「how」の検索結果

This skill should be used when the user asks to create custom Remotion transitions, asks about "cool transitions", "cinematic transitions", "striped transitions", "glitch transitions", "custom TransitionPresentation", or wants to build scene-to-scene transitions in Remotion beyond the built-in library. Also triggers for "how to make transitions in Remotion", "custom transition", "high-energy transitions", "energy transitions", "branded transitions".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Purpose: Standardize how stakpak designs and optimizes AWS architectures. Scope: Greenfield: design new infrastructure. Brownfield: analyze existing architectures and propose improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when independently assessing how bounded Python code could accomplish the same behavior with less maintained code, more Pythonic design, newer language/stdlib capabilities, or well-maintained ecosystem libraries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan Claude Code session transcripts to find the strongest user reactions to assistant instruction-following failures, reconstruct the triggering assistant output, and render a shareable terminal-style PNG artifact. Use when you want to surface and share a moment where the assistant completely missed what was asked — captures what they were doing, what Claude said, and how the user reacted. Triggers on: "rtfp", "read the fucking prompt", "find my worst AI moment", "make a rage screenshot from this session".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and improve processes or systems using an explicit semantic model, adaptive instruction resolution, evidence-driven change, and claim-level validation. Use when reviewing process quality, resolving ambiguity or gaps, deciding how much procedural detail is necessary, or validating consequential process behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs the description-drift experiment — spawns all Claude Code agents simultaneously to collect self-reported capabilities, then compares them against static frontmatter descriptions to reveal how reliable orchestrator routing based on descriptions actually is. Use when measuring description drift across the agent fleet, re-running the capability collection experiment, analyzing a specific agent's self-reported capabilities, or auditing whether frontmatter descriptions accurately reflect agent behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Where a dispatched step puts its output, and how it signals state upstream.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when assigning backlog items to a GitHub milestone. Args: {milestone-number} [P0|P1|P2|title-filter]. Uses backlog list to load items, shows items with GitHub Issue status, lets user select which to assign. Creates missing GitHub Issues for selected P0/P1 items, assigns all to the milestone, updates Project V2 Status to Backlog. Use after create-milestone to populate a sprint or release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting a new feature, gathering requirements for an unfamiliar domain, refining a vague idea into actionable scope, or when a user request is ambiguous or underspecified. Conducts SAM Stage 1 discovery — structured requirements gathering through user discussion, asking WHO/WHAT/WHEN/WHY and never HOW. Produces the ARTIFACT:DISCOVERY document containing feature requirements, NFRs, goals, anti-goals, references, and resolved questions. Supports backlog item self-initialization via a

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to determine which backlog backend a project is configured to use, and what to do with the answer. Use when about to call a backend-specific tool, choosing between a GitHub-only and a Beads-native operation, or reporting which store a result came from.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test harness for Claude Code skill argument substitution — demonstrates capture-block pre-declaration, XML tag referencing, unintentional variable corruption in code blocks, and correct placement of shell examples in reference files. Use when verifying substitution behavior before applying a pattern to other skills, testing how arguments flow from skill invocations, or understanding the pre-declaration and reference file pattern with greet/farewell/inspect actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install, check or upgrade the papercut toolchain. Runs the doctor, asks how much to set up (Minimal, Standard, Full), then runs install.sh with flags and fixes dependency errors. Use for "set up papercut-explainer", "install papercut", "check my papercut install", "set up the voice", "why won't it render".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or fix the hook of a papercut reel. Produces the SAY / WRITE / SHOW / ALIGN block, five variants scored with the hook check, the frame-0 cover title and the motion out of the hook. Use for "write a hook for...", or when a reel's first three seconds lose people.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide what a papercut reel should be. Picks the topic, one familiar format, the audience level, the comment-keyword funnel and caption, studies competitor reels, and runs the post-publish autopsy. Use before any hook or script, or when reviewing how a posted reel did.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns raw captures (dictated braindumps in a deliverable's inbox/, or recent macwhspr dictation-log entries) into proposed planning-wiki changes, shown as one unified diff. Classifies each statement as a decision, evidence claim, question, task, or dropped item, traces it to its capture paragraph, tags unconfirmed names, numbers, and citations UNRESOLVED, and writes decisions only with the author's assent. Edits only the planning wiki, never source files. Use when asked to intake, absorb notes, or process the inbox, or after dictating notes from a talk, meeting, or reading session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs several language models as independent coders on one labeling or discovery task and treats disagreement as data. Covers diverse panel assembly, independent voting, consensus rules, Cohen’s and Fleiss kappa, Krippendorff’s alpha, correlated-error limits on validity claims, human validation, and reporting. Use when the user asks about a council, panel, ensemble, or jury of models, how to combine model labels, or what kappa or alpha to report for model coders. Single-model codebook and validation work goes to text-classification, per-item confidence to llm-calibration-logprobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs several language models as independent coders on the same labeling or discovery task and reads their disagreement as data — panel assembly for model diversity, keeping votes independent, consensus rules, agreement statistics (Cohen's and Fleiss kappa, Krippendorff's alpha), the correlated-errors caveat that stops agreement being mistaken for validity, human validation beyond the panel, and reporting. Use when the user asks about a council, panel, ensemble, or jury of models, asks how to combine several models' labels, or asks what kappa or alpha to report for model coders. Single-model codebook and validation work goes to text-classification, per-item confidence to llm-calibration-logprobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds or audits a literature review, producing an evidence map, the closest prior work, source clusters, a gap verdict, and a synthesis plan for the introduction. Use when the user asks whether a contribution is novel, who has studied a question, what the literature establishes, or how to organize a review, or wants a reading list, Zotero export, or pile of papers turned into one. For systematic reviews or meta-analyses it produces the protocol scaffold and routes registration (PROSPERO or OSF) and screening to dedicated tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advises on setting up and validating topic models for survey and experimental text. Covers the discovery-versus-measurement question, choosing STM, LDA, or BERTopic, preprocessing consequences, prevalence and content formulas, topic-count selection across coherence, exclusivity and FREX, held-out likelihood, and residuals, validation of topics against human judgment, robustness, and DA-RT-compliant reporting. Use when the user has open-ended responses or another corpus and asks what topics are present, how many topics to use, about STM, searchK, coherence, or FREX, or wants topic prevalence compared across treatment arms or countries. Fixed-codebook coding goes to text-classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a theory into falsifiable, pre-registerable hypotheses, covering the DGP and DAG, identification, SATE versus PATE, counterfactual and directional framing, named estimands, justified SESOIs, the choice among NHST, equivalence, interval, and minimum-effect tests, scope conditions, and primary, secondary, and exploratory tiers. Use when the user asks to turn a research question or theory into hypotheses, whether a prediction is falsifiable, what the estimand is, or how to predict a null. Framing goes to narrative-building, the plan to pre-registration-writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-evolution workflow for the agent. Before substantive work, recall past outcomes from evolution memory; while editing, detect improvement signals; at task end, record the outcome; when reusable, distill or search the EvoMap network for proven genes/capsules. Use when the user starts non-trivial work (a feature, a fix, a refactor) or asks the agent to "evolve", "learn from this", or "remember how this went".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose which SkillNote skill collection is active for this project. Use when user says "change collection", "switch skills", "use frontend skills", "show collections", or at first session in a new project when recommended.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose which SkillNote skill collection is active for this Codex project. Use when the user says "change collection", "switch skills", "use frontend skills", or "show collections".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to use Figma MCP and Variables2CSS to read designs from Figma and generate code consistent with tokens. Use when the designer shares a Figma link.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。