「performing」の検索結果

Write a high-performing LinkedIn post in the user's brand voice using Hook-Story-Offer (Russell Brunson) and the Curiosity Gap hook method (George Loewenstein). Every post starts by selecting a named hook formula - specific number + surprising result, contrarian statement, personal confession, direct challenge, or before/after. Use when the user asks for a LinkedIn post, LinkedIn update, LinkedIn content, "post for LinkedIn", thought-leadership post, founder post, or short professional social content. Reads brand voice and ICP from knowledge/ so output sounds like the company, not generic AI. For long-form opinion pieces, see thought-leadership-writer. For the monthly posting plan, see social-calendar. For turning one asset into many posts, see content-repurposer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliver feedback using Kim Scott's Radical Candor framework - care personally while challenging directly. Use when a leader needs to give difficult feedback, says "I need to tell someone something hard", "how do I give feedback without hurting them", "I've been avoiding a conversation", "my direct report isn't performing", "someone on my team has a blind spot", "I keep sugarcoating things", or "how do I be honest without being a jerk". Also trigger when someone describes being too nice (ruinous empathy) or too harsh (obnoxious aggression), or when they describe avoiding a conversation they know they need to have.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and improve marketing copy that already exists - a page, an email, an ad, a post, a deck slide - using a fixed six-pass edit. Produces a marked-up diagnosis, a rewritten version, and a per-pass score so the user can see what changed and why. Use when the user says "review this copy", "improve this", "make this better", "tighten this", "edit this page", "does this copy work", "why is this flat", "punch this up", "proofread", or pastes existing copy and asks for feedback. Also use when copy is on-brand but underperforming. For writing new copy from nothing, see content-writer or landing-page-writer. For diagnosing a page's conversion problem beyond its words, see page-cro. For voice consistency rules, see brand-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhance and improve existing AI prompts using professional techniques from a 2,500+ prompt database. Adds detail, fixes structure, optimizes for specific models, and applies proven patterns from top-performing prompts. Use when user says "enhance my prompt", "improve this prompt", "make this prompt better", "optimize prompt", "fix my prompt", or "upgrade this prompt".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safely simulates and applies Google Cloud IAM v1 (Allow) policy changes. Uses the Policy Simulator to replay historical access logs against proposed policies to prevent breaking active workloads before applying the changes. Use when simulating or applying IAM v1 allow policies across Projects, Folders, or Organizations. Don't use for analyzing IAM v2 deny policies, VPC Service Controls, or performing general policy troubleshooting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for deep security incident and entity investigations in Google SecOps. Use when investigating cases, analyzing entities (hosts, IPs, domains, hashes, users), extracting and searching UDM events, performing asset and user timeline analysis, and detecting lateral movement across enterprise networks. Don't use for detection rule authoring or YARA-L tuning (use secops-detection-engineering), proactive hypothesis-driven hunting (use secops-hunt), initial alert triage (use secops-triage), or basic case status updates (use secops-cases).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for proactive threat hunting in Google SecOps. Use when proactively hunting for threats, retroactively analyzing indicators of compromise (IoCs), performing prevalence searches across enterprise events, hunting for MITRE ATT&CK techniques, or detecting behavioral and statistical outliers using UDM queries. Don't use for incoming alert triage (use secops-triage), active incident response and timeline deep-dives on a known breach (use secops-investigate), or detection rule authoring (use secops-detection-engineering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes the downstream impact (blast radius) when a BigQuery table or view is broken, stale, or modified. Identifies all downstream tables, dashboards, and processes that will be affected. Use when: - Performing a blast radius or impact analysis for a BigQuery table or view. - Assessing the consequences of modifying, deleting, or pausing updates to a BigQuery asset. - Identifying downstream dependencies (tables, dashboards, processes) of a BigQuery asset. Don't use for: - General BigQuery querying or data analysis (use BigQuery-related tools instead). - Non-BigQuery assets (e.g., Cloud Storage files) unless they are part of the BigQuery lineage. - Creating or modifying lineage links directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Processes GCP infrastructure design and deployment workflows within Application Design Center (ADC). Use when: - Designing GCP infrastructure with Terraform. - Validating local HCL. - Performing best-practice plan scans. - Importing templates to Application Design Center (ADC). - Deploying templates. - Troubleshooting deployment failures. Boundaries: - Only use for GCP-specific cloud infrastructure. - Only use for Terraform coding within the ADC context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing admin-level cleanup in a Salesforce org: deleting unused fields, removing inactive Flow versions, deactivating legacy automation, running Salesforce Optimizer or Org Check, and performing destructive metadata deploys. Triggers: 'clean up unused fields', 'delete inactive flows', 'run Optimizer', 'org has too many custom fields', 'remove old workflow rules', 'Flow version limit'. NOT for assessing or reporting on technical debt (use architect/technical-debt-assessment). NOT for code-level refactoring or Apex cleanup (use apex/ skills).