1,227 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Answer "what did we say, decide, or promise" from Circleback meetings — search by attendee, company, tag, or date before keyword, read the notes before the transcript, and cite the meeting behind every claim. Use when the user asks what happened on a call, what a customer or teammate said, what was agreed, or refers to a meeting, sync, demo, or interview.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding validation, or full repository scans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Codex is already in the finding-discovery phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to discover candidate security findings in a repository or code change. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Codex is already in the validation phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to determine whether one or more candidate security findings are valid. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check the full candidate diff, affected consumers, focused tests, evidence identities, and verification gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full-text search across all of the user's GitHub repos (including private ones) using a local mirror and ripgrep. Use for "where did I put X", "which repo has X", or any search spanning the user's repos - gh search code / the REST API cannot reliably search private repos.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use git heatmap analysis to identify high-churn files and lines as candidates for thorough review or bug hunting. Works for PR reviews, security audits, bug hunts, or any code analysis task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Log a client communication — call, email, text, letter, in-person, voicemail. Append-only per-case record with dated entries, direction, medium, summary, action items. Works alongside /client-letter and /status client. Use when logging a call or client email, reviewing a communication log, or asking "what did we tell [client] last time".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Show contracts with cancel-by deadlines coming up and warn before notice windows close, working from a maintained renewal register. Use when the user asks "what's renewing soon", "what renewals are due", "did we miss a cancellation window", "add this to the renewal tracker", or on a scheduled basis. Receives handoffs from saas-msa-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review vendor AI terms — agreement, addendum, or ToS AI provisions — against your governance positions; flag training-on-data, liability, model changes, and AI policy consistency. Use when user says "review this AI agreement", "check OpenAI terms", "what did we agree to with [vendor]", "vendor sent an AI addendum", "is this AI contract okay", or attaches vendor AI terms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Safely update Excel workbooks by first locating candidate files, verifying workbook structure before editing, and running post-write validation against required sheets, populated columns, and sample counts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate candidate fixes for verified security findings. Consumes TRIAGE.json (preferred), VULN-FINDINGS.json, INCIDENTS.json, or a vuln-pipeline results directory. Pipeline input is delegated to the execution-verified `vuln-pipeline patch` ladder; static-analysis input gets a per-finding patch subagent + independent reviewer and is written as inert diffs for human review. Writes PATCHES/bug_NN/{patch.diff,patch_result.json}, PATCHES.md, and PATCHES.json. Use when asked to "fix the findings", "patch these vulns", "generate fixes", or "close the loop on triage".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs graph-assisted triage of a single security finding, SARIF result, weAudit annotation, suspicious function, or report excerpt using Trailmark reachability, entrypoint paths, taint, privilege-boundary, blast-radius, caller/callee, and neighborhood evidence. Use when deciding whether one candidate issue is reachable, prioritizing a finding before PoC work, preparing evidence for exploit validation, or checking whether a static-analysis result is actionable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunts for the other instances of a bug already found — the variants of one root cause across a codebase. Use immediately after a vulnerability, logic bug, or bad pattern turns up in a specific file and the question becomes where else it occurs, including the bare conversational form ("are there others like this?", "is this the same bug?"). Also for generalizing one known instance into a CodeQL or Semgrep query for its whole pattern family, and for triaging a set of look-alike candidates against a known root cause. Not for initial discovery with no bug in hand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interprets Culture Index (CI) surveys, behavioral profiles, and personality assessment data. Supports individual profile interpretation, team composition analysis (gas/brake/glue), burnout detection, profile comparison, hiring profiles, manager coaching, interview transcript analysis for trait prediction, candidate debrief, onboarding planning, and conflict mediation. Accepts extracted JSON or PDF input via OpenCV extraction script. Use when the user shares a Culture Index PDF or JSON profile, asks what someone's CI traits mean, compares Culture Index profiles across a team or against a hiring profile, or asks about burnout risk from Survey-versus-Job gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research a game, engine or modding technique on the open web with archive-aware, rate-limit-safe searches — Wayback Machine/archive.today for dead forums (XeNTaX, Zenhax, old threads), GitHub code/repo search, Nexus/Steam Workshop/Thunderstore APIs, Reddit JSON, YouTube transcripts, plus archive snapshots as evidence. Use when starting work on a game ("how did people mod X before?"), when a documented tool/link is dead, when forum threads are login-gated (semi-auto handoff to the human), and before writing a field note so claims carry source URLs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help engineers evaluate a local skill or plugin, explain why it scored that way, show what to fix first, measure real token usage, benchmark starter scenarios, or decide what to run next. Use when the user says things like "evaluate this skill", "give me an analysis of the game dev skill", "why did this score that way", "what should I fix first", "measure the real token usage of this skill", or "what should I run next?".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when triaging public-equity idea candidates. Do not use for final trade recommendations, pitches, memos, or models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a local Codex skill in engineer-friendly terms. Use when the user says "evaluate this skill", "give me an analysis of the game dev skill", "audit this skill", "why did this score that way", "what should I fix first", or asks for a skill-specific report before benchmarking it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for NVIDIA-related requests where an NVIDIA skill might help, even if the user did not ask for a skill. Trigger on NVIDIA products, hardware, software, SDKs, GPUs, Jetson/JetPack/L4T/BSP/SDK Manager/driver/flashing/setup, CUDA, NIM, NeMo, Omniverse/OpenUSD/SimReady, RAPIDS/cuDF, cuPyNumeric, cuOpt, Dynamo, Holoscan, TensorRT, DeepStream, VSS, TAO, NGC/NVCF. Do not use for generic non-NVIDIA route, optimize, deploy, AI, video, data, or infrastructure tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a local Codex plugin in engineer-friendly language. Use when the user says "evaluate this plugin", "audit this plugin", "why did this score that way", "what should I fix first", "help me benchmark this plugin", or asks for a plugin-wide report before comparing versions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map GWAS loci to ranked candidate genes using a deterministic multi-skill chain (EFO -> GWAS -> coordinates -> Open Targets L2G/coloc -> eQTL -> burden/coding context), with reproducible tables and optional figures. Use when a user provides a trait/EFO term and/or lead variants and needs locus-to-gene prioritization for downstream biology decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding validation, or full repository scans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Codex is already in the finding-discovery phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to discover candidate security findings in a repository or code change. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。