「findings」の検索結果

Analyze Chrome, Chromium, Electron, React DevTools, or Perfetto-compatible JSON traces and audit user-reported profiling findings without loading large artifacts into context; prove trigger-to-render/layout chains, separate measured facts from source inference, find exact code choke points, classify forced layout and render fanout, implement semantically safe fixes, and verify behavior plus repository budgets. Use for trace files, reported profiling durations or call chains, dropped frames, long tasks, resize or scroll jank, render storms, layout thrashing, selector hot paths, interaction latency, or requests to locate exact source-level bottlenecks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements Manus-style file-based planning for complex tasks. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md. Use when starting complex multi-step tasks, research projects, or any task requiring >5 tool calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform multi-round web research on a topic, synthesize the findings, and file structured results into the Obsidian wiki. Use for comprehensive web-sourced research intended to become wiki knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline configuration for Golang projects — workflow files for test, lint, SAST, coverage and vulnerability-scan jobs, Dependabot and Renovate config files, GoReleaser release pipelines, Docker build/push, repository security settings, and AI-driven PR review. Use when setting up or improving Go project CI, writing or fixing `.github/workflows/*.yml`, adding a linter or security scanner as a pipeline job, wiring automated dependency-update bots, or adding quality gates. Covers wiring tools into a pipeline, not the analysis they perform: do NOT use for choosing or interpreting security findings (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-security` skill) or for choosing, upgrading, or auditing dependency versions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-management` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review oh-my-hermes pull requests that have not been reviewed at their current head commit. Run manually to sweep the open backlog, or pass a number to review one PR. Applies the repository's REVIEW.md policy and posts findings as a GitHub review with inline comments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns an answer into a one-page visual HTML explainer: the model writes a short Markdown draft and the bundled CLI builds one page. Use it proactively and liberally, without being asked, whenever a page would help the reader more than plain text, even if plain text would also work: any explanation of how something works or how parts relate (flow, request path, architecture, code or folder structure, state machine, lifecycle, history); any comparison, trade-off or decision with pros and cons; any diagnosis, review or investigation, especially with several causes or findings to rank; any answer with a table, a numbered or ranked list, steps, branches or several sections; or when the user says "I don't get it / draw it / explain visually / 讲讲原理 / 没看懂 / 画个图". When in doubt, use it: a page is quick and cheap to make. Also for explainer videos ("make a video", "做个视频") and for changing its settings. Skip only for small talk, a trivial one-line answer, or when the user asks for plain text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitors task execution for skill improvement opportunities. Use during ANY multi-step task, agentic workflow, or work session. Captures patterns, user corrections and methodology worth preserving as reusable skills. It writes observation files to the workspace. Also triggers in post-task feedback discussions and when the user mentions skill observations, the observation log, or skill taxonomy. Also known as "One Skill to Rule Them All" — trigger on this phrase too. IMPORTANT: invoke this skill before the FIRST tool call of any session and before writing or proposing a plan — any turn that will involve a tool call counts. This sentence is the session-start trigger and the only activation layer that survives an unreachable config file; pair it with a CLAUDE.md instruction or a harness session-start hook (references/environments.md) — description matching alone is not enforceable. A subagent dispatched by a session already running it does not run it: it writes nothing and puts its findings in its report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review skills in any project using a dual-axis method: (1) deterministic code-based checks (structure, scripts, tests, execution safety) and (2) LLM deep review findings. Use when you need reproducible quality scoring for `skills/*/SKILL.md`, want to gate merges with a score threshold (for example 90+), or need concrete improvement items for low-scoring skills. Works across projects via --project-root.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes documents and processes against FINRA, SEC, Federal Reserve, and CFPB regulatory frameworks. Identifies compliance gaps, classifies findings by severity, and recommends remediation. Use when performing compliance audits, regulatory reviews, gap analyses, or verifying policy adherence to financial regulations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches a topic by breaking it into subtopics, gathering factual information with reasoning, and producing a structured summary with key findings and open questions. Use when the user asks to research, investigate, look up, summarize a topic, or says 'what is known about...' or 'learn about...'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "remember project context", review saved findings, initialize runtime memory, archive stale work, reconcile notes, or erase a subject; manages authorized HOT/WARM/COLD working memory across all disciplines while preserving registry event ownership and privacy controls. Not for changing canonical registry facts - route those through the owning registry. 项目记忆/跨会话

