Use study limitations drafter for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,197 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use study limitations drafter for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates a first draft of a clinical meta-analysis paper. Input the research report (including Methods and Results sections), language, and title to automatically generate a complete paper draft including Abstract, Introduction, Discussion, and other sections, with automatic ...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft IACUC protocol applications with focus on the 3Rs principles justification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting patient discharge summaries, creating personalized discharge instructions, simulating post-discharge outcomes, reducing hospital readmissions, or optimizing care transitions. Generates AI-enhanced discharge documentation with digital twin predictions for improved patient safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion statements for academic applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes Specific Aims pages for grant applications. Use when drafting or revising the Specific Aims page (NIH R01/R21/R03), NSF Project Summary, or equivalent for any major funding agency. Also triggers on "write my specific aims", "help me draft specific aims for NIH", "what should a specific aims page include", "NSF project summary", "write my grant aims", or "how do I structure an R01".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify whether a proposed XQUIC bug issue is real by checking the cited RFC or Internet-Draft mechanism against the repository's actual source behavior, tracing any root cause to current file and line evidence, and returning a fail-closed boolean gate. Use when validating an issue draft, investigating a claimed QUIC, HTTP/3, QPACK, or MoQT protocol violation, or before issue-submit may publish an issue.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fail closed on published draft XQUIC code pull requests before ready-for-review state. Use when asked to pre-review a code PR or move it out of draft; verify current base-to-head code, protocol conformance, validation coverage, adversarial bad cases, hot-path performance, and memory safety in a five-part local report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Format, create, and update concise XQUIC pull request bodies and review-state transitions. Use when asked to prepare or edit an alibaba/xquic PR body, create a draft PR from an already-pushed branch, update a PR after code changes pushed a new head, or move a validated draft toward review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft and submit evidence-backed XQUIC GitHub bug issues in the repository's CONTRIBUTING and issue-template format. Use when preparing or opening an alibaba/xquic issue that must identify an exact RFC or draft mechanism, expected-versus-actual behavior, reproduction evidence, and optional verified source root cause; requires issue-check to return true before any GitHub submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
creates draft task file in .specs/tasks/draft/ with original user intent
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a structured preregistration document (OSF, AsPredicted, or AEA RCT Registry style) from a research spec or free-form study description. Output is a Markdown file with hypotheses, design, sampling plan, analysis plan, exclusions, and inference criteria — annotated with MUST / SHOULD / MAY clarity flags. Use when user says "preregister", "draft a preregistration", "OSF preregistration", "AsPredicted", "AEA RCT registry", "PAP", "preanalysis plan", or before launching an experiment / data collection / analysis on data the analyst has not yet seen. NOT a registry submission tool — produces a document the user uploads to OSF / AsPredicted / AEA themselves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold a research grant proposal (NSF, NIH, ERC, or foundation) by composing existing primitives — pulls identification strategy from an `/interview-me` spec, delegates the data-management plan to `/data-management-plan` and the facilities statement to `/capture-environment`, and emits a funder-requirements checklist. Use when user says "draft a grant", "write a proposal", "NSF proposal", "NIH aims", "ERC application", "foundation grant", "specific aims", or "scaffold a grant proposal". NOT a submission tool — produces a draft the user uploads to the sponsor's portal themselves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a funder-compliant Data Management Plan (NSF DMP, NIH DMS Policy 2023, ERC, Horizon Europe) by composing the confidential-data and environment-capture primitives. Sections cover data description, formats/metadata, storage/backup, access/sharing, preservation/archiving, and roles. Use when user says "data management plan", "DMP", "DMSP", "NIH data sharing plan", "write the data plan for my grant", or when a grant proposal needs a data-management section. NOT a submission tool — produces a draft the user pastes into the funder portal (DMPTool, NIH ASSIST, Horizon Europe portal).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project orchestrator for the screenwriting skill set (剧本项目主线调度 / 状态存档 / story bible) — a meta-skill that adds no new craft knowledge but routes a screenplay or stage-play project through stages (premise → structure → character → scenes → draft → revision → submission) and a TV / streaming series project (电视剧 / 剧集 / pilot / 一季) through a separate series stage table (engine → character network & season arc → documents/bible → pilot structure → break story & outline → draft → submission), names which sw-* skill to invoke at each stage, defines each stage's deliverable and advisory exit check, and keeps all project state in a story-bible.md file so work can resume across sessions. Use when starting a new script project, resuming one ("continue my screenplay", "where were we"), when the user asks "what should I do next" on a script, when converting a vague idea into a full development pipeline, or when the other sw-* skills are firing individually and the overall process needs sequencing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture a user's real writing voice from 5-20 prior samples, store a local voice.yaml fingerprint, and enforce it on newsjack drafts so AI tells disappear. Measures voice with named stylometry lenses (Burrows's Delta function-word vector, MATTR lexical diversity, sentence-length burstiness, Biber Dimension-1 register, opener-POS profile, punctuation rates) and gates drafts against the fingerprint as bands, not vibes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage inbound journalist source queries and draft a response only when the user's expertise is a real fit. Runs each query through proven source-request lenses (4-gate fit triage, credential-standing test, deadline read, BLUF/inverted-pyramid drafting), kills weak fits, asks for missing proof, and never auto-sends.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a defensible construction change order with entitlement basis, scope delta, itemised pricing, and schedule impact. Use when asked to write a change order, price extra work, draft a CO or COR/PCO, respond to a directive for changed work, or paper a field change. Produces a complete change order request with contract-clause entitlement, labour/material/equipment/OH&P breakdown, time impact statement, and reservation of rights.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Get a bank fee waived or refunded — overdraft, late, maintenance, ATM, or foreign-transaction — with the ask written and the leverage that works. Use when asked to get a bank fee refunded, waive my overdraft fee, the bank charged me a fee, or how to get charges reversed. Produces a read on which fees are commonly reversible, the script to request a refund (in person, chat, or call), the loyalty/first-time/error leverage to use, and how to prevent the fee recurring — plus when to escalate or switch banks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce and continuously maintain ONE living review document for a multi-item session — a cockpit header (Progress checklist, Working folder, Context) plus per-item review cards that you approve or request changes on directly in the doc or side panel. Use whenever a session has multiple deliverables you need to review/approve (meeting-processing + planning, multi-ticket work, briefs with several drafts, any "do X, then plan/draft Y and Z"). The doc is the interaction surface: you edit it (or reply in chat) to approve/change; the agent keeps it live as work progresses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measure your own writing corpus for the words and sentence shapes you over-use, so an agent writing in your voice stops amplifying your tics into a style. Produces a counted baseline file and checks any new draft against it. Use when an agent's drafts start sounding like a caricature of you, before publishing anything written in your voice, or every ten new pieces to re-measure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Edit drafts into sharper, more human writing while preserving the writer's personal voice, or detect AI-slop patterns without rewriting. Use when the user wants a draft clearer, more direct, more opinionated, or less AI-sounding, or asks whether writing reads as AI. Also the default writing standard for all agent output: 80% ASD-STE100 controlled language plus the format ladder (prose, diagram, HTML page, explainer video).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Edit drafts into sharper, more human writing while preserving the writer's personal voice, or detect AI-slop patterns without rewriting. Use when the user wants a draft clearer, more direct, more opinionated, or less AI-sounding, or asks whether writing reads as AI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting the response to an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) R&R after the manuscript has been revised — structuring the response letter and handling reviewer/editor comments. Drafts the response; it does not perform the underlying revisions (do those first).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。