「comments」の検索結果

Full inbox management across all channels — WhatsApp (wacli), Email (Gmail MCP), Slack (MCP), Telegram (user-auth MCP), Discord (webhook + REST read), Notion (MCP — comments, mentions, assigned tasks). Scans FULL inbox (not just unread), identifies messages needing replies, archives handled conversations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous PR merge pipeline. Scans all repos for open PRs, dispatches subagents to fix CI, resolve conflicts, address review comments, then merges. Use --main to also sync dev↔main branches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate YouTube tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): upload videos, manage playlists, search content, get analytics, and handle comments. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Presentation creation, editing, and analysis. When Claude needs to work with presentations (.pptx files) for: (1) Creating new presentations, (2) Modifying or editing content, (3) Working with layouts, (4) Adding comments or speaker notes, or any other presentation tasks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate Notion tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): pages, databases, blocks, comments, users. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate Reddit tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): search subreddits, create posts, manage comments, and browse top content. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate Figma tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): files, components, design tokens, comments, exports. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run browser-grounded social research without remote account mutations through Jev Social when a user wants posts, profiles, comments, video evidence, or a source-linked report from Instagram, TikTok, or LinkedIn and the local socai CLI reports support for that platform. Do not use for publishing, engagement actions, or general web research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate Jira tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): issues, projects, sprints, boards, comments, users. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate LinkedIn tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): create posts, manage profile, company info, comments, and image uploads. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate ClickUp project management including tasks, spaces, folders, lists, comments, and team operations via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Golang OpenAPI/Swagger documentation with swaggo/swag — annotation comments (@Summary, @Param, @Success, @Router, @Security), swag init code generation, framework integrations (gin, echo, fiber, chi, net/http), security definitions (Bearer/JWT, OAuth2, API key), and struct tags (swaggertype, enums, example, swaggerignore). Apply when adding or maintaining Swagger/OpenAPI docs in a Go project, or when the codebase imports github.com/swaggo/swag, github.com/swaggo/gin-swagger, github.com/swaggo/echo-swagger, github.com/swaggo/http-swagger, or github.com/swaggo/files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review oh-my-hermes pull requests that have not been reviewed at their current head commit. Run manually to sweep the open backlog, or pass a number to review one PR. Applies the repository's REVIEW.md policy and posts findings as a GitHub review with inline comments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch GitHub issues, spawn sub-agents to implement fixes and open PRs, then monitor and address PR review comments. Usage: /gh-issues [owner/repo] [--label bug] [--limit 5] [--milestone v1.0] [--assignee @me] [--fork user/repo] [--watch] [--interval 5] [--reviews-only] [--cron] [--dry-run] [--model glm-5] [--notify-channel -1002381931352]

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to process, triage, fetch, view, count, list, or resolve review feedback in a GitHub PR. Supports both CodeRabbit and Codex review workflows. In this workflow, “real review feedback” is strictly defined as actionable inline comments; for CodeRabbit, exclude review summaries and nitpicks, and for Codex, exclude review summary cards and use PR main-thread reactions only as status signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make AI-generated writing read as human-written, in fiction and in professional prose. Repairs the narrative architecture of fiction and stories (based on StoryScope, arXiv:2604.03136); routes professional text through domain rules for release notes, announcements, PR and issue replies, code-review comments, incident postmortems, tickets, work orders, technical articles, blog posts, and long-form journalism. Four operations - write, review (diagnose AI tells without editing), refactor (minimal in-place edits), recreate (full rewrite). Use when asked to humanize, de-AI, unslop, or strip AI flavor from any text; when writing or revising any of these document types; or whenever output must not read as machine-written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "set up my founder social-selling routine", "build a daily engagement block for target accounts", or "turn funding / hiring signals into selling plays"; produces the founder/seller daily operating block — a time-boxed engagement-block spec (substantive value-add comments on target-account posts, never a pitch), warm-touch-before-ask cadence rules, trigger-response plays consuming the social-pulse-monitor B2B trigger watchlist (funding / hiring / launch signals), and a quarterly diagnostic that reads LinkedIn SSI as an input diagnostic only (Estimated, vendor-defined — never a target metric). All volume norms are Estimated/community-derived; all execution is human — zero mass-DM, zero connection-request automation, zero engagement automation (LinkedIn UA §8.2 red line); 1:1 pitch and DM mechanics route to outreach-manager. Not for cold email sequences — use cold-outbound-sequencer. 社交销售/创始人日常互动块/热身触达节奏/触发信号剧本

