945 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Test web applications with screen readers including VoiceOver, NVDA, and JAWS. Use when validating screen reader compatibility, debugging accessibility issues, or ensuring assistive technology support.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Extended thinking: This workflow implements a sophisticated debugging and resolution pipeline that leverages AI-assisted debugging tools and observability platforms to systematically diagnose and res
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are an accessibility expert specializing in WCAG compliance, inclusive design, and assistive technology compatibility. Conduct audits, identify barriers, and provide remediation guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research-brief + claim-record discipline for delegated or AI-assisted research work. Use when starting any substantive research task or long autonomous run (write the brief first), and when reporting results that will support a claim in a paper or decision (produce the claim record). Keeps faster execution from being confused with credible evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a funder-compliant Data Management Plan (NSF DMP, NIH DMS Policy 2023, ERC, Horizon Europe) by composing the confidential-data and environment-capture primitives. Sections cover data description, formats/metadata, storage/backup, access/sharing, preservation/archiving, and roles. Use when user says "data management plan", "DMP", "DMSP", "NIH data sharing plan", "write the data plan for my grant", or when a grant proposal needs a data-management section. NOT a submission tool — produces a draft the user pastes into the funder portal (DMPTool, NIH ASSIST, Horizon Europe portal).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add a Jev-powered decision and release gate after an office assistant generates a report, proposal, spreadsheet, document, or slide deck. Use for claim-to-evidence checks, narrow requirement decisions, risk triage, and human-review routing; do not use it to generate the deliverable or claim that Jev browsed or verified a URL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end user research assistant — qualitative and quantitative. Use this skill whenever the user mentions user research, user interviews, discussion guides, interview guides, research plans, qualitative research, quantitative research, user surveys, survey design, usability studies, participant recruitment, research synthesis, interview transcripts, research reports, running studies with AI, or explicitly mentions Cookiy AI. Also trigger when users want to talk to customers, conduct discovery research, create a study or survey, analyze interview data, run AI-moderated interviews, or collect survey responses. Covers the full lifecycle: planning studies, creating discussion guides, running AI-moderated interviews (real or synthetic) via Cookiy, designing and distributing surveys, and synthesizing results into reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design evaluation datasets and supporting documentation for AI systems and agents, covering the scoping interview, difficulty distribution, dataset contract, sample review, and metric and tooling selection. Use when building or reviewing an evaluation set for a conversational agent, assistant, or retrieval-grounded AI system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decide which of your recurring rituals to put on autopilot — and which to keep manual. Use when asked what to automate, how to set up recurring AI runs, which reports or briefings could run on a schedule, or to design an automation charter for a team. Produces a ritual inventory with automate/assist/keep-manual calls, guardrails per ritual, and a rollout order.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review AI-authored code for its characteristic failure modes — plausible-but-wrong logic, hallucinated APIs, over-engineering, dead scaffolding, and silent security shortcuts. Use when reviewing an AI-generated or heavily AI-assisted PR, when AI-written code keeps shipping subtle bugs, or when setting review standards for a team using coding agents. Produces a focused review with AI-specific findings, verification steps per risk class, and a team checklist for AI-authored changes. For general PR review use code-review-checklist — this skill covers what that one assumes a human wouldn't do.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a PRD for an AI-powered feature, covering the things normal PRDs miss. Use when asked to spec an AI/LLM feature, write a PRD for a feature that uses a model, or plan an AI capability (assistant, summarizer, generator, classifier). Produces an AI feature PRD — problem & UX of uncertainty, model approach, eval criteria, guardrails, fallback behaviour, the data flywheel, and cost/latency budget.