「search skill」の検索結果

Sync suite skill installation instructions with upstream sources and ensure Gaia-compliant styling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dry-run Trust Magnitude for proposed named skills or suites before curation. Use when deciding whether a proposed suite deserves A/S treatment, when checking Fusion Score structural inputs, when comparing repo stars vs suite component counts, or when asked to appraise a candidate before adding it to the registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gaia Skill Tree image-generation and deterministic export harness for Ascension Overdrive v3. Use when generating, iterating, refining, cropping, color-grading, making transparent cutouts, compressing, upscaling, or validating production image assets. Always use image gen 2 / gpt-image-2 and never nano-banana.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Founder orchestrator persona for Marcus Tiongson's gaia-skill-tree sessions. Activates the planner-and-delegator role defined in founder/ORCHESTRATOR.md — thinking partner, session steward, subagent spawner. Use at the start of any founder-mode work session on this repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Atomically ingest one already-verified evidence row into one named Gaia skill using the CLI, then appraise Trust Magnitude and propose—never silently apply—a calibration. Use after /ev-pipeline has verified an approved intake source, or whenever a curator says "ingest evidence", "add verified evidence", "gaia-ingest", or "turn this source into registry evidence".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close out a completed EPIC / sprint end-to-end: author a fact-verified meta-post announcing what shipped, archive the EPIC's handovers, snapshot orchestrator memory, gate the integration→main merge on CI-green + explicit human go, drive the version bump (merge-commit conventions that auto-sync classifies), and verify the release reached the registry/PyPI. Use when the user says "close out EPIC <n>", "wrap up the sprint", "ship the meta shift", "/epic-close", or asks to finalize an integration branch that is ready to merge to main. Generalizes the EPIC 1002 (Yggdrasil II) close-out. This skill orchestrates — it authors founder docs directly (superadmin) and delegates code/regen to workers; it NEVER merges to main without the human gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 2 of the evidence verification pipeline. Validates GitHub star counts in registry skill files against live GitHub API data and flags stale or inflated metrics without repartitioning evidence by rank. Use this after /ev-collection has compiled the unified data lake and before /ev-adversarial-audit begins. Trigger phrases: "verify stars", "check star counts", "refresh stargazer metrics", "run star verification", "ev-star-verification", "Phase 2", "live star check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 4 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Checks every URL in the evidence data lake for HTTP liveness — catches dead links (404, 403, timeout, connection errors) before evidence is ingested into the registry. Use this skill when running the full /ev-pipeline, asked to "validate links", "check evidence URLs", "run link validation", "find dead links in the data lake", "check HTTP status of evidence sources", or "verify evidence links still work". Wraps validate_sources.py as a temporary coexistence URL-health shim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovery-only Gaia curation for one manually selected source page. Fetches and normalizes up to five real SKILL.md candidates, deduplicates and maps them for human L4 review, then stops without evidence scoring or registry mutation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovery-only global trending extension for Gaia. Snapshots configured external skill sources, prioritizes five-candidate pages for L4 review, and stops before trust, evidence, intake, or registry mutation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Batch wrapper for /gaia-ingest. Ingests a bounded set of already-verified evidence rows through CLI-only writes, uses --no-build on every row, appraises Trust Magnitude for every affected named skill, then runs exactly one build and validation pass. Use for an L4-approved intake after /ev-pipeline; benchmark-result rows also require a Phase 2B report and explicit human gate approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canonical entry point for the full Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Invoke as /evidence-verification-pipeline or /ev-pipeline — both names trigger this skill. Use whenever you need to run the evidence phases end-to-end: collecting raw evidence from the data lake, verifying live GitHub star counts, running Phase 2B benchmark-source verification, running adversarial auditing for noise and URL errors, and checking link health via Firecrawl. Also use when someone says "run the evidence pipeline", "verify the evidence lake", "audit evidence", "run ev-pipeline", "full evidence check", "pipeline run", "prepare evidence for ingestion", or "refresh the data lake". This is the pre-ingestion step — run it before importing any evidence into the registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search documentation effectively for agents: index docs, query precisely, and cite sources. Use when agents need accurate answers from documentation rather than guesses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elasticsearch guidance — index design, mappings, query DSL, aggregations, cluster operations, and performance tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research libraries and APIs automatically by pulling live documentation into the agent's context before answering. Use when writing code against unfamiliar or fast-moving libraries so examples match current versions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why, AI policy for the marketing team, AI governance, AI acceptable use policy, which AI tools are we allowed to use, can I paste customer data into ChatGPT, shadow AI, AI use register, human review of AI output, when can we stop reviewing every AI draft, can the agent send on its own, the AI made a mistake now what, pull back AI autonomy, AI evals, our AI vendor changed the model, AI output went out wrong, prompt injection, can our AI read prospect replies safely, lethal trifecta, the AI leaked internal notes, turn off auto-generated ad assets, auto-applied recommendations, AI literacy training, EU AI Act Article 4, duplicate records in the CRM, dedupe before import, which value wins in a merge, CRM cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

