「context」の検索結果

Audit and safely clean local project repositories or workspaces with excessive generated files, old project residue, dirty Git status, stale worktrees, build caches, duplicate nested projects, confusing roots, or agent context/token waste. Use when the user asks to organize a repo, remove useless files, classify valid project files, clean untracked/deleted files, reduce disk usage, migrate from an old repo layout to a canonical project, or prepare a repository for future Codex/agent work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route ordinary public-web information tasks to the correct Tavily CLI operation. Use when the task concerns publicly accessible webpages and needs web discovery, clean extraction, URL mapping, same-site crawling, or public-web-only research, but the exact Tavily operation is not yet clear or several operations must be sequenced. Prefer the specific leaf skill when intent is clear: tavily-search for discovery without a URL, tavily-extract for known URLs, tavily-map for URL/site-structure discovery, tavily-crawl for content from many pages on one site, tavily-research for cited multi-source synthesis, and tavily-dynamic-search for programmatic filtering with context isolation. Do not use for named social/community/media/career/code platforms, login or cookie-dependent content, platform-native discussions, or cross-platform collection; use Agent Reach there. Do not use for local files, Git operations, deployments, or ordinary code editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when discussing codebase terminology, writing or editing a CONTEXT.md, or recording or editing an ADR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

仅在 `<coze-context>` 标识为"群聊消息"且任务涉及该群组协作时使用——浏览群消息历史、查询群成员、读写编辑群项目文件、协调群里的多方协作、把协作产出衔接给用户。触发场景: 用户问"上次说啥/这次结论是啥"、"谁在群里/有谁的权限"; 用户让你"看一下/改一下/沉淀到"群文件; 用户让你基于群历史/群文件做产出。在"单聊消息"或与该群协作无关的一般性问答下不要使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prioritize vulnerability remediation using KEV-style exploitation context plus asset criticality. Use for CVE triage, patch order decisions, and remediation reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when [trigger symptoms, user intents, task contexts]. Include Chinese trigger phrases when useful. Do not summarize workflow here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semantic audit of the IDD instruction corpus for leaked session context, cross-file contradictions, fresh-memory completability gaps, automation blockers, and restatement-discipline drift. Use on request to audit .github/instructions, the issue-authoring skill bundle, and the installed agent entry files (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md). Read-only — never edits files or mutates issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and optimize a skill system with evidence. Use for skill architecture, token or context waste, role and prompt boundaries, routing hits or misfires, plugin packaging, registry/docs/source drift, duplicate workflows, or deciding whether a reusable change belongs in a skill. Runs deterministic checks first and applies only authorized, minimal fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

INTERNAL sub-agent, not a user-facing skill. Performs context-isolated nine-dimension rubric scoring for cheat-score, cheat-predict, and cheat-bump. Accepts only script and rubric-note paths, returns strict JSON, and refuses post-publish evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain and update the persistent project chronicle (docs/chronicle.md). Trigger when: - The human requests a history summary or chronicle update. - Starting work on a new codebase and needing context on its evolution. - Prompt contains keywords: /chronicle, chronicle, project history, git log summary, history summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to MEASURE this repo instead of eyeballing it — interpret the loop-station context-budget trend (history.jsonl, thresholds, the tokenizer-switch gotcha), read a session trace, use the eval ledger (cost-per-success), and pick the right evidence tool (app-shots, smoke-deployed, db-counts, --check modes). Use when asked "is the harness bloating", "how big is CLAUDE.md really", "did this agent run actually succeed", "prove this works", "what evidence do we have", or when tempted to declare a capability (browser, tool) unavailable. For RUNNING the loop-station scripts, defer to the loop-station skill — this skill is interpretation + the wider evidence toolkit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatic quality check on significant outputs via isolated sub-agent. Spawns reflection-agent for objective evaluation without conversation context bias.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating personalized practice challenges calibrated to the learner's weak areas, level, and project context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate all JSON-LD scripts in Astro pages — check parsability, @context, @type, and Layout.astro auto-inject compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working in a repository that uses bd or Beads for durable project task tracking, issue dependencies, blocker management, multi-session handoff, or shared work memory. Trigger when the user asks to find ready work, claim or close tasks, create follow-up work, inspect blockers, recover project context, or choose between local planning and persistent project tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

タスク文脈に応じた設計書章番号を調べるとき、動的ロードするべき章を特定するときに読む。

VRIO resource analysis combined with Dynamic Capabilities assessment. Use this skill to identify real competitive advantages (Barney VRIO framework), then test whether the organisation can sense new opportunities, seize them, and transform itself to stay ahead (Teece dynamic capabilities). Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep first-use sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for defining early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about competitive advantage, defensibility, resource assessment, why competitors are gaining ground, organisational agility, or whether advantages will hold. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

First-principles strategy — strip away conventional assumptions and find the theoretical maximum for your business. Three modes. Diagnostic mode runs a full session (45+ min) to define your theoretical maximum, map the gap honestly, classify constraints, invert for failure modes, set strategic intent, and work backwards to your first intervention. Review mode (15-20 min) checks whether your theoretical maximum has shifted, whether the gap has changed, and whether you're still climbing the right peak. Alert mode defines constraint-shift, peak-shift, and local-peak triggers that tell you when to reassess. Use when someone is stuck optimising incrementally, when conventional wisdom is driving strategy, when a new technology or regulation changes what's physically possible, or when you suspect the business is climbing a local peak. Integrates with company-context.md. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategy map analysis using the Eterdis two-directional causal chain. Use this skill to diagnose whether strategy is coherent by building two chains — bottom-up from resources to results, top-down from expectations to requirements — and finding where they don't connect. Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about strategic alignment, why the strategy isn't working, what to invest in, how the business creates value, whether the plan is realistic, or where the biggest gap is. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track Two / internal innovation system for running small, fast experiments outside the core business. Runs in three modes — Diagnostic for designing the full Protoloop from scratch (intake channels, loop structure, team, exit paths), Review for running the monthly heartbeat meeting (loop-by-loop decisions, forward-loading, portfolio health), and Alert Triggers for defining tripwires that protect, feed, and maintain momentum in the system. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about innovation pipelines, intrapreneurship, Track Two strategy, experimentation systems, handling ideas that don't fit the core business, or building systematic exploration alongside exploitation. Based on 20 years of practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Culture assessment and monitoring with three modes — Diagnostic for a deep session surfacing the gap between declared culture and actual culture, Review for periodic check-ins on whether behavior is shifting, and Alert Triggers for setting tripwires around culture-strategy misalignment, regression, and integration risk. Not a culture change programme — a mirror. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about culture, values, team dynamics, how decisions really get made, why change efforts stall, merger integration, or whether the organisation can actually execute its strategy. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategy cascade based on Roger Martin and A.G. Lafley's Playing to Win framework. Five interconnected choices that define a real strategy — not a vision statement, not a list of priorities, not a strategic plan that's really just a budget with adjectives. Runs in three modes — Diagnostic for building or rebuilding the full cascade, Review for pressure-testing an existing one, and Alert Triggers for defining the tripwires that tell you the cascade is breaking. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about strategy, strategic choices, winning aspiration, where to play, how to win, competitive strategy, or when someone says "we need a strategy" and means it. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before build, fix, debug, review, or docs implementation; converts prompts into structured intent JSON with goal, constraints, and routing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for role-scoped FE/BE/DevOps/Admin/QA project docs under .codex/project-docs to preserve micro-context across long projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。