「decision」の検索結果

Run an explicitly requested decision interview and record each settled decision in durable project documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an explicitly requested decision interview and record each settled decision in durable project documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to apply psychological principles, mental models, or behavioral science to marketing. Also use when the user mentions 'psychology,' 'mental models,' 'cognitive bias,' 'persuasion,' 'behavioral science,' 'why people buy,' 'decision-making,' 'consumer behavior,' 'anchoring,' 'social proof,' 'scarcity,' 'loss aversion,' 'framing,' or 'nudge.' Use this whenever someone wants to understand or leverage how people think and make decisions in a marketing context. For applying psychology to specific pages, see cro; for pricing tactics, see pricing; for copy framing, see copywriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Supports structured what-if scenario analysis for research planning, experimental contingencies, and scientific project decisions. Explores favorable, reference, adverse, wild-card, contrarian, and second-order scenarios with explicit assumptions, evidence, and decision triggers. Use to stress-test a research plan under uncertainty; scenario narratives do not estimate causal effects or calibrated forecast probabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares and validates research-only clinical decision-support evaluation, evidence-profile, cohort, survival, biomarker/model, privacy, and governance artifacts. Supports aggregate or synthetic research documentation and traceability, excluding patient care and live clinical operation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authors a Dynamics 365 Finance and Supply Chain Management Solution Blueprint from scratch through a structured, section-by-section architect interview, establishing scope, target operating model, application and data architecture, integration landscape, migration strategy, security model, ALM, testing, deployment, and support approach, with a decision log capturing rationale and rejected alternatives. Use when the user wants to create D365 implementation architecture documentation, start a D365 implementation, design the architecture, prepare a Solution Blueprint, or identify the architectural decisions the programme must make. Do not use for critique of an existing design; that is a review task rather than blueprint authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Harbor intake for external work — the captain only handles unresolved decisions. Sweeps incoming issues and PRs, verifies every claim before disposition, reuses every decision already made, and hands the maintainer a docket whose pending items each carry one question with options, recommendation, impact and evidence. Agent-autonomous for facts and for actions covered by standing authorization; signed for every new judgment. Never merges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executive leadership guidance for strategic decision-making, organizational development, and stakeholder management. Includes strategy analyzer, financial scenario modeling, board governance frameworks, and investor relations playbooks. Use when planning strategy, preparing board presentations, managing investors, developing organizational culture, making executive decisions, or when user mentions CEO, strategic planning, board meetings, investor updates, organizational leadership, or executive strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search conversation history and semantic memory to recall previous discussions, decisions, and context. Use when the user asks to "search memory", "what did we discuss", "remember when", "find previous conversation", "check history", or before starting work to recall prior decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when scientists need help with research problem selection, project ideation, troubleshooting stuck projects, or strategic scientific decisions. Use this skill when users ask to pitch a new research idea, work through a project problem, evaluate project risks, plan research strategy, navigate decision trees, or get help choosing what scientific problem to work on. Typical requests include "I have an idea for a project", "I'm stuck on my research", "help me evaluate this project", "what should I work on", or "I need strategic advice about my research".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when choosing between technologies (e.g., Kafka vs SQS), documenting a design decision with trade-offs and consequences, reviewing a system design proposal, or designing a new component from requirements and constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The session loop that makes agentmemory pay off, recall before starting work, save at decision points, learn from corrections. Use when starting a nontrivial task, after settling a decision or debugging a gotcha, or whenever deciding if something belongs in memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial thinking partner for founders and executives. Stress-tests plans, prepares for brutal board meetings, dissects decisions with no good options, and forces honest post-mortems. Use when you need someone to find the holes before the board does, make a decision you've been avoiding, or understand what actually went wrong.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "design system architecture", "evaluate microservices vs monolith", "create architecture diagrams", "analyze dependencies", "choose a database", "plan for scalability", "make technical decisions", or "review system design". Use for architecture decision records (ADRs), tech stack evaluation, system design reviews, dependency analysis, and generating architecture diagrams in Mermaid, PlantUML, or ASCII format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent board meeting protocol for strategic decisions. Runs a structured 6-phase deliberation: context loading, independent C-suite contributions (isolated, no cross-pollination), critic analysis, synthesis, founder review, and decision extraction. Use when the user invokes /cs:boardroom, calls a board meeting, or wants structured multi-perspective executive deliberation on a strategic question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executive leadership guidance for strategic decision-making, organizational development, and stakeholder management. Use when planning strategy, preparing board presentations, managing investors, developing organizational culture, making executive decisions, fundraising, or when user mentions CEO, strategic planning, board meetings, investor updates, organizational leadership, or executive strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture conversations and decisions into structured Notion pages; use when turning chats/notes into wiki entries, how-tos, decisions, or FAQs with proper linking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an ADR documenting a technical decision: context, alternatives considered, consequences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trace why a decision was made, which alternatives were considered, and what changed later.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used to explain or reason about the foundational concepts of context engineering: what context is, the anatomy of a context window, how attention mechanics work, the U-shaped attention curve, why context quality matters more than quantity, and the mental models needed to interpret every other context-engineering decision. Use this for conceptual explanation, onboarding, and background reading. Route operational work to the specialized skills: debugging attention failures goes to context-degradation, token-efficiency work goes to context-optimization, conversation summarization goes to context-compression, and project-shape decisions go to project-development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture conversations and decisions into structured Notion pages; use when turning chats/notes into wiki entries, how-tos, decisions, or FAQs with proper linking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walk the user through design or implementation decisions one at a time, or review completed code one change at a time. Use when the user says "walk me through each decision", "let's decide together", "help me work through these choices", "walk me through what you did", or "QA step by step". Present concise context, mutually exclusive options, log each answer, and finish with a summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。