5,128 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Perform comprehensive audit of interface quality across accessibility, performance, theming, and responsive design. Generates detailed report of issues with severity ratings and recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JeecgBoot Online表单（cgform）全生命周期管理——通过API自动创建/编辑数据库表和表单配置， 支持单表、主子表、树表，26种控件类型，以及JS/Java/SQL增强、权限配置、数据CRUD、积木报表集成。 只要用户意图涉及「Online表单」就必须使用本技能，包括但不限于： 创建或配置数据库表（"建一张请假表"、"创建online表"、"做一个带下拉选择的表"、"低代码表单"、"在线表单"、"配置表"）、 修改已有Online表字段（"加个字段"、"改字段类型"、"加子表"、"删除字段"）、 配置表单增强（"JS增强"、"自定义按钮"、"表单联动"、"Java增强"、"SQL增强"）、 配置权限（"字段权限"、"按钮权限"、"数据权限"、"授权给角色"）、 管理表单数据（"插入数据"、"查询记录"、"导出CSV"、"造测试数据"）、 以及关联积木报表（"给这个表加报表"、"集成打印"）。 即使用户只描述了业务需求而没说"online"（如"做一个员工信息管理功能，包含姓名、部门下拉、入职日期"）， 只要涉及元数据驱动的表单配置，也应触发本技能。 注意：不要与「设计器表单」(desform)混淆——desform是拖拽式表单设计器，用skill jeecg-desform处理； 也不要与「Online报表」(cgreport)或「Online图表」(onlchart)混淆——它们是SQL驱动的只读展示。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the Crabbox wrapper for OpenClaw remote validation across Linux, macOS, Windows, and WSL2, including delegated Blacksmith Testbox proof. Report the actual provider and id.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage TestFlight crashes, beta feedback, and performance diagnostics using asc. Use when the user asks about TF crashes, TestFlight crash reports, beta tester feedback, app hangs, disk writes, launch diagnostics, or wants a crash summary for a build or app.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants a paper audited for integrity issues — image misuse, numerical anomalies, logical gaps — and needs a reviewable evidence report. Works on external papers (PDF / DOI / arXiv) and on outputs from a local paper-writer run. Single-stage skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user has a research question and needs a complete experiment package — design document, runnable code, results (measured or simulated with honest provenance), publication-grade figures, structured report. Single-stage, no Python runtime.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/PRD asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the Crabbox wrapper for OpenClaw remote validation across Linux, macOS, Windows, and WSL2, including delegated Blacksmith Testbox proof. Report the actual provider and id.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate an alert or incident in this channel: classify the symptom, load the matching triage reference, check lessons.md for known causes, and post a grounded first-pass diagnosis with evidence links and a proposed (never executed) fix. Use when an alert fires, a routine detects a new anomaly, or someone reports something broken ("tests aren't running", "deploys look stuck", "is CI down?").
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for test coverage with Bun, --coverage flag, lcov reports, thresholds, and CI integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when user asks for Claude Code usage stats, weekly analytics, project activity summary, or wants to see what projects were worked on. Triggers on "аналитика", "статистика claude", "cc stats", "weekly report", "что делал"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits the agent rules in the current folder (AGENTS.md, nested AGENTS.md files) and the skill descriptions the agent sees at start, then reports what to cut, move or rewrite and edits only after the user says yes. Use on «аудит правил», «проверь AGENTS.md», «почему агент не слушается правил», «проверь скиллы».
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage a GitHub issue using diagnostics archives and logs. Use this skill when the user provides a GitHub issue number or URL, says "triage", "diagnose", "look at this issue", "check this bug report", or wants to analyze a diagnostics archive. Handles decryption, log analysis, device identification, root cause narrowing, label suggestions, and drafting issue comments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Edits, redlines, and comments on Word .docx files in place, keeping their formatting — prefer it over unzipping and hand-editing the XML. Use for tracked changes (redline, accept/reject), comments (add/reply/resolve), filling contracts/NDAs/forms, restyling headings/fonts, margins/page setup, tables, headers/footers/page numbers, footnotes, or reading a .docx as Markdown. Also builds new Word docs and reports from Markdown or code. Not for PDF, Excel, PowerPoint, Google Docs, or .doc.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the weak-agent adversarial test harness against docx-cli. Spawns weak exercise agents (Haiku by default, Sonnet to probe, or a local agent harness's pre-produced runs) to perform real document tasks over six scenarios — five editing (MNDA form-fill + font fidelity, invoice table-edit/restructure + logo replace, résumé styling, contract redlining + commenting, contract finalize via accept/reject + comment reply/resolve) and one authoring (T. S. Eliot poetry journal: multi-column, verse, footnotes, links, figure) — renders every result with Word, has opus judge them against ground-truth rubrics, measures each exercise's tool economy, token cost, wall-clock, and correctness (from transcripts for Claude, the exercise.json ledger for the local harness), and synthesizes a prioritized ergonomics report. Use when the user says 'adversarial review', 'test docx-cli with weak agents', 'run the haiku harness', 'weak agent test', or wants to re-run yesterday's adversarial process.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Judgment rules for user-facing text and docs: CLI and diagnostic output, error and help text, README and docs structure, code comments, titles, and generated reports, decks, or exports. Use when writing or changing any user-visible string, when adding or restructuring docs or deciding which page owns a fact, when a page is about to record a version, a deployment state, or a value the code already owns, when a comment, title, or artifact could carry the reasoning or an abandoned option behind the change, when a behavior change needs its copy sites swept, or when reviewing a diff that touches copy or docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a cumulative daily or retrospective sweep of research papers on a chosen topic, audit their claims, methods, integrity signals, and independent support, then identify overlooked but feasible project or business opportunities in a detailed source-grounded report. Use when asked to monitor papers every day, mine buried research, evaluate whether a paper is credible or reproducible, find unimplemented research ideas, or separate promising work from hype, weak evidence, and retracted or contradicted results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze contracts for risks, obligations, key clauses, and generate structured risk reports with severity ratings. Use when the user requests contract review or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit web interfaces against WCAG 2.1 AA/AAA standards, identify violations, and produce actionable remediation reports with code fixes. Use when the user requests accessibility testing or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages software projects end-to-end — decomposing work into tasks, tracking progress across sprints, generating status reports, and integrating with tools like Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues, and Trello. Use when the user requests project management or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct in-depth, multi-step research on a given topic by decomposing queries, finding diverse sources, cross-referencing findings, and synthesizing a comprehensive report. Use when the user requests deep research or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate, execute, and analyze tests for codebases, covering unit, integration, and end-to-end testing with coverage reporting. Use when the user requests testing or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze NPS, CSAT, and qualitative customer feedback to extract themes, identify trends, and generate actionable insight reports. Use when the user requests customer feedback analysis or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a skill's evals and report results. Use when the user wants to evaluate a skill, run evals, benchmark a skill, validate triggers, optimize a description, or grade skill outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。