「literature」の検索結果

Evidence-first academic research workflow for topic ideation, scholarly search, paper reading, literature and systematic reviews, study and experiment design, statistics and data analysis, scientific figures, manuscript drafting and polishing, citation checks, peer review, rebuttals, submission packages, theses, and paper-to-presentation work. Use when an agent must plan, execute, audit, write, revise, or package research while keeping claims traceable to verified sources, data, analysis, or official requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Academic research assistant — literature review + methodology (quant/qual) + paper outline (IMRaD) + citation + research gap analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scientific research engine with adversarial review, tree search, and serendipity detection. Use when: exploring hypotheses, validating findings against literature, running computational experiments with quality gates, or hunting for unexpected discoveries. Do NOT use for simple Q&A, code editing, or non-research tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scientific research engine for hypothesis testing, literature gap analysis, experimental validation, and data-driven discovery. Enforces adversarial review (Reviewer 2), 32 quality gates, tree search over hypotheses, confounder harness for quantitative claims, and serendipity detection. TRIGGER when: user asks to analyze scientific data, test hypotheses, validate findings, search for research gaps, design experiments, or investigate results. DO NOT TRIGGER when: pure code review, documentation writing, devops tasks, general conversation, or non-scientific data transformation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scientific research engine v6.0 NEXUS — adversarial review (Reviewer 2), 32 quality gates, tree search, serendipity tracking, confounder harness, cross-session learning. Use for ANY scientific analysis, hypothesis testing, data validation, literature review, or task where correctness > speed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when users need to search academic papers, download research documents, extract citations, or gather scholarly information. Triggers include: requests to "find papers on", "search research about", "download academic articles", "get citations for", or any request involving academic databases like arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, or Google Scholar. Also use for literature reviews, bibliography generation, and research discovery. Requires OpenClawCLI installation from clawhub.ai.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an academic writing expert specializing in scholarly papers, literature reviews, research methodology, and thesis writing. You must adhere to strict academic standards in all outputs.## Core Requirements1. **Output Format**: Use Markdown exclusively for all writing outputs and always wrap the main content of your response within <ama-doc></ama-doc> tags to clearly distinguish the core i...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dr. Kaia Chen - AI Architect, mentor, and strategic advisor for Marcus. Use when the user says "Kaia", "Dr. Chen", "ask Kaia", "/kaia", or wants architectural advice, trade-off analysis, production readiness guidance, mentorship, a voice of reason, or a second opinion on design decisions. Kaia grounds her advice in the actual codebase (via Chen MCP tools) and research literature, and logs important decisions and insights via Simon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates structured 500-800 word summaries of legal articles distilling thesis, methodology, arguments, authorities, conclusions, and significance. Triggers when summarizing legal scholarship, reviewing law review articles, preparing literature reviews, or triaging articles for full reading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search scientific papers and retrieve structured experimental data extracted from full-text studies via the BGPT MCP server. Returns 25+ fields per paper including methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions. Use for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and finding experimental details not available in abstracts alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search scientific papers via the BGPT MCP server and retrieve structured experimental data — methods, results, conclusions, quality scores, and 25+ metadata fields per paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce comprehensive synthesis with explicit citations from multiple ordinary public-web sources via the Tavily CLI. Use for detailed reports, comparisons, market or literature research, and questions whose answer requires multi-source web evidence rather than a quick lookup. Do not use for simple discovery (tavily-search), one known URL (tavily-extract), one-site URL discovery or bulk extraction (tavily-map/crawl), or research centered on named social, community, career, code, media, authenticated, or cross-platform sources (Agent Reach). Takes 30-120 seconds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieves scientific papers from PubMed and creates plain-language research summaries. Use when users ask about medical research, scientific studies, clinical trials, disease treatments, or want to understand recent scientific literature on any biomedical topic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive AI-powered research with citations via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill when the user wants deep research, a detailed report, a comparison, market analysis, literature review, or says "research", "investigate", "analyze in depth", "compare X vs Y", "what does the market look like for", or needs multi-source synthesis with explicit citations. Returns a structured report grounded in web sources. Takes 30-120 seconds. For quick fact-finding, use tavily-search instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Europe PMC RESTful Web Service 多源文献聚合检索原子 skill。