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an expert review against Nielsen's heuristics and domain criteria, with severity ratings. Use when you need findings without recruiting participants. For a facilitated team feedback session, use `design-critique` (design-ops).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a repository that makes findings findable, reusable, and cumulative across teams. Use when the same research keeps getting redone. For synthesising one study, use `affinity-diagram`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit an existing interface against WCAG, producing findings with severity ratings and remediation steps. Use when you have a design or build to assess now. Not for planning future sessions with assistive-technology users — use `accessibility-test-plan` (prototyping-testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconcile what the numbers say with what users say, and design the study that settles it rather than restates it. Use when behavioural data and research findings point different ways. For reading the data on its own, use `behavioural-analytics`; for synthesising interviews on their own, use `affinity-diagram`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate the AWS DevOps Agent across multiple AgentSpaces from one Claude Code session — route questions to the right space (prod vs staging vs knowledge), query several spaces in parallel and synthesize, or compare findings across accounts. Use whenever the user has more than one AgentSpace configured, mentions multiple AWS accounts, or asks something like "check both prod and staging", "compare across accounts", or "ask the knowledge space".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS security service suitability, coverage and cost recommendations: WAF/origin overlap, AWS Network Firewall inspection coverage and policy review, VPC endpoint, Transit Gateway/Cloud WAN segmentation and DNS Firewall security-control suitability, certificate renewal ownership and monitoring, incident response triage ownership, centralized security log store (CloudWatch or Security Lake). Also factual configuration, findings, data sources and severity scoring for GuardDuty, Inspector, Security Hub V2/OCSF (Exposure, connectors, automation), Security Hub CSPM/ASFF (standards, controls), Macie, Detective, Security Lake, AWS Security Incident Response membership and case coverage, and Organizations security policies. Applies to advisory security-service choices even when one service is named. Implementation, rule or code authoring, deployment, scans and troubleshooting outside these factual procedures belong to specialist skills. Supports local AWS CLI and AWS MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a Node.js project's installed npm dependency tree for known CVEs by wrapping the npm audit JSON output and emitting findings in the canonical penetration-tester schema. Detects direct AND transitive vulnerabilities, normalizes npm's severity scale (info/low/moderate/ high/critical) to the shared Severity enum, and parses both v1 and v2 audit output formats so the skill works against npm 6 and npm 7+ lockfiles. Use when: pre-merge gate on a Node project, post-incident sweep after a transitive package compromise (e.g. event-stream, ua-parser, node-ipc, color.js), SOC2 vendor-management evidence collection, or auditing an inherited or acquired Node codebase. Threshold: any HIGH or CRITICAL CVE in the resolved dependency tree. MODERATE / LOW reported informationally. Trigger with: "audit npm deps", "npm vulnerability scan", "check node packages for CVEs", "npm audit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a Python project's installed dependencies for known CVEs by wrapping pip-audit (PyPA's official vulnerability auditor) and emitting findings in the canonical penetration-tester schema. Detects vulnerable direct AND transitive packages, normalizes pip-audit's severity output via OSV severity bands, falls back to pip list --outdated when pip-audit isn't installed, and supports requirements.txt, pyproject.toml (PEP 621), Pipfile.lock, and poetry.lock as input sources. Use when: pre-merge gate on a Python project, post-incident sweep after a PyPI compromise (e.g. ctx, request-toolbelt typosquats, ultralytics 8.3.42 compromise), SOC2 evidence collection, or inheriting an unfamiliar Python codebase. Threshold: any HIGH or CRITICAL CVE in the resolved dependency tree. MODERATE / LOW reported informationally. Trigger with: "audit python deps", "pip vulnerability scan", "check pypi packages for CVEs", "pip-audit run".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns one-shot external recon into a continuous monitoring program. Covers the scheduled re-scan-and-diff loop (baseline snapshot -> interval sleep -> re-scan -> asset/finding delta -> threshold-gated webhook alert), the scan-to-scan diff engine (new/removed/changed assets by a tracked-attribute table, new/resolved findings by a stable cross-scan fingerprint), adversary CTI / chatter monitoring across six public feeds (ransomwatch, ransomware.live, HackerNews Algolia search, Reddit security-subreddit RSS, GitHub Gist code-search, public Telegram channel scraping) with a source-kind-aware severity engine (leak-site/forum/telegram/paste tiers, CRITICAL through INFO), literal/glob/regex watchlist pattern matching, full-corpus capture with retroactive rescan on new watchlist entries, infrastructure-tracking-over-time discipline (certificate-transparency, passive-DNS, port/service, and typosquat re-enumeration cadence, and what a genuine 'perimeter drift' event looks like in the diff output), a five-state finding-lifecycle state machine (open/triaged/risk_accepted/resolved/false_positive) with per-severity SLA and fingerprint-based cross-scan dedup and auto-resolve/reopen rules, the alert-fatigue trap where a lifecycle-unaware rule re-fires on an already-accepted finding, a durable retry/backoff alert-outbox pattern ('queued is not delivered'), and copy-paste bash-cron plus PowerShell-Scheduled-Task recipes for a re-scan+diff loop with the Slack-compatible webhook payload shape. Passive OSINT and analysis only -- no new active-intrusion technique. Use when setting up ongoing monitoring for a retainer or MSSP engagement, tuning alert thresholds to avoid fatigue, triaging a finding's lifecycle status, investigating adversary chatter about a brand, building a 'what changed on the perimeter since last week' report, or deciding whether a persisting finding should re-alert.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end external OSINT engagement autopilot. Run the FULL osint-methodology pipeline to completion in ONE go for an authorized domain — engagement folder, Stages 1-5 (seed, expansion, enrichment, exposure, convergence), multi-agent per-host content+JS fan-out, headline verification, auto-generated findings, and a consolidated multi-tab .xlsx deliverable. Stops ONLY for Stage 6 (active exploitation) arming and out-of-scope sibling assets. Use whenever asked to "run OSINT / recon / attack-surface" on a target — do NOT deliver a thin passive first pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms research findings into executive-ready briefings. Automatically activated when user mentions 'executive', 'briefing', 'C-suite', 'board', 'leadership', or 'presentation'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Formulate evidence-bounded scientific questions, candidate hypotheses, rival explanations, causal or associational claims, discriminating predictions, measurements, and preregistration-ready analysis plans. Use when turning observations or preliminary findings into transparent, testable research plans without treating hypotheses as facts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。