「report」の検索結果

Use AI to write NEW test code from specs, PRDs, user stories, code diffs, bug reports, or OpenAPI specs. Staged pipeline: requirements extraction → risk analysis → coverage matrix → scenario generation → oracle design → test code → human review, with guardrails against hallucinated APIs and weak assertions. Use when: "generate tests from spec," "tests from PRD," "tests from user story," "auto-generate test cases," "AI write tests for me." Not for: testing AI/LLM features in your product — use ai-system-testing. Not for: auditing a pre-existing test suite you did not just generate — use ai-qa-review (Step 7 here only reviews tests THIS pipeline produced). Related: playwright-automation, unit-testing, api-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write effective unit tests with Jest, Vitest, or pytest. Covers the test-doubles taxonomy (stub/spy/mock/fake), Arrange-Act-Assert, coverage threshold configuration and CI gating, snapshot testing, fake timers, and mutation testing with Stryker/mutmut. Use when: "unit test," "Jest," "Vitest," "pytest," "mock," "coverage threshold," "test doubles," "mutation testing," "fake timers," "snapshot test." Not for: interpreting coverage reports or finding coverage gaps — use coverage-analysis; AI generating the test code for you — use ai-test-generation; auditing existing tests for smells — use ai-qa-review; browser/component rendering assertions — use cypress-automation or visual-testing. Related: coverage-analysis, ci-cd-integration, ai-test-generation, shift-left-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or modify a konsistent.json configuration file that enforces structural conventions in a TypeScript codebase. Use when the user wants to enforce consistent code structure, validate exports/imports across files, ensure directories contain required files, enforce naming patterns, add/remove/update convention rules, configure case map overrides for acronyms or special casing (kebabToPascalMap, kebabToCamelMap), or troubleshoot why konsistent is reporting violations. Triggers on: "konsistent", "konsistent.json", "enforce conventions", "structural consistency", "consistent exports", "consistent structure", "code conventions config", "add convention", "update convention", "fix konsistent errors", "case map", "case override", "acronym casing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the konsistent CLI, review all reported violations, and fix them in the codebase. Use when the user wants to "fix konsistent violations", "resolve konsistent errors", "clean up konsistent diagnostics", "make konsistent pass", "address structural convention violations", or asks to run konsistent and act on the results. The skill is interactive: it requires explicit user decisions when many violations stem from the same rule (rule vs. code question), explicit user confirmation before modifying any code, and a triage step for non-trivial violations. For editing `konsistent.json`, this skill defers to the `konsistent-config` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convene a roundtable of sub-agents that debate a decision or proposal from opposing perspectives — parallel independent statements, anonymous cross-review, then a chaired verdict reporting consensus and dissent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a report — HTML on request — then grill through whichever one you pick.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mine a per-kernel optimization trace — a git repository capturing successive versions of one kernel being optimized — into structured, gate-validated optimization-experience records for the GPU kernel wiki. Use when asked to distill an optimization run, a kernel_opt trace directory or a version ladder into wiki records; to report what such a run actually achieved; to build, extend, re-run or validate the staging store behind those records; or to explain how a trace-derived record's number, snippet or provenance was established.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Seed a fresh (greenfield) repository with the PRD-Driven Context Engineering scaffold — PRD.md, SoT/ knowledge files, EPIC templates, domain-profile config, and agent MEMORY starters. Invoked as /prd-ce:init when the plugin is installed. The framework itself (skills, agents, hooks, scripts) ships LIVE in the plugin; this skill only plants the consumer-owned files the plugin cannot carry as behavior. Triggers on "/prd-ce:init", "set up PRD lifecycle here", "scaffold a new PRD-CE project", "initialize the methodology". Outputs a seeded scaffold + a verification report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install the PRD-Driven Context Engineering methodology into a fresh OR existing repository — the subscription-native alternative to forking the whole repo. Runs an interactive wizard that seeds the framework (.claude/ hooks, skills, agents, rules, scripts) without clobbering product content. Triggers on "install the methodology", "adopt this into my repo", "self-install", "set up PRD lifecycle here", "onboard existing project". Outputs an installed framework + a verification report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user wants to read, create, or edit Korean Hangul Word Processor documents (.hwp or .hwpx