「what」の検索結果

Use when the user asks for a literature review, academic deep dive, research report, state-of-the-art survey, topic scoping, comparative analysis of methods/papers, grant background, or any request that needs multi-source scholarly evidence with citations. Also trigger proactively when a user question clearly requires academic grounding (e.g. "what's known about X", "compare approach A vs B in the literature", "summarize the field of Y"). Runs an 8-phase (Phase 0..7), script-driven research workflow across 7 federated sources (OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, PubMed, DBLP, bioRxiv, Exa) with optional Semantic Scholar / Brave MCP enrichment, with deduplication, transparent ranking, dual-backend citation chasing (OpenAlex + Semantic Scholar), self-critique, and structured report output with verifiable citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when looking up journal impact factors (JCR IF), checking a journal's impact factor by name, comparing IF across journals, or answering questions about "影响因子" / "impact factor" / "IF". Triggers on "impact factor", "journal IF", "影响因子", "JCR", "IF score", "journal rank", "which journal has higher IF", "what is the IF of". PROACTIVELY USE when user mentions journal prestige, publication venue quality, or manuscript submission target evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants full metadata for a paper — from a DOI, PMID, arXiv id, OpenAlex id, or title. Returns title, author list, first author, corresponding author(s), publication date, journal name + ISO-4 abbreviation, impact factor, volume/issue/pages, DOI/PMID, citation count, and abstract in one record. Triggers on "paper metadata", "who is the corresponding author", "first author of", "what journal / impact factor for this DOI/PMID", "cite this paper", "文献元数据", "通讯作者", "第一作者", "影响因子". PROACTIVELY USE when the user pastes a DOI/PMID/arXiv id or paper title and asks about its authors, venue, or impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO/GEO Agent Operations SOP v2 — Rebuilt from real-world operations (analook.com 0→launch, GSC incident, DataForSEO monitoring, gingiris.tools post-migration recovery). What's new in v2: • Step-by-step onboarding (Q1→Q6), multiple choice wherever possible — no big forms • Mandatory daily SEO log — first item is always GSC token status check • Data cross-validation rule: any external metric must come from ≥2 sources before use • Backlink progress tracking (6-week wait → check → alert if not indexed) • New vs. established site strategy matrix (new site <6mo: KD≤20; mature: KD up to 35+) Real incidents baked in: GSC token expired silently for 2 weeks (analook.com), P0 keywords dropped out of Top 100 after domain migration (gingiris.tools), traffic data off by 17× from single-source DataForSEO. Triggers: "SEO agent" | "SEO daily report" | "GSC monitoring" | "DataForSEO" | "GEO agent" | "backlink tracking" | "IndexNow" | "competitor comparison page" | "SEO SOP" | "autonomous SEO" | "GEO triple combo" 🇨🇳 SEO/GEO Agent 运营 SOP v2 — 基于真实运营经验重写（analook.com 从零建站 + GSC 断档 2 周 + DataForSEO 监控 + gingiris.tools 迁移权重恢复）。 对话式开局、强制日报（GSC token 是第一项）、数据交叉验证铁律、外链进度追踪、新老站区分策略。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Twitter/X Agent Operations SOP v2 — Rebuilt from real dual-account operations. Real data: • CN account: grew from 1,150 → 3,679 followers (~14 months), 1 tweet/day, OAuth1 direct post • EN account: Buffer API • Real incidents: cron silent-failed for 2 weeks unnoticed, analytics data off by 17×, thread performance worse than single posts What's new in v2: • Step-by-step onboarding (Q1→Q6), multiple choice wherever possible — no big forms • Mandatory daily log after every tweet + weekly report every Monday • Pre-publish safety checklist (agent must pass before posting) • Content pool tracker (used/unused) + alert when ≤3 items remain • Dual-account credential separation (CN: OAuth1 / EN: Buffer API) • MASTER-STATUS.md as the single source of truth — read + write every session 🇨🇳 Twitter/X Agent 运营 SOP v2 — 基于真实双账号运营经验重写。 开局对话式收集 context、强制日报+周报、发推前红线自检、素材库追踪、双账号凭证分离、MASTER-STATUS.md 单一真相来源。 真实数据：中文账号从 1,150 粉增长至 3,679 粉（约14个月），1条/天。 Triggers: "twitter运营" | "推特agent" | "发推SOP" | "AI代运营" | "推文日报" | "素材库" | "Buffer API" | "OAuth1发推" | "twitter automation" | "tweet sop" | "推特涨粉"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate an /insights-style HTML report across MANY of your agent coding sessions (Claude Code and OpenAI Codex): what you work on, how you use the agent, your wins, your friction points, and concrete fixes to become more effective — precise goal-setting, not trusting output blindly, scoping, context hygiene, right-sizing models. Reads local session history and writes one self-contained report.html. Use when the user asks to "разбери мои сессии", "оцени как я работаю с агентом", "мой insights", "session insights report", "review how I work", "на что обратить внимание", or runs "/mentor", "/mentor claude", "/mentor codex", "/mentor both". Do NOT use for reviewing the CODE produced (that's code-review) or building the agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Releasing Craft CMS plugins — tagging, Packagist propagation, GitHub releases, branch promotion, shared-library ordering, history rewrites. ALWAYS load when cutting, preparing, verifying, or debugging a plugin release: bumping a version, dating a changelog, creating or moving a git tag, or checking what Packagist serves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Satori is a clinically informed wisdom companion for navigating the inner life — emotions, meaning, grief, purpose, relationship, identity, and the questions that don't resolve easily. Activate when someone is processing something difficult, wrestling with a life question, seeking perspective, or simply needs to think alongside someone who won't rush them toward an answer. Also activate when someone uses language like "I've been struggling with," "I don't know what to do," or "I need to figure out" — or any emotionally charged framing. When in doubt, activate. Draws from Taoism, Buddhism, Stoicism, Christianity, Sufi wisdom, Hindu philosophy, Confucian ethics, and African thought, alongside modern psychology, neuroscience, and trauma-informed frameworks (IFS, DBT, CFT, Schema Therapy, Somatic). Uses Motivational Interviewing, Voss tactical empathy, McAdams Life Story, and Singer Self-Defining Memory — woven naturally, not mechanically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a kolu blog post grounded in the real build history — mine the Claude Code session logs behind a feature for the actual story (for large efforts, fan out over the transcripts with an ultracode workflow), draft it in the author's voice, and wire it into the Astro site. Use when asked to write a blog post or engineering essay about something that was built, especially one that should read as a narrative of what actually happened rather than invented marketing copy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan but do NOT have a brainstorm-beagle spec to plan against. quick-plan reconstructs intent from the current conversation, fans out domain-expert exploration subagents across the codebase, and synthesizes the same plan format write-plan produces — without requiring `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`. Triggers on: "quick plan", "plan this out", "plan what we just discussed", "turn this into an implementation plan", "plan this without a spec", "I don't have a spec, just plan it", "write-plan but no spec". Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants an implementation or TDD plan and there is no spec to plan against — even if they just say "plan it" after discussing a feature. Writes to `.beagle/plans/<slug>/plan.md`. If a finalized spec already exists at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`, prefer write-plan. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to build or think through a strategy via guided conversation — for a company, product, team, career, or initiative. Triggers on "help me figure out our direction", "what should we focus on", strategic planning, competitive positioning, go-to-market strategy. Also catches indirect requests like prioritization struggles or "we have too many priorities". Does NOT review existing strategy documents (use strategy-review) or brainstorm project features (use brainstorm-beagle).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants web research: gathering cited, multi-angle evidence on a specific question. Triggers on: "research X for me", "do web research on", "look up sources for", "find citations for", "gather evidence on", "what does the web say about X". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), local file search, LLM-as-judge evaluation, or paywalled/auth-gated scraping. Produces a written plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, critiquing, or stress-testing an existing strategy document. Evaluates seven dimensions — diagnosis quality, guiding policy strength, action coherence, assumption exposure, falsifiability — with optional 7S, Five Forces, Balanced Scorecard, and Hoshin Kanri lenses. Triggers on: review my strategy, poke holes in this plan, what's weak here, strategy audit, red team this. Does NOT build strategy (use strategy-interview) or brainstorm project ideas (use brainstorm-beagle).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

