design
無料Use when starting UI work, defining palettes or tokens, fixing AI-generic UI, or persisting a design system to DESIGN.md (modes: implement, persist). Not for live URLs: use web-design-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
4,557 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when starting UI work, defining palettes or tokens, fixing AI-generic UI, or persisting a design system to DESIGN.md (modes: implement, persist). Not for live URLs: use web-design-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user runs /web-design-review with a URL to visually audit and fix a live UI. Not for design direction: use design. Not for variant galleries: use design-variants.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a rendering path needs stable frame-time, CPU, GPU, and memory evidence against fixed targets. Not for one-shot profiling or visual quality review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to audit typography across a codebase. Produces a file:line report with concrete fixes ordered by impact and flags unverifiable rules. Not for building a type system or token scale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when work is about to grow past the ask, the task may already be done, or the user requests only the minimum. Not for executing the work: use tdd to build or strike-the-root to fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a human explicitly asks for a full repository agent-compatibility pass returning a scored report with prioritized fixes. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to run /xcode-simulator-testing with a scheme name or current to build and launch an iOS app in a simulator. Not for project regeneration: use ios-build-fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an exact symbol, path, entrypoint, or line range can bound a focused code question or patch proposal under a fixed source budget. Not for source changes or broad repository exploration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user wants agent setup graded from conversation history. Not for skill fixing: use agent-surface-forge. Not for security scanning: use skill-scanner.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when code mixes units, fixed-point precisions, scaling factors, rates, prices, shares, or conversions. Not for type-level unit modeling: use type-driven.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants a clean Xcode rebuild by deleting DerivedData and build artifacts. Do not use for diagnosing a specific build error: use ios-build-fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a bug, failure, flake, regression, review finding, or ticket needs the core fixed so it cannot recur. Not for greenfield features: use tdd. Not for style-only review or typo-class one-liners.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create or revise a governed Proto UI spec entity after identity, ownership, lifecycle intent, semantic scope, relations, and evidence plan are fixed by current authority. Use for Contract, Prototype, Module, Adapter profile, Decision, Host Capability, Test, Version, or Knowledge entity work. Do not use to decide an unresolved admission or lifecycle promotion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route ordinary Proto UI development through a minimal composition of repository skills. Use when starting, continuing, or handing off feature, fix, spec, contract, Module, Host Capability, Adapter, Prototype, component, test, documentation, review, or release-preparation work. Do not use for autonomous-maintenance runs; use pui-maintain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply one governed bounded Proto UI dependency update after pui-deps establishes the exact manifest, lockfile, consumers, compatibility evidence, and rollback boundary. Use for ordinary package or toolchain updates whose intended compatibility is already fixed. Route unresolved public compatibility, security disclosure, publication, release, or provenance exceptions to their dedicated decision path.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement or revise one governed Proto UI Host Capability connecting a semantic Module to a bounded host responsibility. Use when capability identity, portable need, public shape, availability, failure, replacement, cleanup, fidelity, Adapter realization, and evidence are fixed by current authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repair one independently verified Proto UI maintenance finding when governing authority or an explicit product decision fixes the expected result. Use for the bounded remediation and its evidence packet before independent review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement one governed Proto UI Adapter-profile realization slice. Use when target and runtime range, supported or omitted Module role, Host Capability fidelity, lifecycle translation, failure behavior, compatibility boundary, and evidence scope are fixed by current authority. Use pui-adapter-assess for research or readiness assessment and pui-regression first for a governed failing behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reproduce and repair a bounded Proto UI regression whose expected behavior and owning layer are already governed. Use this before domain implementation skills whenever work starts from a reproducible failure, including bug fixes, drift repairs, broken exports, Runtime failures, Adapter parity defects, Prototype defects, or public-projection regressions. Do not use when expected semantics or ownership is unresolved.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement or extend one governed Proto UI Module semantic slice. Use when Module ownership, facade and port boundary, dependencies, resource lifetime, Host Capability plan, Runtime registration, Adapter evidence, and validation scope are fixed by current authority. Do not use to admit a new Module or decide ownership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine an existing implementation plan with a second iteration. Re-analyzes the codebase for gaps, missing tasks, and wrong dependencies. Use after $aif-plan or to improve an $aif-fix plan. Optional +check flag validates refinements via a fresh-context subagent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix RFDB V2 graph data silently not persisting to disk after analysis. Use when: (1) rfdb-server reports "0 nodes, 0 edges" on restart despite successful analysis, (2) segment directories exist but are empty (no .bin files), (3) manifest_index.json shows total_nodes: 0 despite analysis logging 70k+ nodes, (4) Docker builds produce empty graph databases, (5) --clear flag used before analyze command. Root cause: GraphEngineV2::clear() replaces the store with MultiShardStore::ephemeral() which has path: None, causing all flush operations to write to in-memory buffers only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix Playwright automation failures against code-server (VS Code in browser). Use when: (1) trust dialog blocks all clicks — "monaco-dialog-modal-block intercepts pointer events", (2) button:has-text() finds wrong buttons behind modal dialog, (3) keyboard shortcuts don't work — Meta vs Control inconsistency, (4) VS Code extension activity bar icon not found by aria-label, (5) panels show placeholder text despite extension being "Connected". Covers trust dialog dismissal, keyboard shortcut hybrid mode, extension panel selectors, and database connection verification for Grafema extension.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix missing theorem proof terms when analyzing Lean 4 environments via importModules. Use when: (1) ConstantInfo.value? returns none for theorems despite TheoremVal.value being Expr, (2) building code graph / dependency extractor for Lean 4 and getting 0 proof dependency edges, (3) Lean 4.30+ project where theorem proofs appear missing from loaded environment, (4) analyzing Mathlib or any Lean 4 project and proof terms are empty. Root cause: breaking change in Lean 4.30 — value? treats theorems as opaque by default.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。