「raci」の検索結果

Use when the user is debugging a bug, tracing an error, or asking why something fails. Examples: "Why is X failing?", "Where does this error come from?", "Trace this bug"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding cross-cutting concerns to durable functions — structured logging or tracing across all functions, error tracking with Sentry, payload encryption for sensitive data, dependency injection of clients (DB, Stripe, etc.) into function handlers, custom telemetry, or behavior that should apply uniformly across many functions. Covers Inngest middleware lifecycle, creating custom middleware, dependencyInjectionMiddleware, @inngest/middleware-encryption, @inngest/middleware-sentry, and custom middleware patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Especialista en configuración de agentes de IA: templates, tools, models, prompts y seed data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate stuck runs and execution failures by tracing Symphony and Codex logs with issue/session identifiers; use when runs stall, retry repeatedly, or fail unexpectedly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and detect synthetic media, including deepfake videos, AI-generated images, and cloned voice audio. Use this skill when investigating potential disinformation campaigns, verifying the authenticity of digital evidence, or assessing social engineering attacks leveraging synthetic media (e.g., vishing with voice clones, spear-phishing with deepfake video calls). Covers artifact analysis, frequency detection, metadata tracing, and automated detection tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

White-box source code security review structured around OWASP ASVS 5.0 (427 verification requirements across 16 chapters). Reads and understands application source code to build a security-aware knowledge base that enriches all downstream skills. Covers: tech stack identification, route/endpoint mapping, authentication and authorization architecture, dangerous function patterns, source-to-sink data flow tracing, IaC review, dependency analysis, ASVS compliance mapping, and LLM integration security (prompt injection, tool abuse, output handling, RAG poisoning, MCP server patterns). When LLM/AI framework usage is detected, automatically reviews OWASP LLM Top 10 patterns from source code and chains into /ai-redteam with white-box context for live endpoint testing. Chains into /pentester, /threat-modeling, /web-exploit, /api-security, /cloud-security, /analyze-cve, /credential-audit, and /ai-redteam — providing white-box context that transforms black-box testing into targeted, informed assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes CVE vulnerabilities in project dependencies with code path tracing and PoC generation for Burp Suite. Traces vulnerable code from user input to sink, assesses exploitability, and generates HTTP requests for testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or reviewing request handlers, RPCs, or background jobs for production; adding tracing, metrics, or structured-log calls; or making diagnosability decisions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI integration review patterns. Use when reviewing model API calls, prompt construction, LLM output handling, RAG pipelines, and tool-calling code. Covers prompt-injection call-chain tracing, output validation, token budgets, retry/timeout handling, streaming, and key/PII exposure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LangChain.js patterns for building LLM applications — chat models, LCEL chains, prompt templates, structured output, agents, tools, RAG, streaming, and LangSmith tracing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LLM observability with Langfuse — OpenTelemetry-based tracing, evaluations, prompt management, datasets, and production best practices

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This repo is indexed by graft/. For ANY task here, whether understanding how something works, finding where code lives, tracing what calls a symbol or what a change breaks, or scoping an edit, get your context from graft before grepping or reading source files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate stuck runs and execution failures by tracing Symphony and Codex logs with issue/session identifiers; use when runs stall, retry repeatedly, or fail unexpectedly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverses .NET/managed malware: decompiling MSIL back to C#, defeating common .NET protectors and string encryptors, and tracing reflection-based loaders to recover the real payload. Activates for requests to analyze a .NET sample, decompile MSIL, or unpack a managed loader.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Study unfamiliar codebases and produce evidence-backed knowledge artifacts. Use for repository orientation, architecture mapping, subsystem tracing, onboarding, or codebase documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a dental assistant — sequencing instrument transfer during a procedure, troubleshooting a retake-worthy radiograph before re-exposing the patient, tracing a failed sterilization-cycle indicator back to the affected instrument batches, or timing a chairside material mix against its working-time window across multiple prepped teeth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a systems engineer/architect working at the whole-program level — decomposing requirements across hardware/software/network subsystems, writing or reviewing an interface control document (ICD), making a build-vs-buy tradeoff for a subsystem, or tracing a verification failure back through the requirements baseline. Distinct from a software engineer (owns one service's code) or DevOps/SRE (owns operational reliability) — this role owns the technical baseline for a whole system-of-systems and is accountable when subsystems built by different teams or vendors don't fit together.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Coating/Painting/Spraying Machine Operator — calculating wet film thickness from a target dry film thickness and the coating's percent volume solids, deciding whether flash-off time can be shortened to increase throughput, verifying cure by actual part temperature rather than oven setpoint, or tracing an adhesion failure back to surface prep rather than the coating application.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Commercial and Industrial Electronics Repairer — diagnosing a VFD fault trip on a production line, tracing a PLC I/O fault back to the sensor, the wiring, or the ladder logic, selecting arc-flash PPE for live-panel diagnostic work, triaging multiple simultaneous down-lines by downtime-cost-per-hour, or deciding drive/board swap versus component-level repair.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Calibration Technologist/Technician — computing a Test Uncertainty Ratio (TUR) and deciding whether it meets the 4:1 target, building a measurement uncertainty budget (Type A/Type B, GUM-style) for a calibration, tracing a reference standard's chain of custody to NIST/SI, setting or adjusting a calibration interval from in-tolerance/out-of-tolerance history, or writing the accept/reject call and guard-banded pass/fail on a calibration certificate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Bookkeeping, Accounting, and Auditing Clerk — reconciling a bank or credit card account, resolving an AP three-way-match discrepancy before payment, coding an expense to the correct account and department, tracing a general ledger discrepancy to root cause, or running a month-end close checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Baker — scaling a formula using baker's percentages to hit an exact batch weight, diagnosing whether a fermentation problem traces to dough temperature or mixing development, judging proof readiness from a poke test rather than a fixed clock, or tracing a poor-oven-spring result back to over- or under-proofing instead of the oven.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Aerospace Engineer — reconciling a vehicle mass/weight budget against a certification limit, computing a structural margin of safety, choosing a means of compliance for an FAA certification basis, tracing a weight-growth overrun back to a design decision, or evaluating a propulsion/aerodynamics tradeoff against a range or payload requirement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。