3,242 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Coverage review and verification sufficiency routing. Use when test coverage, uncovered paths, coverage reports, or verification adequacy need a read-only QA review; do not use for writing tests or running browser/E2E artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a bounded security design/hardening pass for explicit security or threat-model intent, or a concrete auth/authorization/secret/untrusted-input/file-upload/sensitive-data risk; do not trigger for every input, data store, third-party call, implementation, review, or release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure source-grounded consulting-style analysis for strategy, market, product, operations, or decision memos. Use for MECE problem framing, hypotheses, options, tradeoffs, executive recommendations, or "consulting analysis" requests; do not use for legal/financial advice, implementation, data computation, chart rendering, or unsourced business claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review comment, JSDoc, TODO, README, and docs-to-code factual consistency, stale or low-value comments, and Chinese comment/variable appropriateness; do not use for general code review, broad documentation rewrites, or auto-editing comments without approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simplify a bounded code area when the user explicitly requests behavior-preserving refactoring or a named complexity/readability problem is the accepted task; do not trigger automatically after implementation, during every review, for adjacent cleanup, or when behavior may change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code-review quality gate and test-enhancement rubric. Use when ROSE needs sharper review output contracts, severity and risk prioritization, evidence anchors, negative review cases, fixture or golden-output drift guidance, or a Chinese review report profile; do not use as a duplicate code-review agent or final PASS authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the AILI delivery lifecycle from natural-language IDEATE, DEFINE, BUILD, and SHIP intent or the equivalent slash shortcuts; use for idea shaping, spec/test definition, bounded BUILD package queues, review-repair closeout, or adapter routing without exposing internal stage commands.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI regression scouting routing. Use when agents, prompts, skills, model/tool routing, harness fixtures, or generated-output expectations change and need regression scenarios; do not use for ordinary product-code regressions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a single academic paper, preprint, DOI, arXiv link, or user-provided PDF/text with source-grounded critique. Use for paper summaries, methodology review, novelty checks, reproducibility concerns, or "review this paper" requests; do not use for multi-paper surveys, systematic literature reviews, citation management, or implementation from a paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Android native Kotlin/Compose app development, Material 3 UI, accessibility, and Gradle builds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides stable API and interface design. Use when designing APIs, module boundaries, or any public interface. Use when creating REST or GraphQL endpoints, defining type contracts between modules, or establishing boundaries between frontend and backend.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct one bounded evidence-grounded code review when the user explicitly requests review or ROSE names a concrete unresolved correctness/quality risk; do not trigger automatically after implementation, before every merge, for every bug fix/refactor, or as a completion gate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure or modify concrete CI/CD pipelines, jobs, quality gates, test runners, or deployment automation; do not trigger merely because an existing CI gate failed or ordinary source code needs repair.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, critique, or specify honest charts and data visualizations from known data and audience needs. Use for chart selection, misleading-chart audits, accessibility, dashboard visuals, or "make this data easier to understand"; do not use for raw data analysis, PPT deck generation, spreadsheet surgery, or fabricated chart data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optional focused post-implementation review routing. Use only when the user requests review or the changed surface has a clear specialist evidence need that direct diff inspection and the smallest relevant check cannot cover. Never creates an automatic review swarm.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, edit, fix, or explain Mermaid diagrams for relationships, decision branches, interactions, lifecycles, and data models; also use when the parent selects a diagram to materially clarify an explanation. Do not trigger for simple status, one fact, short lists, quantitative charts, or marketing slides.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research one bounded mature-project/prior-art question when the user explicitly asks how established projects handle it or ROSE names a decision-shaping prior-art gap; do not trigger automatically for IDEATE, DEFINE, BUILD, implementation, local review, or every design choice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build native iOS apps with SwiftUI, UIKit, SnapKit, Apple HIG, accessibility, and platform UI patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement an accepted change in bounded dependency-ordered increments when the user requests implementation and the scope benefits from multiple coherent slices; do not trigger merely because work touches multiple files, changes behavior, or is over an arbitrary line count.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refines raw ideas through structured divergent and convergent thinking for ordinary non-command brainstorming, idea shaping, options comparison, and explicit IDEATE deepening routed by `aili-delivery-flow`; do not use as the top-level `/ideate` command owner or for existing-plan stress-test, review, or completion-claim checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
将已有中文论文正文、报告、邮件、说明或 PPT 文案改得自然、减少 AI 腔与模板感；用于明确的“说人话”、自然化改写或论文 AIGC 风险段落处理，不用于自动润色所有回答、从零代写论文、英文改写、概念教学、事实核查、检测分数保证或 PPTX 文件生成。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose user-reported AILI/ROSE harness or workflow behavior problems without editing files; use when the user says a command, skill trigger, subagent packet, memory flow, installer, docs, or agent prompt behavior is wrong and wants to know where the issue lives and how to fix it. Do not use for normal product-code bugs; return any approved modification need to ROSE.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce or apply an approved report-first proposal for workflow, ROSE, skill, command, subagent, memory, install, or harness-doc changes; use after harness-issue-triage localizes a harness problem or when the user explicitly requests harness maintenance, and do not edit core harness files without explicit human approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs read-only GitHub issue or PR triage with evidence links. Use when analyzing public or repository GitHub issues/PRs without mutating labels, comments, branches, reviews, merges, or issue state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。