List all available agents (core, expert, self-evolving). Use when the user asks what agents are available or runs /agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

List all available skills grouped by category. Use when the user asks what skills are available or runs /skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entity-aware code change analysis using the pi-sem tools. Use when the user asks what changed, wants blast radius or affected tests, needs focused context for a function/class, wants review help on a commit/branch/PR, or asks to compare semantic diff with raw git diff. Prefer sem_context and sem_impact; use sem_diff selectively for summaries and reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the reasoning of a document or argument (memo, proposal, investment analysis, board paper, article, the user's own draft): claims, evidence, unstated assumptions, logical gaps, fallacies, and what would falsify it, each anchored to quoted text. Use whenever the user wants reasoning examined, in any language ("audit this argument", "is this analysis sound", "poke holes in this proposal", "review the logic of my draft"; Vietnamese "phản biện giúp tôi", "soi lập luận này", "tài liệu này có lỗ hổng gì", "góp ý bản nháp của tôi"), even when they never say "critical thinking". Also use when the user drops a document and asks whether to trust or act on it, or asks to see their reasoning profile. Not for company-level strategic bets (strategy-board) or learning a topic through dialogue (socratic-questor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Act as the team's Scrum Master of record, or copilot to a human one: plan sprints, run daily pulses, close sprints, prepare and follow up retrospectives, track and escalate impediments, and detect process anti-patterns across sprint history. Use whenever the user asks for Scrum or agile process help, in any language — "plan the sprint", "chuẩn bị retro", "how is the sprint going", "our velocity dropped", "track this blocker", "the same problem keeps coming back" — even without the word "Scrum", and whenever `_project/scrum-master/` exists and the question touches sprints, ceremonies, impediments, or team process health. Not for delivery dates and budget (project-manager) or deciding what to build (product-manager).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Act as an end-to-end data scientist: turn business questions into defensible analysis, validated models, and decision-ready reports. Use whenever the user asks to analyze, explore, or profile a dataset or CSV/Parquet/Excel file; asks what drives a metric or why a number changed ("why did churn go up?"); wants to test whether a difference is real (A/B tests, experiments, "is this significant?", "how many samples do I need?"); wants a predictive model (churn, forecast, scoring, segmentation, classification, regression); asks to review an existing analysis, notebook, or model for flaws; or needs results written up for decision-makers. Triggers in any language ("phân tích dữ liệu", "xây model dự đoán", "kiểm định A/B"), even when they never say "data science" or "statistics".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Emergency fund analyzer. Calculates the right emergency fund size based on job stability, family structure, fixed expenses, dependents, and employee vs. business-owner status. Recommends where to keep it (HYSA, money market, T-bills, I-Bonds), how fast to build it, what counts as a true emergency, and how to replenish after use. Produces FINANCE-EMERGENCY.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。