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Figure out which AI tool actually fits the task in front of you — chatbot, coding assistant, image model, agent, or none — instead of forcing one tool onto everything. Use when asked which AI tool should I use for, what's the best AI for, do I even need AI for this, or should I use ChatGPT or something else. Produces a match between your task and the right kind of AI tool (with why), the trade-offs that matter for your case, when the answer is a non-AI tool or plain human effort, and how to try it cheaply before committing — so you pick by fit, not by hype or habit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a content library, docs site, or blog for AI-generated filler that's eroding trust and search performance — and triage what to fix, rewrite, or delete. Use when asked to find slop in a content library, audit AI-written content quality, explain why content engagement or rankings dropped after scaling with AI, or set a quality bar for AI-assisted publishing. Produces an audited inventory with per-piece verdicts, the detection signals used, a triage plan, and a publishing quality gate that prevents recurrence. For a single article's AI-citability use aeo-optimizer; for the strategy itself use content-calendar or seo-content-brief.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when planning, redesigning, or reviewing Xiaohongshu carousel visuals, covers, 3:4 image posts, page-by-page visual direction, image-generation prompts, style selection, layout critique, or XHS captions. It acts as a senior visual director for 小红书图文, not a generic copywriting assistant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users build functional product prototypes from natural language or visual mocks using AI coding tools. This skill enables product leaders to bypass engineering bottlenecks and validate ideas through hands-on building.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scholarly research companion using Knows sidecar spec (.knows.yaml). Generates, validates, reviews, queries, and compares structured research-paper sidecars, and fetches them from knows.academy. Use for academic literature search, survey synthesis, paper authoring assistance, and peer review with token-efficient claim/evidence/relation access.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Regression testing strategies for AI-assisted development. Sandbox-mode API testing without database dependencies, automated bug-check workflows, and patterns to catch AI blind spots where the same model writes and reviews code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for AI-assisted Unity work that needs live repo discovery, project-derived routing, runtime-owner proof, runtime-visible output hard stops, runtime numeric proof for repeated visible-output failures, state-step guards, multi-agent scope ownership, modular C#/asmdef safety, UI/scene/visual asset gates, data-first content changes, validation, cleanup proof, or durable workflow rules. Best when agents must prove the actual folder/module/scene/prefab/runtime owner before editing, especially runtime UI, generated assets, code graphs, tutorial/state flows, guided selection/action flows, overlay/dim source-bound mistakes, coordinate conversions, focus/highlight/marker/HUD alignment, predictive lead aiming, ballistic trajectories, spatial IoU verification, or repeated "fix still not visible" failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing an accepted ACL main-conference or Findings paper for camera-ready, covering the extra content page, de-anonymization and acknowledgements, AI-assistance disclosure, keeping the Limitations section, ACL Anthology metadata and CC BY 4.0 publication, meta-review-driven edits, and presentation-mode logistics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when explaining or planning around AAAI's two-phase review process, Phase 1 rejection risk, Phase 2 additional reviews, AI-assisted review pilot, author feedback, SPC/AC discussion, and final decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Render pixel-accurate ChatGPT mobile (iOS) screen mockups in light mode from a thread JSON. Supports user text bubbles, user image attachments, assistant markdown prose, citation chips, the OpenAI spiral logo, the Apps-SDK GPT chip in the composer, and three header styles (model-tag, plain title, "Get Plus"). Fixed 9:16 viewport. Outputs HTML + PNG.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assemble a ChatGPT chat-reveal video ad from a thread + timeline JSON — one continuous Playwright recording of a ChatGPT mobile chat (user types with the iOS keyboard up → taps send → keyboard slides down + header cluster swaps in one beat → one gray loading dot → the assistant answer streams in word-by-word) crossfaded into a designed end card, with subliminal ChatGPT SFX and an optional ducked music bed. FREE assembly (Playwright + ffmpeg); the recipe supplies the per-brand thread + timeline + end-card config and gates the paid music call to its own capability. The ChatGPT sibling of render-imessage-chat. Use for the chatgpt-chat format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Register, add, or update existing custom Simulink block libraries and configure block policy and knowledge index. Use when a user wants to register, set up, configure, or add existing .slx library files for agent-assisted model building. Do NOT use when the user wants to create or author a new library from scratch — that requires building-simulink-models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and audit SwiftUI, UIKit, and AppKit accessibility for VoiceOver, Voice Control, Switch Control, Full Keyboard Access, Dynamic Type, focus restoration, labels/traits/actions, traversal, custom rotors, NSAccessibility, XCTest checks, adaptive system preferences, and App Store accessibility declarations. Use when implementing accessible UI, fixing an accessibility audit, testing assistive-technology behavior, or substantiating App Store Accessibility Nutrition Labels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。