6,640 件 ・ 関連度順
Use when turning results into an explicit theoretical contribution for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — the "what new theory do we learn?" statement and the discussion section. Frames the contribution and implications; it does not build the original theory (amj-theory-development) or run the analysis (amj-data-analysis).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to understand or set expectations for the Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) editorial and peer-review process — desk review, the developmental multi-round R&R culture, and reading a decision letter. Explains the process and how to read decisions; it does not draft the response letter (amj-rebuttal).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when stress-testing the LOGIC of an Academy of Management Review (AMR) theory manuscript — checking logical coherence, running thought experiments and counterfactuals, addressing alternative explanations and disconfirming cases, and verifying each proposition follows from its argument. This is ARGUMENT DEVELOPMENT, NOT data analysis; AMR publishes no datasets, no statistics, and no empirical results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning around the two-step proposal→invited-review process of the Academy of Management Annals (Annals) — the twice-yearly proposal cadence, double-blind proposal review, the editor-only full-review development, and timelines. Explains the process; it does not write the proposal (amann-proposal-framing) or run the portal preflight (amann-submission).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when articulating and differentiating the theoretical contribution of an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — showing precisely what is NEW versus prior theory and why it matters. Frames the contribution; it does NOT build the theory (amr-theory-development) or check its internal logic (amr-data-analysis).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the front end of an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript needs to engage the right literatures and stake a clear position in an ongoing theoretical conversation. Positions the paper among theories; it does not derive the hypotheses (amj-theory-development) or write the contribution paragraph (amj-contribution-framing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting the revision and response letter after an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) revise-and-resubmit — structuring point-by-point responses to the action editor and reviewers across a multi-round developmental process. Drafts the response after revisions; it does not interpret the decision letter (amj-review-process).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the theoretical argument and hypotheses are the bottleneck for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — building a mechanism and deriving testable hypotheses a priori. Constructs the theory; it does not run the analysis (amj-data-analysis) or write the final contribution paragraph (amj-contribution-framing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security audit of Solidity code while you develop. Trigger on "audit", "check this contract", "review for security", "loop mode", "run the auditor in loop mode", "run 3 passes". Modes - default (full repo) or a specific filename. Loop mode runs several passes in one scan, each pass told what the earlier ones found, and ends in one combined report; it remembers findings between scans in a ledger.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates an x-ray.md pre-audit report covering overview, enhanced threat model (protocol-type profiling, git-weighted attack surfaces, temporal risk analysis, composability dependency mapping), invariants, integrations, docs quality, test analysis, and developer/git history. Triggers on 'x-ray', 'audit readiness', 'readiness report', 'pre-audit report', 'prep this protocol', 'protocol prep', 'summarize this protocol'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review generated or changed WordPress code — plugins, themes, and blocks — before it ships. Best used reactively after an agent writes, edits, or reviews code touching WordPress APIs: add_action/add_filter, shortcodes, meta boxes, AJAX handlers, REST routes, WP_Query or $wpdb, widgets, or WP-CLI commands. Use on 'review this plugin', 'is this safe to ship', 'make this translatable', 'speed up this query', or after tasks like 'write a plugin' or 'add an endpoint/shortcode/meta box'. Enforces escaping and sanitization, nonces plus capability checks, prepared database queries, core-API-first development, translation-ready strings, and query/caching discipline. DO NOT USE for WooCommerce-specific order, product, or checkout logic (use woo-guard), non-WordPress PHP, generic code quality review (use clean-code-guard), test code review (use test-guard), server or hosting configuration, or conceptual WordPress questions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn new AI names or unstructured AI market signals into a keyword priority table. For each name it finds the generic search terms downstream of it, screens them for relevance, and checks novelty, demand size and momentum against Google Ads volume and Google Trends, ending in prioritize, watch or skip. Use when the user has new model, product or repository names (or an AI listening report, a batch of posts, a changelog) and asks which keywords to build pages or tools for. Runs the new-term-radar command line; needs an AISA_API_KEY, and a GOANYAPI_API_KEY improves it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prove a language switch translates what the user sees, keeps what they had already typed, and is still in force after a reload. Use when i18n, a locale picker, a language menu or translation files were added or changed, when a string is suspected of staying in the old language or showing a raw translation key, or when a user reports losing their form or their language choice after switching or refreshing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prove a UI that updates before the server answers puts things back and says so when the request fails, and keeps the change when it succeeds. Use when a like, toggle, rename, reorder, delete or add-to-cart updates instantly, when an optimistic update was added or changed, or when a user reports a change that "saved" but was gone after a reload.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test-driven development for behaviour a unit test cannot reach, by writing the expectation against the running app before writing the code. Declare the consequence first, watch it fail, implement, watch it pass. Use when building a user-facing feature, when the user asks for TDD on UI or full-stack work, when a unit test cannot express the outcome that matters, or when you want a red-green loop that runs against the real app instead of mocks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Governs Microsoft Fabric OneLake catalog health, protection, and trust through Fabric Admin, Core, and Power BI REST APIs. Use for tenant or owner-scoped audits and guarded remediation of domains, workspace assignment, capacity, labels, tags, descriptions, refresh, and item identity. Catalog item discovery belongs to search-consumption-cli.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Governs Event Schema Sets, the Fabric registries of event types and message payload schemas. Covers create, rename, update and delete of a definition, and listing, property reads or base64 decoding. Every Event Schema Set task belongs here. Ingestion pipelines are eventstream-cli.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages a Fabric SQL database item, the OLTP SQL Server engine, including running T-SQL through sqlcmd, temporal and vector similarity search, schema and sys.tables inspection, dacpac deployment, and Query Store, blocked sessions and regressed-plan investigation. Use for any query or change against a SQL database item. Warehouse, lakehouse SQL endpoint and mirrored items belong to sqldw-cli.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages Fabric Spark work, including notebook cell code with %%configure, %%sql, PySpark and notebookutils, named notebook runs, Livy sessions, triage of failed or OOM notebook and pipeline Spark runs, and the Materialized Lake View (MLV) lifecycle. Load it before writing MLV SQL, since CREATE MATERIALIZED LAKE VIEW and its CONSTRAINT clause are Fabric-only. KQL materialized views belong to eventhouse-cli.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authors and queries Fabric Eventhouse and KQL databases: tables, functions, policies, materialized views, ingestion, and read-only KQL for real-time and time-series analytics. All KQL database work belongs here, table creation and simple queries included. An Eventstream item is eventstream-cli; an Event Schema Set is eventschemaset-cli.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate Xcode build optimization by benchmarking first, running the specialist analysis skills, prioritizing findings, requesting explicit approval, delegating approved fixes to xcode-build-fixer, and re-benchmarking after changes. Use when a developer wants an end-to-end build optimization workflow, asks to speed up Xcode builds, wants a full build audit, or needs a recommend-first optimization pass covering compilation, project settings, and packages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Benchmark Xcode clean and incremental builds with repeatable inputs, timing summaries, and timestamped `.build-benchmark/` artifacts. Use when a developer wants a baseline, wants to compare before and after changes, asks to measure build performance, mentions build times, build duration, how long builds take, or wants to know if builds got faster or slower.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit Xcode project configuration, build settings, scheme behavior, and script phases to find build-time improvements with explicit approval gates. Use when a developer wants project-level build analysis, slow incremental builds, guidance on target dependencies, build settings review, run script phase analysis, parallelization improvements, or module-map and DEFINES_MODULE configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply approved Xcode build optimization changes following best practices, then re-benchmark to verify improvement. Use when a developer has an approved optimization plan from xcode-build-orchestrator, wants to apply specific build fixes, needs help implementing build setting changes, script phase guards, source-level compilation fixes, or SPM restructuring that was recommended by an analysis skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。