「question」の検索結果

Apply WIT (Writing Is Thinking) as a human–LLM collaborative scientific reasoning skill for scientific question formulation, finding-driven research planning, next-experiment selection, Results or Discussion review, claim–evidence and reviewer stress tests, manuscript logic audits, deadline closure, and researcher growth. Use when the user invokes WIT or asks for these question-driven scientific reasoning workflows; do not use for generic copyediting, summarization, or literature search alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a complete, professional client onboarding package for AI consultants, AI auditors, and solopreneurs working in the AI space (AI strategy, automation, AI readiness audits, implementation, training, etc.). Use this skill whenever a user asks to onboard a new client, set up a client folder, write a welcome email, generate a discovery questionnaire, draft a service agreement, or create a project brief — especially in an AI consulting context. Also trigger when the user says things like "I have a new client", "prepare onboarding docs", "create a client package", or "set up a new project". Produces four ready-to-use deliverables: intake questionnaire, welcome email, service agreement, and project brief.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a bounded Proto UI Contract, Prototype, Module, Host Capability, Adapter, schema, or ownership question and turn a genuinely unresolved direction into one semantic decision packet. Use for spec brainstorming, admission questions, competing semantic models, uncataloged behavior, or unresolved cross-layer boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, monetization strategy, or subscription models. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing', 'price', 'monetization', 'freemium', 'Van Westendorp', 'how much should I charge', 'pricing tiers', 'good-better-best', 'SaaS pricing', 'subscription model', 'free vs paid', 'packaging', 'pricing page', 'annual vs monthly', or is deciding between free and paid models. Make sure to use this whenever someone is making ANY pricing decision — even questions like 'should I charge for this?' or 'is freemium right for us?' or 'my conversion rate is low, is it the price?' are pricing strategy questions. Covers value-based pricing, tier structure, price psychology, and competitor benchmarking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for any question about a codebase, its architecture, file relationships, or project content — especially when graphify-out/ exists, where the question should be treated as a graphify query first. Turns any input (code, docs, papers, images, videos) into a persistent knowledge graph with god nodes, community detection, and query/path/explain tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a measured semantic core for a brand through official keyword APIs (Yandex Wordstat for RU, Google Ads Keyword Planner / Bing Webmaster worldwide, autocomplete everywhere), commit it as core.json plus a questions.csv, and hand that straight to an open-geo visibility run. Use when the user wants demand research, a semantic core, keyword volume, or "collect the questions and then measure visibility" — no browser and no manual keyword tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct structured interviews with the user. Use when multiple decisions need user input: ask ONE question at a time, wait for response, record answer, then proceed to next question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up and operate customer workspaces: route customer updates, record meetings, track questions and actions, manage workstreams, and prepare handoffs. Use when creating or maintaining a customer workspace, processing meeting notes or updates, reviewing next actions, or preparing a handoff. Triggers: customer workspace, 顧客ワークスペース, inbox 追加, 議事録管理, 案件更新, 宿題管理, 引き継ぎ.

