「ownership」の検索結果

Guide for writing idiomatic Rust code based on Apollo GraphQL's best practices handbook. Use this skill when: (1) writing new Rust code or functions, (2) reviewing or refactoring existing Rust code, (3) deciding between borrowing vs cloning or ownership patterns, (4) implementing error handling with Result types, (5) optimizing Rust code for performance, (6) writing tests or documentation for Rust projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and verify professional multi-sheet KiCad hierarchies generated from Circuit Weaver functional sections. Use when adding, splitting, renaming, or reviewing schematic sheets, cross-sheet interfaces, root symbols, sheet ownership, or final hierarchy ERC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional C: memory ownership, defensive programming, build hygiene, and systems-level correctness. Use when writing, reviewing, or maintaining C code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, write, or manage Meta ads and assets: ad copy, campaigns, spend, reports, audiences, catalogs, product feeds, feed refresh schedules, experiments, and policy. Always load for any request to create or write an ad, or to advertise a product or service, even when no platform is named; this includes sensitive or restricted categories. Always load for any question asking what a Meta, Facebook, or Instagram advertising policy means, allows, prohibits, or requires, including a standalone policy-definition question with no account context. Those questions must use ads_policy_tool, never browser search or memory. Load for a specifically named catalog or feed with an upload or refresh-schedule request; use Ads reads to resolve ownership before writing. Generic unnamed feeds need context. Whether an image, claim or piece of copy may be used in an ad is ALWAYS a Meta Ads task — 'can I use this in an ad', 'is it allowed', 'is this against policy', and any rights, likeness, celebrity, logo or trademark question about advertising with an image, including a follow-up about one just generated. Those are ads-policy questions, not general legal ones. An ad request uses the campaign workflow unless explicitly only an image or organic post.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze fleet maintenance programs for preventive maintenance scheduling effectiveness, parts inventory forecasting, vehicle downtime minimization, total cost of ownership modeling, and telematics integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes asset lifecycle planning systems for capital expenditure forecasting, replacement scheduling, total cost of ownership modeling, depreciation tracking, and facility condition assessments using IFMA standards and Facility Condition Index scoring..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a business case with costs, benefits, and ROI. Use when the user says "cost-benefit analysis", "business case", "ROI calculation", "is this worth it", "justify the investment", "payback period", "benefits realization", "financial justification", "total cost of ownership", "should we build or buy", "investment appraisal" - even if they don't explicitly say "CBA".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate Claude Ads contracts, scoring inputs, run bundles, capabilities, source freshness, safety, installation, uninstall, or release readiness. Use for ads validate, ads status, ads next, stale claims with missing tool access, maturity checks, ownership-manifest uninstall, preserving unrelated ads-* skills, checksum verification, preflight, QA, or release audits. Missing access must demote stale evidence for the run and block dependent release-current claims before recovery guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Yuzu C++ source changes for resource ownership, RAII, borrowed lifetimes, C ABI contexts, casts, process/syscall boundaries, callbacks, threads, and sanitizer coverage. Use for any governance Gate 3 review when C++ files change, paired with cpp-expert.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure code while preserving behavior. Use for extraction, consolidation, ownership moves, or cleanup where verification must bracket structural edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when modifying a Genie-backed Pharo project through the live MCP server on localhost:8087; includes project ownership, image read/change/test/save workflow, and first steps for new user projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent senior-engineering quality auditor — architecture, ownership, domain integrity, abstraction, and maintainability. Use as `--gate` inside the ck:cook pipeline (blocks a phase on BLOCKER/HIGH/current-change MEDIUM findings) or call directly with `--audit`, `--diff`, `--changed` on any repository, directory, or file. Never writes tests and never edits production code — it returns structured findings only; ck:cook or ck:fix apply the fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent senior-engineering quality auditor — architecture, ownership, domain integrity, abstraction, and maintainability. Use as `--gate` inside the ck:cook pipeline (blocks a phase on BLOCKER/HIGH/current-change MEDIUM findings) or call directly with `--audit`, `--diff`, `--changed` on any repository, directory, or file. Never writes tests and never edits production code — it