4,758 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Exposes Claude's reasoning chain as an auditable, decomposable artifact. Quick mode (default) gives assumption inventory + weakest-link in 2 stages. Full mode (--full) adds decision branching, confidence decomposition, and falsification conditions. Triggers on "왜 그렇게 생각해", "reasoning", "근거", "show your work", "어떻게 그 결론이", "trace", "판단 근거", "why do you think that".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate probability-weighted alternative options that challenge default thinking. Forces unconventional alternatives and exposes hidden assumptions behind the "obvious" choice. For decision-point analysis, NOT full design exploration. Triggers on "대안", "alternatives", "옵션 뽑아", "options", "어떤 방법이", "아이디어", "다른 방법", "선택지".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Devil's Advocate stress-testing for code, architecture, PRs, and decisions. Surfaces hidden flaws through structured adversarial analysis with metacognitive depth. Use for high-stakes review, stress-testing choices, or when the user wants problems found deliberately. NOT for routine code review. Triggers on "스트레스 테스트", "stress test", "devil's advocate", "반론", "이거 괜찮아", "문제 없을까", "깊은 리뷰", "critical review", "adversarial".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prospective failure analysis using Gary Klein's pre-mortem technique. Assumes complete failure, works backward to identify risks, leading indicators, and circuit breakers. Counters optimism bias by forcing systematic exploration of failure modes before they materialize. Use for project plans, architecture decisions, technology adoption, business strategy, or feature launches. Triggers on "리스크", "위험", "실패하면", "swing-mortem", "뭐가 잘못될 수 있어", "risk", "what could go wrong", "걱정되는 점", "failure modes", "리스크 분석", "위험 분석".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用户面临"该加强还是该削减""该投入还是该撤出"的二元方向决策时; 当系统出现某方面过强某方面过弱的失衡时; 当需要判断失衡方向并确定 纠正方向时。不适用于: 没有失衡的分析场景、纯信息查询、 问题只有单一变量没有对立面的情况。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Used when the user asks to "create a PowerPoint", "generate PPTX slides", "make a PowerPoint presentation", "build a .pptx deck", "create editable slides", "PptxGenJS", "editable presentation", "corporate deck", "slide deck for sharing", or when the output format is PPTX for any presentation task. Also triggers on "export to PowerPoint", "pitch deck PPTX", "offline presentation", or when the context implies an editable/corporate format. Generates OOXML-compliant .pptx files with PptxGenJS, precise layout, text measurement, and overlap validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process unhandled Slack messages as Claudicle with persistent memory. Loads user models and soul state, posts terminal-styled thinking messages, generates cognitive-step responses, updates memory based on mentalQuery decisions. Requires Session Bridge listener running.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research UI component patterns across the component.gallery corpus — 60 canonical component types, ~95 production design systems, 2,600+ examples — plus an AI-era overlay (prompt inputs, tool-call cards, streaming status, citations) and composite patterns (command palette, app shell, agent console). Compare implementations, find alternative component names, ground frontend decisions in real-world precedent. Pairs with minoan-frontend-design for research-then-build workflows. Triggers on component patterns, how do others implement X, design system research, component comparison, AI chat components, agent UI patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Edit images with precision using ImageMagick 7, sips, transparent-background, and Pillow — with intelligent routing to AI semantic editing (Gemini/nano-banana-pro) for content-aware operations. Covers cropping, resizing, compositing, annotating, format conversion, color adjustment, background removal, batch processing, and montage creation. Triggers on image editing, crop, resize, composite, annotate, remove background, format conversion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build or update a CONTEXT.md domain glossary for the current project. Establishes shared vocabulary with term definitions, avoid-aliases, and relationships so agents use consistent, concise language. This skill should be used when starting a new project, when domain terminology is inconsistent across sessions, when the user says "build a glossary", "define our terms", "shared vocabulary", or "domain language", or when an existing CONTEXT.md needs updating after new domain concepts emerge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, audit, and maintain CLAUDE.md documentation files that configure Claude Code for projects. Use this skill when (1) initializing a new project with Claude Code configuration, (2) reviewing or improving existing CLAUDE.md files, (3) organizing project instructions using progressive disclosure patterns, (4) converting repeated instructions into permanent documentation, or (5) setting up agent_docs/ structures for larger codebases. Handles the WHAT/WHY/HOW framework, conciseness optimization, and file import patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when stress-testing a proposal, plan, architecture or decision before committing to it, such as pre-mortems, assumption audits, "should we even do this?" questions, or when everyone agrees too easily. Not for code review; it challenges strategy, approach and hidden risks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep, iterative, multi-source research that explores a topic from multiple perspectives, detects contradictions, and produces a comprehensive vault note with fact-level citations and a confidence map. Use this skill whenever the user says /deep-research, "deep research X", "research X thoroughly", "investigate X deeply", "I need to really understand X", or wants research that goes beyond a quick web search. Also use when the user wants to understand a complex, contested, or multi-faceted topic, compare competing approaches with evidence, or build a comprehensive mental model they can trust for decisions. This is heavier than /research — it searches web, academic papers, Reddit, and the vault, then loops through exploration and critique rounds until the evidence base is solid. When in doubt between /research and /deep-research, prefer this one if the topic is complex, contested, or the user wants depth over speed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a launch needs a go/no-go decision with rollback and monitoring evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent