4,079 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Browser automation CLI for agents: navigate, click/fill, screenshot, extract data, test apps, Electron/Slack, cloud browsers. NOT for the user's real Chrome profile/cookies (mk:chrome-profile).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build error triage: detect language, load fix patterns, auto-retry. Chains into mk:verify. NOT for runtime errors (mk:fix); NOT for architecture debugging (mk:investigate).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer factual project questions (codebase, architecture) with cited evidence. NOT for brainstorming, trade-offs (mk:party), debugging (mk:investigate), review (mk:review), or plans (mk:plan-creator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ship workflow with explicit scopes: prepare stages and commits locally; release pushes and creates a PR; publish manages issues and versioning. Use when asked to "ship", "deploy", "push to main", "create a PR", or "merge and push". Proactively suggest when the user says code is ready or asks about deploying. Supports official (→ main) and beta (→ dev/develop) ship modes with auto-detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a decision needs deep multi-source technical research with cited evidence — technology evaluation, ecosystem comparison, standards/spec fact-finding, "how do others solve X". Triggers on "research X", "deep dive on X", "evaluate X vs Y", "find best practices for X". NOT for library/API doc lookup (see mk:docs-finder); NOT for one-shot URL fetch (see mk:web-to-markdown); NOT for internal codebase discovery (see mk:scout); NOT for project-only Q&A (see mk:ask-me); NOT for comparing solution designs (see mk:brainstorming); NOT for root-cause debugging (see mk:investigate); NOT for wiki ingestion of sources (see mk:wiki-research).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-pass structural code review with adversarial analysis, scope-aware dispatch, adversarial persona passes, and forced-finding protocol. Supports input modes: branch diff (default), PR number (#123), commit hash, pending changes (--pending). Use when asked to "review this PR", "code review", "pre-landing review", "check my diff", or "review #123". Proactively suggest when the user is about to merge or land code changes. NOT for behavioral verification against a running build (see mk:evaluate); NOT for post-implementation simplification (see mk:simplify).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Session-persistent browser automation via Playwright CLI — form filling, screenshots, data extraction, multi-step flows. Use when the user needs to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information across multiple requests. NOT for AI-driven long-autonomous flows (see mk:agent-browser); NOT for generating .spec.ts E2E code (see mk:qa-manual).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spec-driven manual QA testing and Playwright E2E code generation. Orchestrates browser skills to navigate apps like a human tester, producing structured test reports or production-ready .spec.ts files. Always prompts user for credentials — never guesses or stores auth. Use for QA testing, E2E generation, login flow testing, or exploratory testing from a URL. NOT for AI-autonomous flows (see mk:agent-browser).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve an in-progress git merge or rebase conflict end to end: read the conflict state, recover each side's original intent, resolve every hunk, run the project's checks, and prepare the merge/rebase for an explicitly approved finish. Use when asked to "resolve merge conflicts", "fix this rebase", "finish the merge", or when `git status` shows conflicted (unmerged) paths. NOT for the full ship pipeline that merges the base branch first (see mk:ship); NOT for debugging a runtime bug or test failure unrelated to a conflict (see mk:investigate / mk:fix).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runtime router for context decisions during a task — decide read-more / stop / ask / assume / delegate, pick a minimal read-set, and time compaction. Front-page mental model is Write / Select / Compress / Isolate; a lazy pattern index routes to 25 context-engineering patterns, one reference per decision. Use when context is near budget, a long session is degrading, you must choose what to read for a task, or you are deciding /compact vs /clear vs a sub-agent. NOT for structural .claude/ overhead audits (see mk:context-audit); NOT for owning persistence (see mk:memory); NOT for USD cost (see mk:budget).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when surfacing architectural friction and proposing deepening refactors (shallow modules → deep modules) for testability and AI-navigability. Triggers on "improve architecture", "find deepening opportunities", "where is this codebase shallow", "architecture review". Emits structured candidates + precise patches; delegates ALL rendering to mk:preview. NOT for diagram/HTML rendering (see mk:preview); NOT for trade-off deliberation (see mk:party); NOT for plan critique (see mk:plan-ceo-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses and fixes bugs, type errors, lint failures, CI/CD issues, and runtime errors via root-cause-first investigation. Use for defect remediation. NOT for investigation without a fix (see mk:investigate); NOT for build-only compilation errors (see mk:build-fix).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when answering factual or explanatory questions about the current project — codebase, architecture, conventions, workflows, constraints — with minimal cited evidence. Triggers on "how does X work here", "what does X mean", "why is X structured this way", "is this claim true in the repo", "explain X with sources". NOT for brainstorming or comparing approaches (mk:brainstorming), trade-off decisions (mk:party), debugging/root cause (mk:investigate), code review (mk:review), plans (mk:plan-creator), security audits (mk:cso), visual explanations/diagrams (mk:preview --explain), test-coverage gaps (mk:nyquist), library docs (mk:docs-finder), or workflow navigation (mk:help).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build error triage: detect language, load fix patterns, auto-retry. Use for 'build failed', 'fix compilation', 'type error'. Chains into mk:verify. NOT for runtime errors (see mk:fix); NOT for architectural debugging (see mk:investigate).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a raw idea into ONE honest recommendation: interview one question at a time until the problem, requirements, goals, non-goals, and constraints are CONFIRMED, then deliver a single verdict — do, don't, cheaper alternatives, trade-offs, ordered checklist, success metrics. Required: the user wants exactly ONE recommendation — not options, not a debate — and their framing is open to challenge (advise may answer a different question than the one asked). Triggers on "what should I do about X", "advise me on X", "am I approaching this right", "is this the right move". Do NOT use to be interrogated with no recommendation (→ mk:grill) — advise also interviews one question at a time, but only to reach a verdict. Do NOT use when the framing is settled and only the options are open (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to decide whether something is worth building (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when you want several perspectives to argue it out (→ mk:party).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chief Security Officer mode. Infrastructure-first security audit: secrets archaeology, dependency supply chain, CI/CD pipeline security, LLM/AI security, skill supply chain scanning, plus OWASP Top 10, STRIDE threat modeling, and active verification. Two modes: daily (zero-noise, 8/10 confidence gate) and comprehensive (monthly deep scan, 2/10 bar). Trend tracking across audit runs. Use when: "security audit", "threat model", "pentest review", "OWASP", "CSO review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spec-Driven Development workflow — enforces sdd/ folder hierarchy with planning-first gates, current-state artifacts, and completion verification
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Aggregate parallel agent results into concise output
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Safety constraints and quality gates for pipeline and workflow execution
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disciplined goal-to-execution workflow for any user task. Parses objective, asks only for materially missing requirements via ambiguity-gate, inspects repo via idea, plans via sdd-dev or deep-plan, executes safely under project conventions, verifies completion per R020, and reports changed files with evidence. Use when user invokes /goal <task>.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-routing ambiguity analysis — scores request clarity and asks clarifying questions when needed (inspired by ouroboros)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
On explicit /homework invocation, analyze the current and linked previous sessions, extract mistakes (찐빠), and report them via omcustom-feedback with a confirmation gate. Auto-activation on session cleanup/session-end signals is OPT-IN (default OFF) — requires an explicit project/user directive. Use when explicitly auditing recent work for harness gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare a traceable local Fusion engineering review draft with source identities, artifacts and unresolved assurance gates. Not for sending, publication or release approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。