「only」の検索結果

Parallel map-reduce bulk ingest for large source sets. Map phase dispatches read-only knowledge-extractor agents (≤N-wide, default Haiku) emitting per-source JSON extracts; Python routes extracts by target library file (fuzzy-merging new topics, pre-allocating new files, flagging oversized topics); reduce phase dispatches one agent-knowledge-updater per file (parallel, one writer per file); single shelf-index rebuild + one log.md entry. Resumable. Supersedes kb-ingest-batch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the project knowledge base. Wraps the research-librarian agent. The librarian reads the shelf-index, identifies the 2-4 most relevant library files for the question, deep-reads only those, and returns structured evidence with citations. Stateless — reads the index fresh on every query.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide whether a protein has a pocket worth targeting, and where it is, before committing to a docking or design campaign. Use this skill to run fpocket cavity detection, rank cavities by druggability and volume, compare apo and holo conformations to spot induced fit, identify allosteric and cryptic cavities that only open in simulation, and convert a chosen cavity into the search box coordinates a docking run needs. Also trigger on fpocket, cavity detection, druggability score, alpha sphere, cryptic pocket, allosteric site, pocket volume, hotspot mapping, or undruggable target assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, responsive design, theming, and anti-patterns. Generate a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings. Report-only — documents issues for other skills to fix. Triggers on audit the design, check accessibility, technical review, performance audit, a11y check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective with Nielsen's heuristics scoring, anti-pattern detection, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Report-only. Triggers on critique, UX review, design feedback, how does this look, evaluate the design, component review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate 20,000+ particle swarm simulators in two modes: sandbox (complete Three.js host runtime with gesture controls, security validation, code injection pipeline) and sim (behavior function bodies that position/color particles via a sandboxed API). The AI writes ONLY a function body — the host handles rendering, input, and security. Triggers on particle swarm, swarm simulator, particle behavior, swarm sandbox, gesture particles, 20K particles, particle function body, swarm sim, particle playground.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, interaction states, and micro-details before shipping. Executes changes (unlike design-audit and design-critique which are report-only). Triggers on polish, finishing touches, final pass, something looks off, pre-launch, good to great.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cultivate edible and medicinal mushrooms from spawn through fruiting. Covers substrate preparation, inoculation methods, incubation conditions, fruiting chamber management, harvest timing, and successive flushes for oyster, shiitake, lion's mane, and other commonly cultivated species. Use when growing edible mushrooms without the risks of wild foraging, when a reliable supply of fresh culinary or medicinal mushrooms is needed, or when exploring mycelial ecology through hands-on cultivation practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize, extract, prune, and verify Claude Code persistent memory files. Covers MEMORY.md as a concise index, topic extraction to dedicated files, staleness detection, accuracy verification against project state, the dual 200-line / 25KB load cap, and reachability of topic files from the index. Use when MEMORY.md is approaching either load cap, after a session produces durable insights worth preserving, when a topic section has grown beyond 10-15 lines and should be extracted, when project state has changed and memory entries may be stale, or before and after rewriting the index so that no topic file loses its only pointer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply GitHub repository security protections tier by tier — rulesets, read-only Actions token, secret scanning + push protection, Dependabot, and (gated) required status checks / required PR with a GitHub App bypass for a CI auto-commit bot. Mutating and confirmation-gated: always assess first, apply the no-regret baseline, then decide required checks separately. Use when hardening a public user-owned repo after an audit, when a repo has no branch protection, when adding required checks without breaking a bot that pushes to the default branch, or when provisioning a GitHub App bypass actor for trusted automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify gate call variants in a minified JavaScript bundle. Covers context-window extraction around a flag occurrence, identification of 4–6 reader variants (sync boolean, sync config-object, bootstrap-aware TTL, truthy-only, async bootstrap, async bridge), default-value extraction (boolean / null / numeric / config-object literal), conjunction detection across `&&` predicates, kill-switch inversion detection, and production of a gate-mechanics record that feeds