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages datasets, tables, and jobs in BigQuery, and integrates with BigQuery ML and Gemini for advanced data analytics and AI-driven insights. Use when you need to interact with BigQuery, run SQL queries, manage BigQuery resources, or leverage BigQuery's built-in ML capabilities. Also use when performing data analysis, ingesting data into BigQuery, or developing AI applications on BigQuery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files). Triggers include: any mention of 'Word doc', 'word document', '.docx', or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when extracting or reorganizing content from .docx files, inserting or replacing images in documents, performing find-and-replace in Word files, working with tracked changes or comments, or converting content into a polished Word document. If the user asks for a 'report', 'memo', 'letter', 'template', or similar deliverable as a Word or .docx file, use this skill. Do NOT use for PDFs, spreadsheets, Google Docs, or general coding tasks unrelated to document generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides a simple command-line interface for performing administrative tasks that require elevated privileges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OWASP ASVS v5.0 security verification skill with Drupal 11 mappings. Use when performing security code reviews, implementing security requirements, or verifying security compliance in Drupal projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research process for comparing frontier harnesses (Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, autoresearch, Prime Agent) with the original/upstream implementation and performing GAP analysis before feature implementation. Triggered by "research" ("리서치"), "gap", "frontier", "harness", "case study" ("사례 조사"), "pattern exploration" ("패턴 탐색"), "comparative analysis" ("비교 분석") keywords.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced vulnerability analysis principles. OWASP Top 10 baseline + current threat landscape awareness, Supply Chain Security, attack surface mapping, risk prioritization. Use when performing security audits, threat modeling, or OWASP reviews. NOT for STRIDE/CSO-mode infrastructure audits (see mk:cso).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda scheduling, soft-core potentials, MBAR/BAR analysis, cycle-closure validation, and protocol-appropriate enhanced sampling. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes single-cell pooled CRISPR screens (Perturb-seq, CROP-seq, Perturb-CITE-seq, ECCITE-seq, multiome) where each cell carries an sgRNA and a scRNA-seq / surface-protein / chromatin readout. Covers experimental design (direct-capture Perturb-seq Dixit 2016 vs CROP-seq 3'UTR-barcoded Datlinger 2017 vs ECCITE-seq vs Multiome), MOI for sgRNA assignment, escaper-cell filtering (Mixscape, Papalexi 2021), SCEPTRE NB GLM + permutation for low-MOI (Barry 2024 Genome Biol 25:124), the Pertpy framework, factor decomposition, genome-scale Perturb-seq (Replogle 2022 Cell, 2.5M cells), and per-perturbation single-cell DE. Use when running a single-cell CRISPR screen, choosing direct-capture vs CROP-seq architecture, filtering escaper cells, performing single-cell DE, integrating Perturb-seq with pathway analysis, scaling to GW CRISPRi via Replogle protocol, or analyzing multi-omics screens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstruct ancestral states at internal phylogenetic nodes for sequences (PAML codeml, IQ-TREE --ancestral, GRASP, FastML), discrete traits (corHMM hidden-rate Markov, ape::ace, phytools::make.simmap stochastic mapping, BayesTraits), and continuous traits (phytools::fastAnc, geiger Brownian/OU, RPANDA). Use when designing constructs for ancestral protein resurrection, tracing trait evolution along a tree, performing stochastic character mapping, testing models of trait evolution (BM vs OU vs EB), inferring ancestral genome content via Dollo or DTL reconciliation, or quantifying ancestral-state uncertainty for downstream comparative analyses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect positive (diversifying / episodic / pervasive) selection using codon dN/dS frameworks. Implements PAML codeml site models (M0/M1a/M2a/M7/M8/M8a), branch models, branch-site model A (Zhang 2005), and HyPhy methods (BUSTED, BUSTED-S, BUSTED-MH, BUSTED-PH, MEME, FEL, FUBAR, aBSREL, SLAC, RELAX, GARD, FUBAR-MH). Includes McDonald-Kreitman framework (asymptotic alpha, impMKT, polyDFE, DFE-alpha, GRAPES) for within-species + divergence inference, RERconverge for trait-correlated rate shifts, CSUBST for convergent substitution, and PhyloAcc for accelerated noncoding evolution. Use when testing adaptive evolution at codons, branches, or full gene; running GARD recombination pre-screen; controlling alignment-error and gBGC false positives; reconciling PAML vs HyPhy results; or performing genome-scale selection scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimate causal effects of an exposure on an outcome from GWAS summary statistics using genetic instruments. Implements IVW (fixed/random), MR-Egger, weighted median/mode, MR-RAPS, CAUSE, GSMR-HEIDI, MR-PRESSO, MVMR, MR-Clust, LCV, and LHC-MR via TwoSampleMR, MendelianRandomization, MR-PRESSO, cause, and lhcMR. Use when testing causal direction between traits, evaluating drug-target effects via cis-pQTL/cis-eQTL, performing multivariable mediation MR, distinguishing causation from correlated horizontal pleiotropy, or producing STROBE-MR-compliant sensitivity batteries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process and analyze single-cell ATAC-seq data with Signac, ArchR, SnapATAC2, or Cell Ranger ATAC. Use when handling 10X scATAC or 10X Multiome (paired RNA+ATAC) data, performing per-cell QC, choosing between ArchR/Signac/SnapATAC2 ecosystems, building per-cluster consensus peaksets, integrating with paired scRNA-seq, doublet detection (AMULET vs ArchR vs scDblFinder), or running pseudobulk differential accessibility per cluster.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommends performing a dexamethasone suppression test to evaluate for autonomous cortisol secretion in patients with primary aldosteronism and adrenal adenoma. Triggered when a clinician considers whether to perform a dexamethasone suppression test in a patient with PA and adrenal adenoma.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommends performing biochemical testing for HPA axis at least 18-24 hours after last hydrocortisone dose or longer for synthetic glucocorticoids. Use when scheduling HPA axis testing in glucocorticoid-treated patient needing assessment of adrenal reserve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。