see game-design-shaper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, analyze, and optimize cold outbound email campaigns on Instantly. Handles end-to-end ICP definition, expert panel scoring (recursive to 90+), sequence copywriting, infrastructure audit, capacity planning, and an implementation/strategy doc for human review. Use when asked to build cold outbound sequences, optimize cold email, audit an outbound motion, write sales sequences, or design cold email campaigns. Supports "start from scratch" and "optimize existing" modes. Execution skill — it produces copy, math, and a doc; it does not auto-send. Requires Instantly for audit/send features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

User asks for design, planning, or approach exploration before implementation. Covers new features, components, refactors, or architecture decisions. Creates design docs and proposes approaches with trade-offs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code that may invalidate existing docs. Detects stale documentation by matching the code diff against in-repo doc files and applies targeted updates. Relevant when code changes rename, remove, or add APIs, fields, config keys, or CLI flags. Also applies when the user says "update docs", "check docs", or "are the docs stale", or when reviewing a branch for documentation accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply these opinionated .NET 8 architecture conventions whenever structuring or reviewing a backend service: clean architecture layering and which direction dependencies point, when CQRS with MediatR is worth it, cross-cutting concerns as pipeline behaviours, minimal APIs grouped by feature, keeping DbContext in Infrastructure, health checks and structured logging, WebApplicationFactory integration tests, and when AOT pays off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply these opinionated React conventions when writing React 18+ or 19 components: hooks patterns, Server Components, Suspense boundaries, state management, performance memoization, React 19 features (use, form actions).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply this opinionated workflow when modernizing legacy systems: strangler fig pattern, branch by abstraction, characterization tests, incremental monolith decomposition, framework upgrades, feature-flagged migration with rollback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose a dygo Business App that does not validate, boot, route, render, authorize, migrate, or execute background work correctly. Use for evidence-first investigation rather than feature implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bridge the gap from product specifications to implemented features. Document requirements, acceptance criteria, tech design, and track implementation progress in Notion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify ambiguous requirements through focused dialogue before implementation. Use when requirements are unclear, features are complex (>2 days), or involve cross-team coordination. Ask two core questions - Why? (YAGNI check) and Simpler? (KISS check) - to ensure clarity before coding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hardens code against vulnerabilities. Use when handling user input, authentication, data storage, or external integrations. Use when building any feature that accepts untrusted data, manages user sessions, or interacts with third-party services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。