probe- feature-flag-state. Use when a flag's behavior cannot be inferred from its name alone, when the binary uses multiple reader libraries, or when config-object gates carry structured schemas distinct from boolean gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Statically enforce a privacy/redaction boundary on an artifact tree before publication, the way an AST checker enforces a code contract. Builds a two-tier gate — a shape-based deny-list (regex over identifier shapes) plus a structure-aware tier that parses JSON/HTML/SVG/Markdown/code and asserts sensitive content cannot appear in meaningful positions — with a strict exit-code contract, label-only output that never echoes the patterns themselves, and false-positive narrowing instead of suppressions. Use when gating a public mirror, a disclosure draft, a wire-capture export, or any artifact that must pass a leak check before it ships, and when a plain line-grep is too coarse to trust.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Solve Diophantine equations (integer-only solutions) including linear, quadratic, and Pell equations. Covers the extended Euclidean algorithm, descent methods, and existence proofs. Use when finding all integer solutions to ax + by = c, solving Pell's equation, generating Pythagorean triples, proving no integer solutions exist via modular constraints, or finding the fundamental solution from which all others are generated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Appraise gemstone value using the four Cs (color, clarity, cut, carat), origin assessment, treatment detection, and market factor analysis. Advisory educational guidance only — not a certified appraisal. Use when understanding factors that determine a gemstone's value, pre-screening stones before a professional appraisal, evaluating whether a seller's asking price is reasonable, learning gemstone grading methodology, or understanding how treatment status affects value.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only audit of a GitHub repository's security posture. Gathers ref protection (rulesets AND classic branch protection), Actions token permissions, code and supply-chain features (Dependabot, secret scanning, push protection, CodeQL), and repo hygiene toggles via `gh api`, then classifies findings against essential / recommended / advanced tiers into a PASS/GAP report. Makes NO changes. Use when reviewing a repo before open-sourcing or a release, auditing a public user-owned repo whose CI auto-commits to the default branch, verifying a hardening change actually took effect, or producing a baseline security posture report for a repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design human-visible, machine-readable website layers for AI assistants, RAG, and agentic search. Use this skill when the user asks for llms.txt, LLM discovery plans, visible TLDR or direct-answer blocks, source trails, entity pages, markdown alternates, AI crawler policy, topic-to-URL maps, assistant-readable public content, or LLM-friendly architecture that must preserve canonical SEO strategy without hidden bot-only facts or duplicate story bodies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a write-capable Kimi swarm that edits many disjoint targets in a throwaway worktree and returns a reviewable patch. Use only for explicit parallel edit fan-out requests; the plugin never applies or commits the patch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Re-render a stored event log for a completed plugin-managed Kimi job. Use only when the user explicitly asks to replay a Kimi job.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an independent read-only Kimi review over the current working tree or a branch diff. Use when the user wants a second reviewer for defects, regressions, or implementation risks, not edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cancel an active plugin-managed Kimi job for the current repository. Use only when the user explicitly asks to cancel a Kimi run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Kimi's autonomous goal mode for an explicitly requested hands-off multi-turn objective. This is write-capable and budget-bounded; use only when the user explicitly asks Kimi to pursue an objective autonomously.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask Kimi a read-only free-form question about the current repository. Use for prose explanations, flow tracing, module comparisons, or conceptual reasoning where Codex should delegate the answer to local kimi-code rather than perform implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate a bounded write-capable investigation or implementation task to Kimi through the companion runtime. Use only when explicitly invoked or when the user clearly asks to hand off a substantial fix to Kimi.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep cross-domain synthesis engine for the vault. Triggers on "synthesize X", "what do I know about X", "connect ideas about X", "cross-domain analysis of X", "map everything in the vault about X". Searches comprehensively, surfaces non-obvious patterns and tensions, then challenges the user to generate original thought. The vault should surprise you — if synthesis only confirms what you already think, it failed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。