1,319 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Draft or submit Apache SeaTunnel pull requests in English using the repository's required title and body conventions. Use when Codex needs to prepare a PR from the current branch or diff, infer a compliant `[Type][Module][SubModule] Description` title, fill the required PR template, describe what changed from git history or file diffs, or open the PR after the user provides or omits the change summary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a unanimous written consent of the board or a committee in house format, with precedent search from the consents repository. Handles multi-resolution consents, director conflict flags, state-law notice requirements, and signatory tracking, with a built-in scope warning for major one-off actions. Use when user says "written consent", "unanimous consent", "board consent", "consent in lieu", "UWC", or describes an action needing board approval without a meeting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and review high-quality technical docs as well as agent instruction files in your repository.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply ClawHub-specific Convex conventions and route to the right managed Convex skill. Use for any change under convex/, Convex commands or deployment targeting, query performance, migrations, retention, runtime validation, or skill stat reads and writes in the ClawHub repository.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ensures all new files include proper Apache 2.0 license headers. Use when creating any new file in the Apache Beam repository.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trigger: issue creation, bug reports, feature requests, or issue approval. Create and triage GitHub issues from repository evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Selects bounded, graph-informed source slices with Trailmark and delegates focused code analysis or patch-proposal work to a smaller subagent. Use when offloading function-, class-, caller-, callee-, call-path-, entrypoint-, or line-focused code tasks to constrained or locally hosted models without exposing the full repository.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "open source this project", "prepare this repository for public release", "make this repo public", "check open-source readiness", "choose a license for this project", or "set up release automation" ahead of a public launch. Provides a release-readiness workflow covering secrets hygiene, licensing, documentation, CI, and language-specific packaging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares codebases for security review using Trail of Bits' checklist. Helps set review goals, runs static analysis tools, increases test coverage, removes dead code, ensures accessibility, and generates documentation (flowcharts, user stories, inline comments). Use when preparing your own codebase to be audited by someone else, getting a repository review-ready before an external security review, deciding what to fix before auditors start, or asking what assessors need from a project. For understanding unfamiliar code you are about to audit, use audit-context-building instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive offensive methodology for software supply chain attacks covering the full kill chain from reconnaissance through exploitation. Addresses dependency confusion across npm, PyPI, and NuGet ecosystems where internal registry override allows an attacker to inject malicious packages that shadow private dependencies. Covers typosquatting techniques for popular packages, compromised package injection via maintainer account takeover or social engineering, and build system attacks through Makefile injection, setup.py install hooks, and npm postinstall scripts. Extends into CI/CD artifact tampering where build outputs are replaced or modified in transit, code signing abuse through stolen or self-signed certificates, upstream repository compromise via commit injection or force-push to trusted repos, and container image supply chain attacks including base image trojaning and registry confusion. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.001 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools) and T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Integrates tooling such as confused for dependency confusion scanning and dependency-check for known vulnerable component detection. Each technique section provides reproducible proof-of-concept patterns, detection guidance for defenders, and engagement-safe execution notes for authorized red team operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Codex is already in the validation phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to determine whether one or more candidate security findings are valid. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Codex is already in the attack-path-analysis phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to trace a security finding from source to sink and calibrate severity. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a deep, exhaustive, multi-pass, or variance-reducing repository-wide or scoped-path Codex Security scan. Run repeated complete independent Standard scans with the Codex Security deep-scan tool, which aggregates their validated findings and prepares the canonical artifacts; then complete the same scan once. Do not use for PRs, commits, branch diffs, or working-tree diffs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define, review, or update SECURITY.md guidance for a repository or component. Use when the user wants to clarify what Codex Security should review, what is out of scope, which security properties must hold, or whether existing guidance still matches the code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage supplied or imported security findings against a repository using its security policy and static code evidence. Accepts scanner reports, advisories, GitHub findings, and Jira or Linear tickets. Do not use for discovery, duplicate triage, runtime validation, or fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only when the user explicitly asks to fix and verify a validated or plausible security vulnerability. Do not use for ordinary bug fixes, correctness or design review findings, general validation, or full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding validation, or full repository scans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when changing OpenRig's own source in a clone of the openrig repository: finding which package or file owns a behaviour, choosing which tests to run, testing a change without disturbing the OpenRig daemon your own session runs on, judging whether a diff touches a high-risk area, or preparing a pull request. Not for operating rigs (openrig-skills) or designing rig topologies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user wants a continuing software team for a real repository, or has a first OpenRig team and needs a repeatable path for reviewed work and later tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Use when the user asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats or abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do NOT use for general architecture summaries, code review, security best practices (use security-best-practices), or non-security design work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technology-agnostic guidance for modular systems: bounded contexts, clear boundaries, composability, state isolation, explicit contracts, failure containment, scaffolding workflows, split/merge criteria, sub-units inside a context, and compliance review signals. Use when designing or reviewing module structure, service boundaries, package layout, cross-cutting dependencies, "how should we split this?", modularity assessments, coupling between domains, greenfield context design, or architecture discussions without assuming a specific framework, language, or repository layout. Do NOT use for executing the full Patterns 1–5 repo decomposition pipeline or per-pattern inventories (use modular-decomposition), phased extraction roadmaps as the main deliverable (use decomposition-planning-roadmap), or end-to-end legacy migration strategy (use legacy-migration-planner).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mandatory iPolloWork code-change gate for modern, minimal, performant, reuse-first implementation and clean repository ownership. Use whenever AI creates, edits, deletes, or refactors application code, server code, packages, scripts, tests, dependencies, schemas, routes, UI, or generated-file workflows. Reuse existing code before creating files, keep one source of truth, prevent parallel implementations and junk directories, justify every new file or dependency, and audit the current change before completion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this umbrella skill when the request spans multiple Cloud Claw user-facing domains, especially launching a new AltClaw or OpenClaw VM and then managing lifecycle, logs, renewal, or dashboard access through the local altllm cloud-claw-* commands in this repository.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。