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "triage our comments, DMs, and mentions", "draft replies to this thread", "can we repost this fan post", or "set up inbox SLAs and an escalation path"; produces a ranked triage queue with register detection (sincere / ironic / performative / parasocial, sentiment-inversion table included — "this is so bad" under a comedy register is praise), a commenter taxonomy (troll monitor-only / rager / misguided / unhappy-customer / advocate) with a response-tier ladder and per-channel SLAs, an escalation matrix ending at the crisis path, a moderation ladder plus house rules for owned spaces, and a UGC curation-and-rights mode whose dated permission entries route to the channel registry — every reply is a ranked DRAFT a human posts; nothing is ever auto-sent. Not for launch-window feedback triage — use launch-feedback-synthesizer. 评论私信提及分诊/语域识别/回复草稿/UGC授权

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "triage launch feedback", "cluster reviews, comments, and board posts into themes", or "set up a you asked, we shipped loop"; produces a feedback theme digest (frequency, severity, representative quotes per theme), an open→planned→started→completed/declined status loop with duplicate-merge and notification rules, shipped-change announcement material, and a compliant social-proof harvest protocol (never incentivized store reviews). Not for repurposing or amplifying the harvested proof — use content-amplifier; not for executing testimonial outreach threads — use outreach-manager. 反馈分诊/状态环/社证收割/评测合规

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove AI-generated code slop, unnecessary comments, and over-engineering from the current branch diff. Cleans up boilerplate, simplifies abstractions, strips defensive code, and in skill-file mode lints SKILL.md files for quality. Use when cleaning up code, simplifying, removing boilerplate, before committing, or when reviewing a skill before promoting it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor a PR's CI checks and Greptile code review after submission. Polls CI status, auto-fixes failures via ralph-loop, waits for Greptile review, addresses comments, and iterates until green.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill any time a .pptx or .potx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx or .potx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an email or summary); editing, modifying, or updating existing presentations; combining or splitting slide files; working with templates (.potx), layouts, speaker notes, or comments. Trigger whenever the user mentions "deck," "slides," "presentation," or references a .pptx or .potx filename, regardless of what they plan to do with the content afterward. If a .pptx or .potx file needs to be opened, created, or touched, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files) or Word templates (.dotx files). Triggers include: any mention of 'Word doc', 'word document', '.docx', '.dotx', or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when extracting or reorganizing content from .docx or .dotx files, inserting or replacing images in documents, performing find-and-replace in Word files, working with tracked changes or comments, or converting content into a polished Word document. If the user asks for a 'report', 'memo', 'letter', 'template', or similar deliverable as a Word or .docx file, use this skill. Do NOT use for PDFs, spreadsheets, Google Docs, or general coding tasks unrelated to document generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage software complexity through deep modules, information hiding, and strategic programming. Use when the user mentions "module design", "API too complex", "shallow class", "complexity budget", "strategic vs tactical", "deep module", "information leakage", "pass-through method", "this code is over-engineered", or "simplify this design". Also trigger when reviewing an interface for simplicity, evaluating whether an abstraction is pulling its weight, deciding whether a comment is worth writing, or choosing between general-purpose and special-purpose approaches. Covers deep vs shallow modules, red flags for complexity, and comments as design documentation. For code quality, see clean-code. For architecture boundaries, see clean-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。