928 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Systematic copy editing through focused passes (the Seven Sweeps Framework) covering clarity, voice, proof, specificity, and friction removal. Use when editing marketing copy, reviewing drafts, polishing content, or proofreading.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, inspect, and safely update project-scoped ReachAI Agents; edit and publish Supervisor config drafts; discover published bindable Skills; and attach or detach exact Skill versions through the Agent AI Coding REST API. Use when an AI coding tool is asked to add an Agent, configure its model or prompt, bind a Skill, remove a Skill binding, or attach a published Workflow as a Tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Edit, validate, debug, publish, and inspect ReachAI Workflow drafts through the Workflow AI Coding REST API. Use when asked to create or modify a workflow graph, add/update/delete nodes or edges, validate GraphSpec, dry-run or debug-run a workflow, inspect trace/run output, check release readiness, publish a validated draft, or work on PAGE_ASSISTANT workflows from Cursor/Codex.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rate market weather by script: economy, competition, platform and regulatory shifts, scored. "is now a good time to launch"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lock one primary goal per brand and judge ideas or drafts against it. "does this fit our goal"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repurpose one content piece into 10+ channel formats with drafts and a calendar. "repurpose this blog post"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes a settlement letter on the right footing — and warns you when marking it 'without prejudice' won't actually keep it out of court. A genuine settlement letter is normally protected (the judge can't see it), but only if the substance is a real attempt to settle, and even then there are exceptions. The skill picks the correct footing — without prejudice (WP), without prejudice save as to costs (WPSATC / Calderbank), or open — drafts the finished letter, and surfaces the Unilever v Procter & Gamble exceptions that get WP material admitted despite the label, which a plain template won't flag. Built for juniors and in-house counsel drafting a settlement or Calderbank offer who need the footing right the first time. Use when the user asks to draft a WP letter, a Calderbank, a settlement letter, or wants to know whether material is likely protected from disclosure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts a customized Customer Agreement starting from the Y Combinator standard form SaaS template. Tailors the agreement through structured intake questions covering fee structure, data handling, ML rights, implementation services, and more. Applies 18 always-on defaults that transform the raw YC form into a professional starting point (renamed to "Customer Agreement", data privacy section added, warranty restructured, consolidated SLA/support exhibit, etc.). Produces a clean .docx and a lawyer-facing memo explaining every change from the YC standard. Use when user says "draft a SaaS agreement", "YC SaaS", "startup SaaS contract", "customer agreement", "SaaS subscription agreement", or "I need a SaaS agreement starting from the YC form". Also trigger when the user is a startup founder discussing SaaS contracting, even if they don't mention YC specifically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
No Inference / Source-Locked Verification. Forces Claude to answer ONLY from user-provided materials and/or online sources actually accessed — no inference, no assumptions, no gap-filling. Every factual, legal, numerical, or procedural claim must be anchored to a cited source. Use whenever Claude reviews documents, summarises evidence, checks accuracy, drafts submissions, creates timelines, extracts facts, checks citations, analyses rules, prepares legal arguments, compares documents, verifies claims, produces chronologies, works from uploaded materials, performs legal research, checks case status, or does anything where evidential fidelity matters. Also trigger on: 'source-locked', 'no inference', 'only from the materials', 'don't assume', 'stick to the evidence', 'verify this', 'check this is right', 'work from the documents'. Overrides Claude's default tendency to fill gaps. If evidential accuracy matters, use this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A zero-hallucination privacy-policy generator that takes anyone — non-lawyer founder to lawyer — from a guided intake to a publishable, jurisdiction-aware privacy policy. Jurisdiction-first: it detects which laws apply from where your users are, then drafts only the required clauses — GDPR/EU + UK, US (CCPA/CPRA, ~20 state laws, COPPA, sector overlays), and global/MENA (LGPD, Quebec Law 25, India DPDP, China PIPL, UAE/DIFC, Saudi PDPL), plus app-store, cookies, and AI/EU AI Act disclosures. Its rule: state