使用 ve docs search/fetch 检索火山引擎官方文档并获取全文。Use when 用户咨询火山引擎产品的概念、用法、计费规则、部署步骤、最佳实践或服务条款，或提供 www.volcengine.com/docs/、docs.volcengine.com/docs/ 链接需要阅读正文时。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage Volcengine cloud resources using the Volcengine CLI (`ve` command). Supports all Volcengine services including ECS, VPC, CLB, RDS, Redis, and more. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks to create, query, modify, or delete cloud resources on Volcengine, mentions the `ve` command, says "volcengine CLI", or describes infrastructure tasks such as "create an ECS instance", "set up a VPC", "list security groups", "allocate an EIP". Also trigger on Chinese prompts mentioning "火山引擎" or "火山" (e.g., "火山引擎上有哪些 ECS"、"查一下我火山的云服务器"、 "火山引擎创建一个 VPC"、"火山的 Redis 实例列一下"). Also trigger when the user encounters errors from `ve` commands and needs troubleshooting help. Also use for TOS bucket/object operations, tosutil (sometimes written tosutils), Ark CLI / arkcli model discovery, inference, generation, endpoints, fine-tuning, plans, or usage, and TLS (日志服务) / volclog log search, analysis, ingest, export, or LogCollector collection, through `ve tosutil`, `ve arkcli` and `ve volclog`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

N-round adversarial review pipeline for empirical research output — the chain from data to LaTeX tables to a manuscript that cites them. A Claude drafter proposes minimal diffs, a deterministic mechanical battery gates every diff from a clean state with a regression gate, a Codex reviewer files check-backed critiques, and a blind judge panel decides residual disputes. Manual-invoke ONLY: trigger when the user explicitly runs /adversarial-empirical-review or names 'adversarial-empirical-review' / 'adversarial empirical review'. Do NOT auto-trigger on generic 'review my results', 'check my tables', or manuscript-editing requests. For prose-style refinement use style-emulation instead; this skill AUDITS WHETHER THE TABLES ARE CORRECT — that each number in the tables is what the analysis code computes, reproduces from the data, and is internally consistent. It is an empirical + code review: the manuscript is read only to resolve table numbering, and prose is not examined.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user wants to do anything with PDF files. This includes reading or extracting text/tables from PDFs, combining or merging multiple PDFs into one, splitting PDFs apart, rotating pages, adding watermarks, creating new PDFs, filling PDF forms, encrypting/decrypting PDFs, extracting images, and OCR on scanned PDFs to make them searchable. If the user mentions a .pdf file or asks to produce one, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update user personas from new feedback, pilot data, or research. Use this skill when: - New pilot data or feedback reveals changed user behaviors or pain points - Annual persona review is due (1-2x per year) - New user segments are discovered that need persona documentation - Existing personas need validation against recent data

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate user research interview scripts using Mom Test principles. Use this skill when: - You are preparing for user interviews or pilot observation sessions - You need a question bank organized by behavior, context, pain points, and workflow - You want interview guides that avoid leading questions and hypotheticals - You need per-persona interview guides - You are preparing for field visits or pilot debriefs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show a Google Search Console performance dashboard for the last 28 days. Displays total clicks, impressions, CTR, and average position, plus top 25 queries and top 25 pages. Use when user says "GSC overview", "search console performance", "how is my site doing in Google", "clicks and impressions", or "show me my GSC data".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze branded vs non-branded traffic split using Google Search Console data. Shows what percentage of organic clicks come from brand name searches vs generic queries. Requires user to confirm brand terms before analysis. Use when user says "brand vs nonbrand", "branded traffic", "brand queries", "non-brand traffic", or "branded vs generic".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。