**使用本 skill 进行医学文献广召回 / RAG 知识库构建 / 跨库聚合 / 预印本扫描 / 全文链接发现**。一次调用同时召回 PubMed (MED) + PMC + AGRICOLA + CABI + 预印本(bioRxiv / medRxiv / ChemRxiv / Research Square)+ NCBI Bookshelf + 专利,自动按 PMID/PMCID/DOI 三级去重,返回完整元数据(全文 OA 链接、citations、grants 资助信息)。**定位:广召回 · 多源 · RAG 友好**(与 pubmed-eutils 互补 — 后者做单源精准官方检索 + Clinical Queries;本 skill 做"撒网"式多源聚合)。触发词:Europe PMC / EuropePMC / 多源文献聚合 / 广召回 / RAG 召回 / RAG 知识库 / 预印本搜索 / preprint search / bioRxiv / medRxiv / ChemRxiv / DOI 检索 / DOI lookup / 全文链接 / full-text links / OA 全文 / PMCID / 灰色文献 / grey literature / 跨库去重 / 资助检索 / grant search / NIH funded / Wellcome funded / citations metadata。**不做**:NCBI E-utilities 直检(→ pubmed-eutils)、临床试验注册(→ clinical-trials-v2)、全文 XML 抽取(→ bioc-fulltext-fetch)、实体识别(→ pubtator-entity-search)、证据分级(→ medical-evidence-grading)、参考文献终态写入(→ evidence-appendix-sync)。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-grounded AI research workflow for turning supplied economics, finance, management, and social-science papers or structured records into versioned PaperReading artifacts. Use when Codex must ingest text, Markdown, or a text-based PDF; separate source-grounded claims from researcher analysis; bind findings to evidence IDs and locators; review extraction candidates; migrate v0.2 PaperRecord JSON; validate or verify a v0.3 PaperPackage; generate research extensions; export reviewable JSON or Markdown; or safely update a compatible 13-field literature workbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SOP for locating, auditing, and importing production-tested reference patterns and peer-reviewed literature. Trigger when: - Designing or implementing non-trivial algorithms, system protocols, design patterns, or major library integrations. - Prompt contains: prior art, reference implementation, research patterns, standard implementation, arXiv, RFC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, revise, and validate publication-ready academic paper figures and tables. Use for LaTeX tables, related-work comparison tables, result tables, notation/dataset/taxonomy tables, precise source-data-driven experiment plots from CSV/JSON/logs, generated conceptual figures such as system overviews/pipelines/architectures/threat models, captions, artifact specs, source-data traceability, and paper-ready PDF/SVG/PNG/LaTeX exports. Do not use for prose-only paper writing, self-review, reviewer response, rebuttal drafting, or external literature-management workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating, designing, drafting, revising, stress-testing, or preparing academic articles, empirical research reports, literature reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, journal submissions, reviewer responses, research methods, sampling, measurement, analysis, publication readiness, or citation/source audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get literature into a research run when the plugin fetches nothing — fetch the source yourself with web_fetch / web_search or take a file the person already has, READ it with the pdf_* tools or ocr, then ingest record and text together with rs_cite, bind locators, and cite with [@key]. Use when a run needs sources, when a library export has to come in, when a citation key is unknown, or when a claim cannot be checked against a source.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a research project as a folder on disk — open the run root first, record the user's own instruction verbatim, open the two frame gates and stop for the human to answer them, and keep the stage the ledger says it is. Use when the user asks to start, resume or check a research run, a paper, a review, a brief, a report, a literature review or a protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project-first Research pipeline with live gates, source/PDF evidence, claim boundaries, compute and publication controls; includes an optional PubMed/arXiv standard-library helper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build full-paper Chinese-English side-by-side, figure/table-aware, source-grounded Markdown readers for journal or conference papers from PDF, DOI, arXiv, publisher HTML, or pasted text. Use whenever the user asks to translate or read a paper, make 中英文对照/原文对照/全文翻译解读, extract figures or tables into the right positions, preserve figure/table placement near relevant prose, or keep exact source anchors for every block. This skill must not degrade into a summary-only output unless the user explicitly asks for a summary. Also trigger on general paper-reading and translation requests even without the word "Nature", such as reading/translating an academic paper, literature reading, understanding a paper, and Chinese phrasings like 读论文、精读论文、论文翻译、文献翻译、文献阅读、学术阅读、帮我读这篇文章、翻译这篇paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。