returns structured findings only; ck:cook or ck:fix apply the fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing Lookup vs Master-Detail vs Hierarchical vs External relationships: cascade delete, roll-up summaries, ownership, sharing implications, polymorphic lookups, junction objects, relationship depth limits. NOT for restricting which records a lookup can pick — use admin/lookup-filter-cross-object-patterns. NOT for a roll-up across a plain lookup — use data/roll-up-summary-alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, reviewing, or troubleshooting Salesforce duplicate prevention, matching rules, duplicate rules, and merge governance. Covers cleaning up duplicates that already exist at ordinary volume: merge sequencing, survivorship, stewardship ownership. Also covers the deployable MatchingRule / DuplicateRule metadata, the Alert-vs-Block action pair, DuplicateRecordSet reporting, and the Apex DMLOptions.DuplicateRuleHeader.allowSave bypass. Triggers: 'duplicate rule', 'matching rule', 'merge strategy', 'dedupe', 'survivorship', 'D&B', 'same contact twice', 'clean up duplicate records', 'clean up duplicate accounts', 'DUPLICATES_DETECTED', 'allowSave', 'FindDuplicates'. NOT for cleanup at volume — hundreds of thousands of records, batch merge jobs, DemandTools/Cloudingo — use data/large-scale-deduplication. NOT for which field values and child records the platform keeps in a merge - use data/record-merge-implications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a BA or admin needs to document the Salesforce data model: creating field inventories, object relationship maps, ER diagrams, or analyzing field usage across objects. Triggers: 'data dictionary', 'document our data model', 'object relationship map', 'field inventory', 'ER diagram for Salesforce'. NOT for designing the model or choosing lookup vs master-detail — use data/data-model-design-patterns. NOT for generating the Mermaid or PlantUML diagram — use architect/salesforce-erd-and-diagramming. More trigger keywords: field inventory CSV, describe API, getGlobalDescribe, DescribeFieldResult, sObject describe, schema snapshot, schema drift, blank field descriptions, undocumented fields, field ownership, data dictionary review cadence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when admins are reducing Chatter signal-to-noise across an org — covers org-level Chatter Email Settings, per-user Email Settings preferences, group-level email digest frequency (Daily / Weekly / Every post / Never), bell-icon Custom Notifications vs Chatter feed-post tradeoffs, automated-feed suppression on record types via Feed Tracking config, and the Chatter Settings org defaults that control whether new users start with everything-on. Triggers: 'chatter feed full of automated posts nobody reads', 'users complain about chatter email volume', 'turn off chatter notifications for a specific group', 'change default chatter digest frequency', 'stop process builder posts from filling the feed', 'NotificationFrequency invalid value', 'ChatterEmailsMD.settings will not deploy', 'custom notification recipient limit'. NOT for Custom Notifications API design (use apex/apex-custom-notifications-from-apex), NOT for Connect API / Chatter REST API integration patterns (use apex/apex-connect-api-chatter), NOT for Chatter group lifecycle, archiving, ownership and unlisted-group governance (use admin/chatter-group-governance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate API controller scope checks to framework-enforced authorization policies while preserving ownership checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve collector ownership from persisted source records and fail closed on missing owner OIDs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Step-by-step checklist for writing ownership enforcement (Forbid/403) tests on API controllers and Web MVC controllers that gate on CreatedByEntraOid

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for writing idiomatic Rust code based on Apollo GraphQL's best practices handbook. Use this skill when: (1) writing new Rust code or functions, (2) reviewing or refactoring existing Rust code, (3) deciding between borrowing vs cloning or ownership patterns, (4) implementing error handling with Result types, (5) optimizing Rust code for performance, (6) writing tests or documentation for Rust projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve or review ordinary dygo code changes for simplicity, focused scope, canonical ownership, clear boundaries, and verifiable behavior. Use for normal implementation and refactoring quality; use dygo-thermonuclear-review only for an explicitly severe audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose agent operational failures through default-policy checks, multi-gap analysis, explicit service ownership, request-context lifetime, and degradation-versus-correctness checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates structured U.S. art law summaries with Bluebook citations, doctrinal analysis, and stakeholder guidance. Use when researching art law precedents, advising on art transactions, preparing for art market litigation, or surveying a doctrine or statute across ownership, provenance, copyright, VARA, NAGPRA, authentication, NFTs, or AI-generated art.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。