331 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use this skill when the user asks the difference between a freight broker, freight forwarder, and motor carrier (49 CFR 371 + 373) — required authority for each, bond requirements (BMC-84 broker bond, BMC-85 freight forwarder bond), broker-carrier agreements, factoring + commissions, double brokering, and how to identify each role on a Bill of Lading. Cite 49 CFR 371 + 373.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about US-Canada cross-border CMV operations — CVOR (Commercial Vehicle Operator's Registration), NSC (National Safety Code), Ontario / Quebec / BC specific rules, US carrier obtaining Canadian operating authority, FAST card for drivers, customs (CBSA), Health Canada hazmat, and how Transport Canada equivalents differ from US FMCSA. Reference USMCA + Transport Canada NSC 14.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill if your operating authority has been revoked and you need to reinstate. Covers application, fees, and timeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick the right writing voice for a task — which voice playbook applies, nk-writer invocation, brand-writer invocation, /mxm-voice-route. Lookup wrapper over the operator's voice selection authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and improve the internal link structure of an AEM Edge Delivery Services site. Builds a link graph from the query index and page content, identifies orphan pages, hub pages, and content silos, and generates specific linking recommendations with suggested anchor text and placement. Use when improving site navigation, fixing orphan pages, strengthening topical authority, or auditing link equity distribution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code-review quality gate and test-enhancement rubric. Use when ROSE needs sharper review output contracts, severity and risk prioritization, evidence anchors, negative review cases, fixture or golden-output drift guidance, or a Chinese review report profile; do not use as a duplicate code-review agent or final PASS authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Social engineering attack techniques beyond email phishing for authorized red team and physical penetration testing engagements. Covers pretexting methodology (persona creation, authority and urgency psychological triggers, rapport building), vishing (voice phishing via caller ID spoofing, IVR system exploitation, VoIP infrastructure setup with Twilio/Asterisk), smishing (SMS-based phishing, carrier gateway abuse, short code impersonation), physical social engineering (tailgating and piggybacking, RFID badge cloning with Proxmark3, lock picking and bypass, dumpster diving for sensitive documents), USB drop attacks (Rubber Ducky keystroke injection, Bash Bunny multi-vector payloads, O.MG cable covert implants, BadUSB firmware attacks), watering hole attack planning and execution, and OSINT-driven targeting (LinkedIn harvesting, organizational chart reconstruction, employee pattern analysis). Integrates with the Social Engineering Toolkit for attack automation, Proxmark3 for RFID/NFC cloning, USB Rubber Duc...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive Windows privilege escalation methodology for offensive security engagements. Covers the full attack surface from a standard user shell to NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM: token impersonation via SeImpersonate and SeAssignPrimaryToken privileges using JuicyPotato, PrintSpoofer, GodPotato, SweetPotato, and RoguePotato; service misconfigurations including unquoted service paths, weak service DACLs, writable service binaries, and insecure service creation permissions; AlwaysInstallElevated MSI exploitation; DLL hijacking through search order abuse, phantom DLL loading, and writable PATH directory injection; UAC bypass techniques via fodhelper.exe, eventvwr.exe, CMSTP, and environment variable manipulation; scheduled task abuse for writable task actions and new task creation; registry autorun exploitation for persistence and escalation; PrintNightmare (CVE-2021-34527) for remote and local privilege escalation; and credential harvesting from SAM database extraction, DPAPI blob decryption, LSA secret dumping,...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interpret and design bounded FIPA communicative-act exchanges using XC00037H semantics while keeping delivery, authority, and external effects separate. NOT for proving delivery, task authorization, or external effect completion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design dashboards for migrations and runtimes. Use for authority drift, verifier status, burn-down, runtime health, or pain panels. NOT for vanity analytics, ad hoc charts, or duplicate reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs, reconciles, and reviews an end-to-end Drydock program for safely staging agent runtimes: immutable worktree provenance, disposable VM containment, typed effect brokerage, global body accounting, resurrection, subscription-capacity economics, context compaction, operator control, evidence, and promotion. Use when several Drydock contracts must compose into one architecture, implementation hypertree, diagram set, or release plan. NOT for launching Port Daddy, running an untrusted subject, replacing focused containment/resurrection/capacity audits, or treating a design packet as runtime authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and diagnose FIPA-style ontology-service interactions while keeping declared ontology relations, provider capability, and application authorization separate. NOT for treating an ontology mapping as provider authority or guaranteed interoperability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply GPGP/TAEMS coordination as local-scheduler constraints under explicit task, view, commitment, and delivery assumptions. NOT for assuming global task visibility, reliable delivery, or modern execution authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and validate versioned DAGs with typed dependencies, gates, and evidence-bound readiness. NOT for executing a DAG, granting work authority, or treating an unverified gate as cleared.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Threat-models protocols where authority, scarce resources, bonds, bounties, escrow, reputation, ordering, adjudication, or settlement create strategic incentives. Use to test attack utility, conservation, collusion, Sybil resistance, oracle capture, griefing, custody, liquidity, and residual risk. NOT for choosing payment or bond amounts without evidence, smart-contract code audit, legal or employment classification, DeFi trading, admitting workers, or settling claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design AgentSpeak-style BDI plan libraries with explicit event, context, failure, and authority boundaries. NOT for treating BDI plans as safety approval or guaranteed execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan or audit the cross-layer Harbor cooperative editor: Loro replicas for humans and agents, governed edit claims, salvage authority, and transport across shared, LAN, and remote harbors. Use when a change spans editor collaboration, identity, recovery, or transport contracts. For a single GPUI pane use gpui-rust-console; for motion use rust-gpui-motion; for a shader use gpui-shaders. NOT for non-collaborative screens, web editors, or generic Rust development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design discovery, directories, and guilds for agent swarms at scale. Use when agents need to find each other on a shared surface: capability indices, yellow-pages directories, whois/phonebook routing, reputation-aware discovery, and guild structures that scope trust. Covers the canonical prior art (FIPA Directory Facilitator, Contract Net, Chord/DHT, DNS-SD/Consul, EigenTrust, Greif's merchant guilds) and the failure modes (read-poverty, Sybil reset, Goodhart on rank, directory staleness, cold-start). Triggers: "agents can't find each other", "who owns this file/skill", "route a question to the right agent", "capability registry", "agent reputation", "guild / federation of fleets". NOT for issuing identities, granting authority, or automatically assigning work from a directory entry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and audits closed, ordered, replay-safe message protocols between already admitted agent bodies. Use when a multi-agent exchange needs explicit epochs, audiences, per-sender sequencing, gathers, terminal fences, acknowledgements, and deterministic replay. NOT for selecting or spawning agents, granting identity or authority, choosing a runtime topology, general human facilitation, wire transport implementation, or deciding whether evidence is true.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。