「integrity」の検索結果

Expert knowledge of academic writing standards for peer-reviewed papers, including citation integrity, style compliance, clarity, and scientific writing best practices. Use when reviewing or editing academic manuscripts, papers, or research documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[62] VALIDATE. Final self-check before delivery. Verify goal alignment, completeness, correctness, and identify residual risks. Produces quality score (0-100) and delivery status. Use when completing any significant work, before handoff, or when you need confidence that work is ready.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[70] CLOSE. Manage task lifecycle with correct statuses and no duplicates. Ensure each task has one status, artifacts match claims, and no task appears in multiple places. Use when managing task lists, updating progress, or ensuring task tracking integrity across systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master software architect specializing in modern architecture patterns, clean architecture, microservices, event-driven systems, and DDD. Reviews system designs and code changes for architectural integrity, scalability, and maintainability. Use PROACTIVELY for architectural decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect cyber attacks targeting OT historian servers (OSIsoft PI, Ignition, Wonderware) that sit at the IT/OT boundary and serve as pivot points for lateral movement between enterprise and control networks, including data manipulation, unauthorized queries, and exploitation of historian-specific vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and analyze Linux persistence mechanisms including crontab entries, systemd service units, LD_PRELOAD hijacking, bashrc modifications, and authorized_keys backdoors using auditd and file integrity monitoring

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate supply chain attack artifacts including trojanized software updates, compromised build pipelines, and sideloaded dependencies to identify intrusion vectors and scope of compromise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images using dd and dcfldd while preserving evidence integrity through hash verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before a tag, GitHub release, or Zenodo archive, when README, CATALOG, CHANGELOG, CITATION.cff, the disclosure aggregate, and skill discovery must agree, or when a go or no-go release verdict needs recorded evidence behind it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing a course, assessment, or student-feedback workflow and deciding where AI assistance is acceptable, when grading or feedback must stay within academic-integrity and FERPA/KVKK boundaries, or when AI-use rules for students need stating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when coding interviews, focus groups, or open-ended responses with AI assistance, when a codebook needs building or auditing, when intercoder reliability must be computed, or when qualitative quotes need integrity checks before publication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Store, verify, and manage AI data on the Ethereum blockchain (Base network) using the ERCData standard. Use when an agent needs to store data fingerprints on-chain, verify data integrity, create audit trails, manage access control for private data, or interact with the ERCData smart contract. Supports public and private storage, EIP-712 verification, snapshots, and batch operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refute-before-prove research discipline: automated counterexample sweeps before any formalization, meter-integrity audits for information-bound experiments, mutation-tested model checkers, pre-registered commit-or-cut gates for speculative directions, wrong-turn reporting, and numeric-claim provenance. Use when validating any new theorem, bound, equilibrium, or security claim; when building or trusting a checker, simulator, or experiment; or when deciding whether a speculative research direction lives or dies. NOT for exploratory brainstorming, product prioritization, writing style, or literature review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Practical incident-response runbook for a suspected or confirmed ComfyUI / GPU-daemon compromise. Triage, scope, contain, forensic collection, weight-integrity verification, rebuild from clean snapshot, postmortem. NOT for hygiene scans on a healthy box (use supply-chain-defense-for-ml-extensions), and NOT for runtime hardening of a fresh deployment (use gpu-hosted-asset-hardening).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies build output integrity after code changes. Runs builds, validates artifact structure, checks for regressions in bundle size, asset references, and static export completeness. The last line of defense before a bad deploy ships.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。