956 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Design Thinking learning curriculum covering nine progressive modules across the full Problem, Solution, and Implementation Space methods plus a shared manufacturing reference scenario for teaching and practice
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fit a retention curve to observed cohort data and project LTV — computed, not estimated. Use when someone has real cohort retention numbers (month 0, 1, 2…) and asks what lifetime value, lifetime periods, or long-run retention they imply, or whether retention is flattening or leaking. Produces a fitted power curve (parameters, R², retention floor), a 24-36 period projection, and a real .xlsx with live formulas where editing ARPU recalculates LTV — via the bundled zero-dependency script.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract and risk-rate hidden assumptions in a product brief or PRD. Use when asked to review a product brief for assumptions, audit a PRD for risks, find hidden assumptions, validate product plans, or run an assumption analysis. Produces a prioritised assumption map with confidence and impact scores, recommended validation methods, and critical assumption flags.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are a member of a Commonly workspace — a shared space where humans and AI agents from any origin collaborate in pods (chat rooms with memory). Use this whenever you are connected to Commonly via the commonly_* MCP tools: to read what's happening, post, remember things across sessions, react, DM other agents, and work the task board. Load it the moment you see any commonly_* tool available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architecture specialist for software/system design, module and service boundaries, tradeoff analysis, and stakeholder synthesis. Uses context-aware methods such as diagnostic routing, design-twice comparison, ATAM-style risk analysis, CBAM-style prioritization, and ADR-style decision records.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning for LLMs using LoRA, QLoRA, and 25+ methods. Use when fine-tuning large models (7B-70B) with limited GPU memory, when you need to train <1% of parameters with minimal accuracy loss, or for multi-adapter serving. HuggingFace's official library integrated with transformers ecosystem.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect SQL injection vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find unsafe SQL construction sites), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers string concat, f-strings, unsafe ORM methods, and dynamic identifiers. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/sqli-results.md. Use when asked to find SQLi or database injection bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when proactively verifying an installed BGS modpack batch before declaring it good. Triggers - "test the pack", "verification", "post-install check", "is it stable", "what should I test", "测试整合包", "验证安装". NOT for reactive crash/performance diagnosis after failure (use diagnosing-bgs-problems), pre-install mod evaluation (evaluating-bgs-mods), or defining batch boundaries/style (curating-bgs-modpack).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding how to correctly download/install a Bethesda mod per the author's instructions — triggers "how do I install", "FOMOD choices", "which file to download", "author说明", "install instructions", "which variant", "按作者说明安装", "这个mod怎么装". NOT for deciding whether to include the mod (use evaluating-bgs-mods), load order editing (writing-bgs-load-order), record conflicts (xedit-conflict-audit), archive operations (using-bgs-archive), Papyrus work (using-bgs-papyrus), or translation/export tasks (using-bgs-translator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adds a new LLM provider implementing LLMProvider interface with call() and stream() methods. Integrates with provider factory in src/llm/index.ts, config detection in src/llm/config.ts, and error handling via tracking and recovery. Use when adding a new model backend, integrating a third-party LLM API, or extending LLM platform support. Do NOT use for fixing bugs in existing providers, modifying existing provider behavior, or changing the LLMProvider interface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defending the research design of an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript — quantitative (multilevel, IRT, quasi-experimental, RCT), qualitative (case study, ethnography, interview), or mixed methods. AERJ judges each tradition on its own terms against the AERA reporting standards. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when articulating why an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) result matters — its relevance for farm design, management, decision support, or policy. AgSy values systems analysis that informs a decision, so this is what separates an AgSy paper from a methods demo. It frames implications honestly within the model's scope; it does not over-claim or invent impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building the theoretical engine for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — mechanisms, process vs. variance logic, constructs, and boundary conditions. Builds the argument; it does not select methods or run analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing and justifying the research design for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative (grounded-theory, ethnographic, historical) or quantitative — and setting the rigor bar. Designs the study; it does not run the analysis (see asq-data-analysis).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when situating an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript within organization-theory conversations and sharpening the gap/tension it addresses. Positions the argument; it does not develop the core theory or write the methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative coding and data-to-theory construction, or quantitative estimation and robustness. Makes the evidence-to-theory link transparent; it does not design the study (see asq-methods).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when analyzing the material of an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — coding and interpreting qualitative field data, estimating experimental and survey models, or running theory-laden archival analyses, with an audit trail appropriate to each tradition. Analyzes and reports; it does not design the study (aos-methods).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing and applying a theory-construction method for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — building constructs, defining their domain, specifying relationships, articulating the underlying logic/mechanisms, and setting boundary conditions. This is the THEORY-CONSTRUCTION craft, NOT empirical method; AMR publishes no datasets, no measures, and no statistical tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building the theoretical engine of an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — choosing a social/organizational theory tradition (institutional theory, governmentality, Bourdieu, actor-network theory, practice theory, psychological process theory) and making it generate the analysis rather than decorate it. Builds the lens; it does not collect data (aos-methods) or frame the contribution (aos-contribution-framing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing the study for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — qualitative field studies (access, case logic, interviews, observation), behavioral experiments, surveys, historical/archival inquiry, or theory-laden archival designs, each with the ethics and site-anonymity groundwork done early. Designs the inquiry; it does not run the coding or estimation (aos-data-analysis).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running and reporting the statistical analysis for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — measurement validity, common-method bias, the right estimator (HLM, SEM, panel, experiments), endogeneity, and robustness. Executes and reports the analysis; it does not design the study (amj-methods) or frame the contribution (amj-contribution-framing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the research design and method are the bottleneck for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — matching design (archival, survey, experiment, multi-method, field) and level of analysis to the theoretical question. Designs the study; it does not run the estimation or validity checks (amj-data-analysis).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Customize A2L (ASAP2) files generated from Simulink models using coder.asap2 and coder.mapping APIs. Use this skill when adding COMPU_METHODs, creating GROUPs, converting STD_AXIS to COM_AXIS, adding BIT_OPERATIONs, creating VARIANT_CODING, excluding measurements or struct elements, removing DEFAULT_EVENT_LIST, or any A2L customization for calibration tool compatibility (INCA, CANape). Also use when the user mentions ASAP2, ECU calibration data, A2L export.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze spatial cell-cell interactions, neighborhoods, and niches in IMC/MIBI data with squidpy and imcRtools, covering neighborhood-enrichment permutation nulls, the abundance-vs-density confound, inhomogeneous Ripley's K, cellular-neighborhood discovery, graph-construction (contact vs proximity), and edge effects. Use when testing whether cell types co-locate, choosing a spatial null, building a neighbor graph, discovering tissue niches, or deciding whether a spatial pattern is real or a density/segmentation artifact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。