「acceptance」の検索結果

Works backward from the stated goal through its prerequisite chain — what must exist to reach the goal, then what each of those requires, back to the current state — classifying each prerequisite as AVAILABLE, DERIVABLE, or MISSING, and blocking planning until nothing is MISSING. Use before creating plans, delegating to agents, or defining acceptance criteria. Activates on specs, PRDs, tickets, RFCs, architecture designs, and multi-step engineering tasks. Always pass `#N` or an inline goal — invoking with no argument and no inline context returns BLOCKED. Integrates with CoVe-style planning pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when SAM Stage 5 Execution has completed and task results need independent verification against acceptance criteria. Dispatches a separate reviewer agent to fact-check implementation outputs and returns COMPLETE or NEEDS_WORK with specific findings and remediation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose work into stages with physical artifacts and acceptance checklists. Gap detector. Use when opening a WP ≥3h (open-loop/problem-framing) or on explicit request to break into stages. Executes R29 Decomposer role.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for JWT, JWS, and JWE validation paths, header parsing, key selection, claim acceptance, audience and issuer checks, role derivation, and token-to-identity confusion bugs. Use when the user asks to inspect JWT headers or claims, key lookup, `kid` handling, `alg` confusion, audience or issuer validation, role claims, or explain how a token becomes accepted identity or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for forced-auth coercion, relay chains, target selection, NTLM or related acceptance paths, and coercion-to-privilege transitions. Use when the user asks to trace a coercion primitive, follow a relay path, analyze forced authentication, determine which service accepts relayed auth, or connect a coercion step to resulting privilege, enrollment, or code execution. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for DPAPI masterkeys, vault blobs, browser credential stores, protected secrets, domain backup keys, and secret-to-acceptance replay chains. Use when the user asks to inspect DPAPI blobs or masterkeys, recover browser or vault credentials, trace DPAPI context or backup-key use, or explain how protected Windows secrets become accepted access or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

上线前业务方/产品方验收时使用。适用于功能交付确认、UAT、发布会签。融合 BDD Given-When-Then、Specification by Example、ATDD。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-knowledge for stella, the self-hosted AI assistant. Use when users ask about configuration, setup, onboarding, providers, models, agents, channels, webhooks, memory, schedules, workflows, goals, workers, skills, plugins, session compaction, notifications, self-update, multi-user behavior, or how stella works. Also use for changing models, setting up channels or webhooks, configuring providers, updating stella, onboarding, switching agents, reporting bugs, and goal status or acceptance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a plain-language idea into a tested Chrome Manifest V3 extension, release bundle, store materials, and a resumable launch workflow using Codex skills and Playwright MCP acceptance checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess a public HTTP(S) page before building browser automation, extraction, or an integration. Use this skill to collect bounded structural evidence, readiness signals, risk flags, acceptance tests, and remediation priorities without sending credentials or accessing private targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert product specification and documentation writer. Use when creating PRDs, user stories, acceptance criteria, technical specifications, API documentation, edge case analysis, design handoff docs, feature flag plans, or success metrics. Covers the full spectrum from high-level requirements to implementation-ready specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured software specifications for features, bug fixes, and products. Use when the user wants to create a spec, PRD, feature brief, requirements document, or when starting any new implementation that needs a specification first. Invoke via /spec-writer or when the user says "write a spec", "spec this out", "create a spec", "I need a spec for...", or describes a feature they want to build. Produces adaptive-complexity specs with Job Stories, Gherkin acceptance criteria, and three-tier boundaries. Output is a markdown file ready for agent execution or human review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when turning a vague idea or user request into a structured document, scoping a feature with goals and non-goals, defining success metrics and acceptance criteria, or breaking a big ask into a phased spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when filing one or more GitHub issues for planned work — "file an issue for this", "turn this plan into issues", "open a tracking issue". Covers filing everything on skyf0xx/hedgehog regardless of which repo's code changes, whether to split a plan into a tracking issue plus sub-issues, which account files the issue, labels, and acceptance criteria. For how to word an issue, see the pr-writing skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate test files from acceptance criteria or existing code. Supports criteria-driven mode (from specs/tasks) and code-analysis mode (from source files). Auto-detects test framework and spawns test-writer agents for parallel generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply MCAF feature-spec guidance to create or update a feature spec under `docs/Features/` with business rules, user flows, system behaviour, verification, and Definition of Done. Use when the user asks for a feature spec, executable requirements, acceptance criteria, behaviour documentation, or a pre-implementation plan for non-trivial behaviour changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

QA validation and fix loop workflow — validates implementation completeness then iterates fix cycles until all acceptance criteria pass and quality gates clear

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review execution against the frozen Execution Contract, produce Evidence/Gaps, and decide pass or unfreeze. Use after ac-execute or at milestone acceptance gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt JSON Web Token (JWT) vulnerabilities — alg=none bypass, RS256→HS256 key confusion, weak HMAC secret cracking, kid path traversal, JWKS injection, jku/x5u header attacks, embedded JWK confusion, expired-token acceptance, claim mutability, and token replay. Use when an app uses JWT for authentication or stateless sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to scope, write, or audit a product spec — a PRD, feature spec, user stories, acceptance criteria, or a "spec this out"/"break this into stories"/"definition of done" request — or wants an existing spec reviewed for gaps and anti-patterns. Triggers whenever a feature idea needs to become structured requirements that align a team on what to build. For the analytics behind success metrics, use data-analysis; for the technical design, use software-architect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Release a new version of an R package including version bumping, NEWS.md updates, git tagging, GitHub release creation, and post-release development version setup. Use when a package is ready for a new patch, minor, or major release, after CRAN acceptance to create the corresponding GitHub release, or when setting up the development version bump immediately after a release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and maintain a product or project backlog with prioritized items, acceptance criteria, and estimates. Covers user story writing, MoSCoW prioritization, backlog grooming, item splitting, and status tracking. Use when starting a new project and converting scope into actionable items, during ongoing grooming before sprint planning, re-prioritizing after stakeholder feedback or scope changes, or splitting oversized items into implementable pieces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured GitHub issue creation from review findings or task breakdowns. Groups related findings into logical issues, applies labels, and produces issues with standard templates including summary, findings, and acceptance criteria. Designed to consume output from review-codebase or similar review skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independently review a Proto UI change against current authority, bounded scope, executable evidence, projections, provenance, and integration conditions. Use for pull-request review, acceptance review, pre-merge audit, or fresh-context verification. Do not use to approve one's own work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。