Brain /brain-research: the decision depends on external evidence or unfamiliar domain context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent Brain /brain-review: after verification or before public/shipping decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes Claude Project context budget under the automatic-RAG-by-window model: knowledge files vs. threshold-exempt overhead (Skills, MCPs, CI, Memory). Two modes: Quick Diagnostic and Full Budget Audit. Use when user says "check my context budget," "how much context am I using," "is my project too big," "optimize my token usage," "tier my files," "optimize for RAG," "improve retrieval quality," "should I keep compressing," "am I over-compressing," "should I accept RAG mode." Also trigger on context pressure symptoms: "Claude forgets my instructions," "responses getting generic," "content not found in my knowledge files." Also use when a project audit scores Knowledge Architecture ≤ 3. Do NOT use for content placement decisions (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available), full project audits (use rootnode-project-audit if available), or behavioral tuning (use rootnode-behavioral-tuning if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Selects the active profile from triggering context. Evaluates a rule set against inputs (current time, calendar state, geofence, manual command, custom signals) and returns the profile name that consuming Skills (handoff-trigger-check, critic-gate, future Skills) should apply. Configuration-driven; rule set lives in a router config file conforming to the included schema. Deterministic precedence — manual override beats calendar beats time-window beats default. Required default profile guarantees a routing decision always exists. Use when an orchestrator needs to pick a profile automatically rather than having the caller specify one, when wiring calendar/time/Telegram triggers to gate behavior, or when a Skill's behavior should change with availability mode. Trigger on: "what profile should I use," "route to a profile," "which mode am I in," "auto-select profile," "active mode," "current profile." Do NOT use to evaluate work readiness or review proposed changes. Always returns a profile name.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces structured markdown session continuation documents for multi-session workflows. Captures active work streams, decisions with rationale, knowledge-file deltas learned during the session, the exact files to load next conversation, ingested content, artifacts, and open items into an ingestion-optimized handoff. Carries pending KF updates and unresolved items forward across handoff chains so context never drops. Generates a closeout checklist and echoes the starter prompt to chat. Use when approaching context limits, wrapping up a session, or managing work across conversations. Trigger on: "create a handoff," "session closeout," "wrap up this session," "build session handoff," "BSH," "continue next session," "we're running out of context," "context is getting long." Do NOT use for Memory optimization, context budget analysis, project audits, deciding whether work is ready for autonomous/Claude Code execution (use rootnode-handoff-trigger-check), or summaries with no continuation intent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates a structured Project Brief — a comprehensive markdown document that extracts goals, architecture, knowledge file inventory, Custom Instructions summary, Memory contents, current state, ecosystem position, and key decisions from a Claude Project. Briefs serve as uploadable context documents: add one to any other Project for immediate deep awareness of the source Project's purpose, architecture, and progress. Use when user says "create a brief," "brief this project," "extract project context," "generate a project summary for another project," "I need to share this project's context," "prepare this project for cross-project reference," or "document this project." Also use when the user is preparing to work across Projects and needs portable context. Do NOT use for session handoffs, project audits, or Memory optimization (use rootnode-session-handoff, rootnode-project-audit, or rootnode-memory-optimization respectively, if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses and fixes Claude behavioral issues in system prompts and Projects using tested countermeasure templates. Use when "Claude is too verbose," "keeps hedging," "agrees with everything," "claims it did something it didn't," "won't use a tool," "fix Claude's output," "tune Claude's behavior," "Claude ignores my preferences," "adds unsolicited disclaimers," "uses too many lists." Covers ten tendencies: agreeableness (output-content + persistent-preference), hedging, verbosity, list overuse, fabricated precision, over-exploration, tool miscalibration (over- and under-triggering), LaTeX defaulting, editorial drift, self-referential fabrication. Also use when auditing a system prompt for behavioral calibration or recalibrating a pre-4.7 prompt, and when users describe recurring output problems without naming a tendency. Do NOT use for scoring a prompt's overall quality — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit, classify, and selectively forget stored memories. Covers memory enumeration and classification by type/age/access frequency, staleness detection for outdated references, fidelity checks using external anchors, a decision tree for selective withdrawal, tombstoned deaccession so removed content stays recoverable, counter-memory inoculation for failed strategies that would otherwise be re-derived, preemptive filtering rules for what should never become memories, and an audit trail so forgetting itself is reviewable. Use when memory has grown large and uncurated, when project state has shifted significantly since memories were written, when retrieval quality has degraded, or as periodic maintenance alongside manage-memory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide a person through a Coordinate Remote Viewing (CRV) session following the Stargate/SRI protocol. AI acts as the monitor/tasker role, managing protocol progression, catching Analytical Overlay (AOL), and redirecting the viewer through stages I-VI. Use when a person wants to practice CRV and needs a monitor to manage the session protocol, when training a viewer through the staged CRV process, facilitating a structured intuitive perception exercise, or developing non-local awareness skills that complement healing work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。