only what you confirm; never invent a statute, citation, fine, or date — every claim is source-cited and QA-gated. Not legal advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare a lawyer for an adversarial proceeding the way Neal Katyal's "Harvey" prepared him for the SCOTUS tariffs argument: profile the tribunal from their prior opinions and questions, predict the specific questions you will face, map narrow "escape routes" each judge can walk through without abandoning prior commitments, and spar adversarially until only the strongest answers survive. The model is the sparring partner. The human still wins the case. Use when: preparing for oral argument, appellate argument, motion hearing, evidentiary hearing, deposition (taking or defending), arbitration, mediation, or any proceeding where a known decision-maker will fire questions at you in real time. Also useful for stress-testing a brief before filing. Proactively suggest when: the user mentions an upcoming hearing/argument with named judges or arbitrators, drafts a brief and wants it pressure-tested, asks "what will Justice X / Judge Y ask me," or talks about preparing for a specific bench.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Practitioner skill for advising on EU Regulation 2023/2854 (Data Act). Covers Chapters II-VII (IoT data access, mandatory B2B sharing, unfair contract terms, public-sector exceptional need, cloud switching, third-country governmental access) and Chapter VIII (interoperability and smart contracts, gate-only). Use when the user asks about Data Act rights or obligations, drafts a Data Act notice or letter, reviews a data-sharing or cloud-switching contract under the Data Act, runs a Data Act gap analysis, or asks how the Data Act interacts with GDPR, the DMA, the Trade Secrets Directive, or sectoral law. Triggers include "Data Act", "Datengesetz", "Regulation (EU) 2023/2854", "Art. 4(1) request", "Art. 5(1) third-party request", "trade-secret handbrake", "cloud switching obligations", "Chapter VI", "Ch V exceptional need", and references to specific Data Act articles or recitals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A drafting-and-review copilot for a founders' / co-founders' agreement — the terms fixing equity, vesting, IP, roles, control, deadlock, and departure between cofounders. Jurisdiction-agnostic, anchored on the Delaware C-corp default. Two modes: DRAFT (intake → equity & vesting → clauses → blocker triage → pre-signature check) and REVIEW (audit an existing agreement against an 18-clause checklist and red-flag scan). It handles the highest-dispute terms first-class: the equity split as documented reasoning (not a fake calculator), reverse vesting and the 83(b) clock, present-tense IP assignment (the Stanford v. Roche trap), leaver buyback and dead equity, and the deadlock clause most tools omit. It drafts for the venture, never one founder against another. Not legal advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI co-counsel for divorce and family-law attorneys — a jurisdiction-portable scaffold spanning the full matter lifecycle. Eight operating modes mirror how a matter actually moves: intake and onboarding, financial disclosure, children and support, property division and QDRO, discovery and document review, drafting, negotiation and mediation prep, and court prep — plus post-judgment modification and enforcement. The methodology is jurisdiction-agnostic: it forces real, verifiable research for every local form, formula, or rule rather than inventing one, handling common-law, community-property, civil-law, and MENA personal-status regimes as variables. Built around one non-negotiable: privilege. It drafts, analyzes, organizes, and pressure-tests. It is not the lawyer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When your bar comes asking "show me how you billed AI-assisted work" — and ABA 512, Florida 24-1, California, New York, and DC all have opinions out — you need an artifact that survives review. billable-time produces it. From your Claude Code session logs, it drafts reviewable time entries plus a printable HTML audit packet with: SHA-256 chain of evidence (source files + matter.yml + active disclosure pack + verifiable artifact self-hash), attorney identity and signature block, a bar-opinion disclosure pack with starter language for five jurisdictions, and content-aware deterministic narratives derived from filename and tool shape — never from prompt text by default. The tool refuses to bill on its own. --strict mode refuses to ship the artifact if any audit invariant fails (broad routes, missing attorney, missing/unverified disclosure). Comes as a Node CLI and a self-contained browser version (no backend; JSONL never leaves the page). 15 invariant tests verify the contract. AGPL-3.0.