「find」の検索結果

Research products across the web with Firecrawl and produce a shopping recommendation or cart-ready summary. Use when the user wants to compare products, find the best option, evaluate reviews, respect budget/preferences, or shop with a saved browser session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safe refactoring workflow using trace-mcp — assess risk, find candidates, check impact, and rename symbols across all files without missing import sites or cross-file references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to validate, lint, or audit agent skill files (SKILL.md). Use when they say "validate these skills," "check this repo's skills," "lint SKILL.md files," or "audit skills in [repo URL]." Run skill-check locally or against a cloned GitHub repo and summarize findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs a professional marketer's operating mindset for any marketing, growth, or client-acquisition task — finding first customers, writing an ad or landing page, designing ad creatives and visuals (how the eye works: background, scene, hero, movement), evaluating an idea, deciding whether to do X to get Y, positioning or launching a B2B or SaaS product, running cold outreach, setting up ads, or writing copy — not a tactical template.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a huge chunk of work (more than one agent session can hold) as a shared map of decision tickets on your issue tracker, and resolve them one at a time until the way to the destination is clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and execute structured exploratory testing sessions. Covers Session-Based Test Management (SBTM), charter writing, heuristic-based exploration (HICCUPS, FEW HICCUPS), bug discovery patterns, note-taking templates, and conversion of findings to automated tests. Use when: "exploratory testing," "SBTM," "manual testing," "bug hunting," "test charter," "heuristic testing." Not for: an AI browser agent autonomously exploring the app from a natural-language goal — use agentic-browser-testing. Not for: testing your product's own AI/LLM features — use ai-system-testing. Related: test-planning, ai-bug-triage, risk-based-testing, agentic-browser-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write effective unit tests with Jest, Vitest, or pytest. Covers the test-doubles taxonomy (stub/spy/mock/fake), Arrange-Act-Assert, coverage threshold configuration and CI gating, snapshot testing, fake timers, and mutation testing with Stryker/mutmut. Use when: "unit test," "Jest," "Vitest," "pytest," "mock," "coverage threshold," "test doubles," "mutation testing," "fake timers," "snapshot test." Not for: interpreting coverage reports or finding coverage gaps — use coverage-analysis; AI generating the test code for you — use ai-test-generation; auditing existing tests for smells — use ai-qa-review; browser/component rendering assertions — use cypress-automation or visual-testing. Related: coverage-analysis, ci-cd-integration, ai-test-generation, shift-left-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a whole regression suite and prune/restructure it with evidence: per-test coverage fingerprinting, AST near-duplicate clustering, CI-history mining for never-failing and flaky tests, prune decision rules (redundant/obsolete/low-value/keep), smoke/core/extended tiering by risk and defect-detection history, and a defensible "what we deleted and why" record. Deletion is destructive — quarantine and human sign-off are mandatory. Use when: "audit the test suite," "prune redundant tests," "find duplicate tests," "which tests can we delete," "restructure into smoke/core/extended," "is this test pulling its weight," "shrink the regression suite." Not for: Judging whether an individual test is WELL-WRITTEN (smells, assertions) — that is ai-qa-review. Healing one flaky test at runtime — that is test-reliability. Bulk selector regeneration after a UI refactor — that is selector-drift-recovery. Related: ai-qa-review, coverage-analysis, test-reliability, risk-based-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds and analyzes 5-10 comparable recent sales to estimate fair market value, calculate price adjustments, and score the property's value proposition

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews and adjusts PRD plans based on research findings. Use after completing research to evaluate story modifications. Triggers on: review plan, adjust stories, update prd based on research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess competitor defensibility and define our own moat strategy during PRD v0.3 Commercial Model. Triggers on requests to analyze competitor moats, define our defensibility, assess switching costs, identify vulnerabilities, find wedge opportunities, or when user asks "what's our moat?", "how defensible are they?", "where can we compete?", "switching costs?", "defensibility", "who to target". Consumes Competitive Landscape (v0.2) CFD- entries. Outputs CFD- entries for competitor moats and BR- entries for targeting rules and our defensibility strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the working-tree changes (vs main) for correctness, concurrency, architecture, testing, and API/doc issues — following .github/CODE_REVIEW.md — and return a severity-graded report. Scales the machinery to the diff size: a single code-reviewer agent for a small change, or a fan-out-and-verify Workflow for a large/multi-unit one. Produces findings; it does not apply fixes (the caller does).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially review the current implementation plan with three independent critic subagents, reconcile their findings into a consensus, and apply the agreed feedback to the plan. Use after drafting a plan (in plan mode or a plan/design doc) and before starting implementation, or whenever the user asks to pressure-test, critique, or harden a plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test any application — web apps, native macOS apps, Electron apps, CLI tools, interactive REPLs, or anything on screen. Three modes: browser (chromux/CDP, fast, DOM-level), computer (MCP computer-use, screenshot + pixel clicks, any app), and cli (tmux, send-keys + capture-pane for interactive terminals). Auto-selects mode or accepts --browser / --computer / --cli override. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "test this app", "find bugs", "test and fix", "fix what's broken", "dogfood", "exploratory test", "bug hunt", "QA this app", "사이트 테스트", "앱 테스트", "브라우저 QA", "화면 보고 테스트해줘", "네이티브 앱 테스트", "screen test". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain a body of work plainly so a person actually understands it. Runs the `how` and `why` skills and weaves what they find into one clear explanation. Use for 'teach me this', 'help me really understand X', 'explain this change or subsystem to me'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', or reviewing a small diff you don't trust.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spawn Comment Sicko, fix accepted findings, and offer encodings for claimed constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a Xiaohongshu niche and needs to find, compare, and extract reusable content structures from low-follower high-performing posts, or diagnose why a post did or did not become a breakout using click rate, retention, and interaction signals. Trigger phrases: "找对标", "低粉爆款", "拆爆款", "内容骨架", "点击率", "停留时长", "互动率", "competitor pattern", "viral post structure". Do not use before the monetization direction is clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic analysis of Google Ads and Meta advertising spend to identify wasted budget. Produces actionable exclusion lists with thematic categorization and statistical validation. Use when onboarding new accounts, performing monthly hygiene, or preparing for budget optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build detailed ideal customer profiles with pain points, objections, buying triggers, and messaging angles. Includes community research to find where ICPs gather online and extract their exact language. Use when researching audiences, creating buyer personas, or developing targeted messaging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured research briefs from RSS feeds and web sources on any topic. Synthesizes multiple sources into actionable analysis with key findings, data points, expert perspectives, and content angles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。