files). Triggers include any mention of 'hwp', 'hwpx', '한글 문서', '아래한글', '한컴오피스', or uploading/attaching .hwp/.hwpx files. Also use when extracting text from Korean reports or producing Korean-formatted official documents (공문, 보고서, 계약서, 사업계획서). Do NOT use for Word .docx files (use the docx skill instead) or general Korean text without Hangul Word Processor format. ⚠️ SECURITY: if the task fills a form with personal data (주민등록번호·계좌·연락처·주소 등), LOAD THIS SKILL FIRST — before any `ls`/`cat`/`Read`/`grep` of the working dir or home — and NEVER directly cat/Read/grep a profile or 내정보 file (e.g. ~/.claw-hwp/profile.txt), even "to check it". Its SECURE FILL flow reads values in-process only; reading them yourself leaks them into context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the working-tree changes (vs main) for correctness, concurrency, architecture, testing, and API/doc issues — following .github/CODE_REVIEW.md — and return a severity-graded report. Scales the machinery to the diff size: a single code-reviewer agent for a small change, or a fan-out-and-verify Workflow for a large/multi-unit one. Produces findings; it does not apply fixes (the caller does).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep web research skill using parallel subagents + chromux browser-explorer + Gemini. Spawns multiple WebSearch research agents AND browser-explorer agents (via chromux for JS-heavy/dynamic sites), plus a Gemini CLI deep research source, then synthesizes everything into a cited report. Uses WebSearch, WebFetch, chromux browser-explorer, and Gemini CLI. Invoke with /deep-research <topic>.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze an open-source project from What/Why perspective (not how-it's-implemented). Use when the user says "/analyze-oss", "분석해줘 이 오픈소스", "이 레포 뭐하는거야", "analyze this repo", "what does X do", "이거 왜 쓰는거야", "이 라이브러리 분석", provides a GitHub URL and wants understanding, or asks to deeply understand an OSS project's purpose, value, target users, and usage flow. Clones the repo to ~/opensource-analysis/<repo-name>/ (git pull if already exists), dispatches parallel subagents per analysis lens, then synthesizes a What/Why-focused report in chat. Supports optional user-specific follow-up questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user wants to verify their changes before pushing, or update the project's rule checklists. Phase 1: validate changed files against .hoyeon/rules/ checklists and report PASS/WARN. Phase 2 (conditional): propose rule additions when unmatched patterns are detected. Essential before git push. Trigger phrases: "check", "checklist", "verify changes", "what did I miss", "pre-push check", "cascading changes", "any more changes needed", "update checklist", "update rules", "rules update", "체크", "체크리스트", "변경 확인", "빠뜨린 거 없나", "push 전 확인", "뭐 더 건드려야 해?", "연쇄 변경 확인", "규칙 갱신".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hoyeon deep research workflow for Codex. Use when the user invokes "$hoyeon-deep-research" or wants a multi-channel cited research report using web search, browser extraction, and optional Gemini. This adapter loads the canonical deep-research skill and follows its Codex runtime surface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fan out N parallel workers, drain them, and return one report. Use for /swarm, 'swarm this', or parallel coverage, races, gauntlets, and exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply after completing a task, before declaring done. Verify against the real artifact (run the feature, read the actual value, inspect the diff), not a proxy, self-report, or 'it compiles.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create polished HTML slide decks and PDF-ready documents for consulting deliverables. Uses the RRBC design system with warm light mode, dark mode cover pages, Lora/Inter/Roboto Mono typography, and data visualization palette. Trigger on 'deck', 'slides', 'presentation', 'pitch deck', 'keynote', 'report', or 'PDF'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-command GitHub repository health audit. Checks for missing standard files, GitHub configuration, branch protection, documentation quality, and code hygiene. Produces a scored health report with prioritized fix recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive market research reports (50+ pages) in the style of top consulting firms (McKinsey, BCG, Gartner). Professional LaTeX formatting, strategic analysis frameworks (Porter's Five Forces, PESTLE, SWOT, TAM/SAM/SOM, BCG Matrix), and deep research integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

生成一份对外可分享、脱敏的 AI-Native 开发者 README。 量化展示我对 Claude Code + Codex CLI + Kiro (AWS) + Trae (ByteDance) + Gemini Antigravity (Google) + Cursor 的使用深度、AI 协作风格、 项目与领域分布、兴趣主题，以及与 GitHub 提交的产出关联。 Trigger when the user says: "生成我的 AI 档案" / "做一份 AI-native README" / "分析我的 Claude / Codex / Kiro / Trae / Antigravity / Cursor 使用情况" / "总结我的 AI 使用" / "生成 AI 月度报告" / "按月份分析我的 AI 编码" / "分析 2026-05 的 AI 使用" / "build my AI usage profile" / "build my monthly AI coding report" / "analyze my AI usage for May 2026" / "summarize my Claude / Codex / Kiro / Trae / Antigravity / Cursor history" / "生成开发者画像". 全程本地、只读、默认匿名、不上传任何数据。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。