Generate or improve a company-specific data analysis skill by extracting tribal knowledge from analysts. BOOTSTRAP MODE - → Discovers schemas, asks key questions, generates initial skill with reference files ITERATION MODE - → Loads existing skill, asks targeted questions, appends/updates reference files Use when data analysts want Claude to understand their company's specific data warehouse, terminology, metrics definitions, and common query patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build production-ready analytical SQL queries using CTEs, window functions, aggregations, and data transformations. Translates business questions into well-documented, performant queries. Use when writing reporting queries, building data pipelines, or answering ad-hoc business questions with SQL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a short, prioritized questionnaire for a collaborating stablecoin team when public evidence cannot resolve important Pharos data or confidence gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hand a Prisma Next question or report off to the team — file a GitHub issue (bug or feature request), or route Q&A / design discussion / direct-team-contact to the Prisma Discord at pris.ly/discord. Use for bug, bug report, file an issue, report a bug, feature request, missing feature, this should be a feature, file this, this is a bug, this is broken, surprising behaviour, this doesn't work, file feedback, send feedback, capability gap, file via prisma-next-feedback, ask the team, talk to the team, talk to the Prisma team, talk to Prisma, Discord, Prisma Discord, Q&A, design feedback, is this the intended way, how should I do X, extension author question, extension author needs help.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Put one question to several models at once — you, OpenAI Codex, and a cheap third via OpenCode — and show all the answers side by side. No judging, no consensus: three opinions, the user picks. Use for "ask everyone", "what do the other models think", "second opinion", "multi ask", or any open question where one model's answer is not enough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the explicit, human-in-the-loop Circuit Weaver questionnaire from requirements through a validated design and KiCad handoff. Use only when the user asks for the design-wizard skill, the offline interactive wizard, or a slow step-by-step guided questionnaire. Do not trigger for ordinary new-design requests; use circuit-weaver for automatic end-to-end orchestration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or refine a research hypothesis. Use when the user says "write a hypothesis", "frame my hypothesis", "is my hypothesis testable", "null and alternative hypothesis", "research hypothesis", "refine my hypothesis", "hypothesis statement", "H0 and H1", "operationalize my hypothesis", "turn my research question into a hypothesis", or needs to convert a research question or intuition into a falsifiable, testable hypothesis with clear variables and predictions - even if they don't explicitly say "hypothesis".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate user research interview scripts using Mom Test principles. Use this skill when: - You are preparing for user interviews or pilot observation sessions - You need a question bank organized by behavior, context, pain points, and workflow - You want interview guides that avoid leading questions and hypotheticals - You need per-persona interview guides - You are preparing for field visits or pilot debriefs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**WORKFLOW SKILL** — Structured context analysis before acting. USE FOR: questioning assumptions, mapping dependencies, identifying blind spots, validating scope of any task or subject. Use to contextualize, question, analyze before implementing, review premises, prevent hallucination, structured assessment. DO NOT USE FOR: simple tasks where task-intent suffices, direct implementation, code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer an explicitly vault-scoped question from an Obsidian wiki without changing it. Use when the user selects the vault as the evidence source: query the wiki, query quick, query deep, explain from the wiki, summarize the vault, find in wiki, search the wiki, or based on the wiki. Do not route ordinary general-knowledge questions here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design Agentforce conversations that span multiple turns without losing context: session variable scoping, conversation memory, clarifying-question patterns, topic-to-topic (now subagent) handoff, and the right abstractions for accumulating state across turns. NOT for deciding the topic boundaries themselves or out-of-scope behavior — use agentforce/agent-topic-design. NOT for single-turn agent actions and their input/output contracts — use agentforce/agent-actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry point for the SfSkills Salesforce library: 1,040 skill packages across 11 domains (admin, agentforce, apex, architect, data, devops, flow, integration, lwc, omnistudio, security), 70 run-time agents and 92 slash commands. Use for any Salesforce, Force.com or Lightning Platform question — Apex, SOQL, SOSL, triggers, Flow, LWC, sObject, custom field, permission set, profile, sharing rule, validation rule, deployment, sandbox, Agentforce, OmniStudio, org setup. This skill does not answer Salesforce questions itself; it routes to the specific skill package that does, then hands off to a domain router.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract tacit knowledge through non-obvious microquestions — things only the user knows that can't be found in code, docs, or research. Use when you're about to guess at intent, context, or constraints during SAFEWORD's understanding flow. Also use when user says 'ask me', 'what do you need to know', or when another skill (bdd, brainstorm, debug) needs user context before proceeding. Do NOT use for questions answerable by reading the codebase or searching the web.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured multi-hop web research with explicit confidence gating — plan the inquiry, search (WebSearch/WebFetch), score your own confidence, and keep digging until the answer is well-supported or a hop cap is hit, then emit a cited synthesis. Learns across sessions by storing each research case to memory and reusing prior strategies. Use when a question needs more than one search — comparisons, current-best-practice questions, anything where a single lookup leaves you unsure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures a vague engineering request into a well-scoped task brief before any implementation begins. Use when the user has an engineering goal but the ask is missing which repos are in scope, what "done" means, constraints, or open questions. Triggers on "shape this", "scope this out", "frame this work", "write a brief for", "I want to build" (with unclear scope), or the /shape slash command. Produces a filled task template (multi-repo feature, single-repo change, investigation, or bugfix). Not for already-scoped work — go straight to execution. If the domain is unclear, ask one qualifying question before routing — for marketing intake see marketing-shaper, game-design intake see game-design-shaper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。