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Works out which documents you have to hand over to the other side in a civil case in England & Wales, and builds the formal list. The part it gets right that trips people up is which disclosure regime applies — Practice Direction 57AD (the Disclosure Pilot, now permanent in the Business and Property Courts, with its Models A–E) or standard disclosure under CPR Part 31 everywhere else. It picks the regime, chooses a Model per issue, structures the Disclosure Review Document, and drafts the disclosure certificate for the party to sign personally. Built for litigation juniors, in-house counsel, and small teams without a precedent bank. Use when the user says 'disclosure list', 'PD 57AD', 'Model C', 'extended disclosure', 'List of Documents', 'N265', or needs to work out what must be disclosed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Approval cascade definition and tracking for multi-stakeholder document workflows. Internal review sequences, client approval workflows, regulatory review, overdue chasing with escalation logic, version control coordination, and cross-jurisdiction document dependencies. Use when defining who reviews a document and in what order, tracking where a document is stuck in the approval chain, chasing an overdue reviewer, preventing reviewers working on superseded drafts, or mapping dependencies between documents across jurisdictions. Trigger on: 'who needs to approve this', 'document approval', 'review sequence', 'stuck in review', 'overdue approval', 'who has the document', 'version control', 'wrong version', 'document dependency', 'NL SPA waiting on German opinion', 'approval cascade', 'review chain', 'document circulation', 'chasing the partner', 'client approval process', 'where is the document'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Give feature/pricing cards a premium feel: a soft radial spotlight follows the cursor across the card and lifts its border. Keep the glow subtle and low-contrast. Falls back to a plain static border under prefers-reduced-motion and on touch. Do not use on text-dense reading surfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Give one short headline quiet premium emphasis: a slow on-brand gradient drifts through the type. One phrase per view; never body copy (readability). Pure CSS; falls back to a solid brand color under prefers-reduced-motion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lift a clickable card toward the viewer on hover with a deepening shadow — a tactile, responsive cue. Pure CSS, no JS. Only use on actually-clickable cards (motion implies clickability). Honors prefers-reduced-motion (static). Avoid on very dense grids where many lifts feel noisy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When you paste raw human input — a call transcript (Grain, Zoom, Granola, Fathom), a text or email from a client/partner/friend, a voice-memo dump, or meeting notes — and want it converted into structured work. Extracts decisions, action items (yours vs theirs), bugs/feature requests, and facts worth keeping; files GitHub issues in the right repo, captures to the second-brain vault, and drafts (never sends) the reply. Triggers on "/ingest", "ingest this", "here's my call with X," "here's the transcript," "this is from [person]," "[person] asked me this," "from [person]:", a pasted transcript with speaker labels, or a forwarded client message that clearly expects processing. Person→project routing lives in a private config; unknown senders get asked about once, then remembered.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gary Vaynerchuk's jab-jab-jab-right-hook framework applied to a personal portfolio rotation on X and LinkedIn. Jabs = build-in-public + educational (value). Hooks = promo (the ask). Each property in the user's configured portfolio (see `~/.config/makerskills/jab-hook/properties.yaml`) gets a hook at least once every ~3 weeks; jabs fill the rest. Drafts go into the user's Typefully workspace via MCP. Modes — plan (7-day plan), pick-next (single post), audit (coverage report), draft (specific post). Triggers on "/jab-hook," "what should I post," "plan my socials," "next promo," "next jab," "next hook," "social rotation," "promote [property]," "BIP post," "audit my socials," "what haven't I posted about."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-earnings quarterly update reports for A-share companies under coverage. Analyzes 业绩快报/正式财报, generates variance tables (actual vs 一致预期 vs prior), flags key drivers, and drafts structured earnings notes in Chinese sell-side format. Use instead of the original earnings-analysis skill for Chinese equities. Triggers on "A股财报分析", "季度业绩点评", "年报/中报点评", "earnings review", or "[company] earnings".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn drafted legal docs (privacy policy, terms) into hosted pages and set the App Store Connect Privacy Policy / Support / Marketing URLs via the ASC REST API. Use at Phase 6 / submission, after legal drafts exist. The App Privacy "nutrition label" stays manual (Apple exposes no API) — this prints the exact answers to click.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。