4,586 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when the user says 'set up respira', 'respira not connecting', 'check my respira connection', or 'fix respira'. Walks through first-time setup and diagnoses connection failures: timeouts, 401s, 403s, and plugin or server version mismatches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user says 'build internal links', 'improve internal linking', 'fix orphaned pages', or 'create topic clusters'. Analyzes all published content, maps topic relationships, and presents a linking plan for approval before changing anything.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the repo's lint, format-check and test suite, then fix anything that fails. Use before opening a PR or when asked to "polish" or "clean up" the repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and rewrite a Threads (Meta) profile end-to-end for 2026: profile photo, name with a searchable keyword, @handle, bio (150 chars, warm and specific), link, pinned post, and the connected-Instagram cross-pull that feeds Threads discovery. Triggers on "review my Threads profile", "fix my Threads bio", "what to pin on Threads", and "profile audit". Turns a default profile into one that converts visitors into followers. Not for writing posts (use threads-post-writer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize web performance for faster loading and better user experience. Use when the task involves `speed up my site`, `optimize performance`, `reduce load time`, `fix slow loading`, `improve page speed`, or `performance audit`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize for search engine visibility and ranking. Use when the task involves `improve SEO`, `optimize for search`, `fix meta tags`, `add structured data`, `sitemap optimization`, or `search engine optimization`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vitest fast unit testing framework powered by Vite with Jest-compatible API. Use when writing tests, mocking, configuring coverage, or working with test filtering and fixtures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive code simulation engine that spawns ghost personas to review your code before it ships. Each ghost walks through your code line-by-line from a different failure perspective: The Adversary (race conditions, double-submit, idempotency), The Enterprise Edge (business logic gaps, multi-currency, B2B tax exemptions, locale), Chaos Monkey (timeouts, partial failures, network partitions, OOM). Produces a chaos timeline, structured bug report with severity ratings, and three resolution tiers (quick fix, robust architecture, generated test suite). Use this skill whenever the user mentions code review, PR review, "find bugs", "what could go wrong", "will this break", "is this safe", "stress test", "edge cases", design review, pre-merge check, dry run, chaos test, or wants a second opinion on any code — even if they don't explicitly ask for "ghost personas" or "simulation". Also trigger when someone pastes a code snippet with any question about its correctness or safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hot-reload a Python function implementation from the latest file content without restarting the process. Use this to apply code fixes live after identifying a bug with watch/trace.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for coding, PR delivery, scaffolding and QA. Triggers: develop, fix, refactor, test, review, docs, browse, stacked PR, 개발, 수정, 검토, 스택 PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for frontend code and UI fixes. Triggers: CSS, responsive, animation, React, Vue, Svelte, Tailwind, redesign, anti-slop, 프론트엔드, UI 작업, 반응형, 디자인 수정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simulate rigorous, fair peer review on a paper — in two modes. (A) Red-team YOUR OWN draft before submission to predict the reviews you'll get and get a fix list. (B) Review SOMEONE ELSE'S paper when you're an assigned reviewer or helping your advisor — produce a fair, venue-formatted, submission-ready review. Use whenever the user gives a paper (PDF, .tex, .md, arXiv link, or pasted text) and wants to predict reviews, find weaknesses before reviewers do, stress-test a submission, OR write a real review of another paper. Grounded in official NeurIPS/ICLR/ACL reviewer guidelines; every criticism pinned to a location, and checked against ACL's H1–H17 list of illegitimate critiques. 两种模式:审自己的稿(投稿前红队)/ 审别人的稿(当审稿人或帮导师),按会议官方标准评,绝不脑补、绝不发不正当批评。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a short, honest account of where using Mycelium was confusing or slow, for the user to edit and choose whether to send. Reports experience; never prescribes fixes. Based on Hoskins's friction logging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Render a completed diamond's work as a shareable, factual one-page "work receipt" (problem framed, assumptions tested, what was killed vs kept) carrying an origin line + a volitional onward-handoff data flow. Read-only. Consults the attribution registry per `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/engine/render-conventions.md` consent + privacy gate. Follows the render fleet's shared conventions + consent gate (Check 43 applies via the `-render` name); a standalone shareable-artifact generator, NOT a `/render` dispatcher target. Audience fixed `external` (a hand-it-over artifact).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose CircleCI failures for a branch, PR, and scheduled nightly builds. Use when asked to check CI, a build, or nightly; report evidence and suggested fixes without opening a PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add or update automated tests for a change using the repository’s verification rules in `AGENTS.md`. Use when implementing a feature, bugfix, refactor, or regression test; prefer stable integration/API/UI coverage and pull deeper test strategy from the bundled references.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the open-source free `Roslynator` analyzer packages and optional CLI for .NET. Use when a repo wants broad C# static analysis, auto-fix flows, dead-code detection, optional CLI checks, or extra rules beyond the SDK analyzers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the free first-party `dotnet format` CLI for .NET formatting and analyzer fixes. Use when a .NET repo needs formatting commands, `--verify-no-changes` CI checks, or `.editorconfig`-driven code style enforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply whenever writing or editing source code in any core's build agent (backend-eng, ui-builder, or equivalent). Governs when a comment belongs at all and what it may say. Default is no comment; a comment is only for the non-obvious. Never restates what the code does, never narrates the task, fix, or conversation that produced it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintainer-only. Use when triaging inbound GitHub issues and pull requests on skyf0xx/hedgehog — "triage the issues", "check the PRs", "review inbound", "what's in the queue". Reads each item read-only, judges it for security and for whether it is real, then fixes and closes or comments and closes. Not part of the Hedgehog discipline a consuming project copies; this only applies to the Hedgehog repo itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a change request lands on a project that already has `.hedgehog/` and no build in flight — a finished build being adjusted, or an adopted repo's next piece of work. Triggers on any "change this", "fix this", "add this" on such a project. Sizes the request against the installed core's own layers and routes it to one of three exits: a tweak made and committed here, change-work through `hedgehog intent add` and the core's loop, or a re-plan. Not for a build still in progress — that is the core's loop skill's own job.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when uncommitted changes need to be split into atomic, conventional commits ordered for review. Triggers on "commit this", "make commits", "clean up commits", "commit the changes". In Hedgehog, each Loop step is already meant to be its own commit — this skill matters most when a Correction Protocol fast-forward touches several steps at once and those fixes need splitting back into per-step commits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits Stitch-generated components for WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility issues and applies fixes — semantic HTML, ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, focus management, and screen reader support.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic, hypothesis-driven debugging workflow with triage-based track routing. Use for debugging, fixing bugs, and investigating errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。