2,258 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when the plan_ref returned by add-new-feature is provided. Executes the SAM implementation loop — opens an attempt per ready task, dispatches each to a specialist agent in parallel, settles and judges what comes back, manages bookend tasks (T0 baseline capture and TN verification), and tracks concerns and contract violations per task. Drives task state through the work ledger via the SAM CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits a methods section against a 45-item reporting checklist synthesized from the APSA Experimental Section rubric, JARS-Quant, CONSORT, and DA-RT, covering pre-registration, recruitment, randomization and treatments, sample flow and attrition, sample-size justification, three-tier results labeling, conjoint reporting, validity, and open-science infrastructure. Use when checking whether a methods section reports enough, preparing a submission or replication archive, asking what CONSORT, JARS, or DA-RT require, or documenting a deviation from a pre-analysis plan. Writing that plan before data collection goes to pre-registration-writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs multi-country survey experiments, covering case selection with a stated comparative logic, instrument localization and TRAPD translation, stimulus calibration, per-country power, and pooled versus per-country analysis with measurement-equivalence checks. Use when the user fields the same experiment in several countries, asks which countries to include, how to adapt an instrument without breaking comparability, whether to pool, or how large each country sample must be. Question wording goes to survey-design, reporting to methods-reporting, the study plan to pre-registration-writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain upstream SAML identity-provider authentication, request/response browser binding, ACS and assertion validation, pinned signing certificates, and signed TLS/browser tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when more than one agent may need the same single-instance resource at the same time — most of all the local server loop, which holds the one URL (https://local.voxt.ai, port 7080) the app can run on. Also when you are about to dispatch several agents that will test the UI, when you find another agent already using the loop, or when the user says "coordinate", "shared resource", "queue for the server".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds credible TAM/SAM/SOM analysis with external validation and sensitivity testing for startup fundraising: top-down, bottom-up, or both. Use when the user asks to size a market or check market claims and gives something to size: a product or service description, a market segment, or a deck with TAM/SAM/SOM claims. A full run takes about 15–20 minutes and searches the web, 30 or more with a large data room or a revision round, so for a passing question about market size, answer briefly in chat and offer the analysis instead of starting it. When it runs, every figure is externally sourced and stress-tested, never estimated from memory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mock skill shipped by the sample bundle for installer testing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and build runnable iOS UI mockups in SwiftUI, including UI direction, multiple visual or interaction variants, realistic sample data, state switching, Xcode Previews, and Simulator validation. Use when the user wants to explore what an iOS screen should look like, compare SwiftUI UI ideas, create a clickable native prototype, validate an app flow before production implementation, or asks for a SwiftUI mock, iOS mockup, native prototype, 画面モック, UI案, SwiftUIで動くモック, or 実際に触れるiOSモック.
Select an OCR/HTR engine by benchmarking candidates on the same labelled samples — source ground truth from open datasets (e.g. Hugging Face PAGE-XML corpora) or hand-transcription, wrap every engine behind a transcribe(image_path) -> str adapter (vision-LLMs via any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, dedicated HTR REST APIs, cloud OCR), and score with zero-dependency raw CER, lenient CER, WER, and a critical name/date token diff. Use when choosing an engine for handwriting or historical-document transcription, when published accuracy claims need honest verification on your own material, or when a records workflow must surface confident-but-wrong names and dates that a low aggregate CER hides.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate and optimise novel small molecules with REINVENT 4 — de novo sampling from a chemical language model, scaffold decoration with LibInvent, fragment linking with LinkInvent, and similarity-constrained analogue generation with Mol2Mol. Use this skill to set up reinforcement-learning or curriculum runs, compose a multi-parameter scoring function from docking scores, predictive models, and physicochemical desirability, and read the resulting sampled sets. Also trigger on REINVENT, LibInvent, LinkInvent, Mol2Mol, scaffold hopping, R-group replacement, linker design, chemical language model, or reinforcement-learning molecule optimisation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DiffDock and DiffDock-L diffusion-based molecular docking. Use for blind protein-small-molecule pose prediction from a PDB file or sequence plus SMILES/SDF/MOL2, batch docking over a CSV of complexes, virtual screening triage, sampling multiple poses per complex, and reading the confidence score correctly. Also trigger on DiffDock, DiffDock-L, inference.py, confidence_model, samples_per_complex, ESM embedding preparation for docking, or blind docking without a defined box. Not for binding affinity prediction — the confidence score ranks pose plausibility, not potency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Solve competition math problems (IMO, Putnam, USAMO, AIME) with adversarial verification that catches the errors self-verification misses. Activates when asked to 'solve this IMO problem', 'prove this olympiad inequality', 'verify this competition proof', 'find a counterexample', 'is this proof correct', or for any problem with 'IMO', 'Putnam', 'USAMO', 'olympiad', or 'competition math' in it. Uses pure reasoning (no tools) — then a fresh-context adversarial verifier attacks the proof using specific failure patterns, not generic 'check logic'. Outputs calibrated confidence — will say 'no confident solution' rather than bluff. If LaTeX is available, produces a clean PDF after verification passes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a YARA rule, "write YARA for this sample/family", or `/hash-investigation` / `/malware-analysis` surfaces a sample worth a static-content rule. Pattern-matching rules for identifying malicious files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when characterising a malware sample, the user asks "what does this binary do?" / "analyse this hash deeply", or `/hash-investigation` flags a novel sample warranting deeper review. Static + dynamic methodology, behavioural indicators, sandbox interpretation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply Institutional Theory (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983) to analyze how coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphic pressures shape organizational structures and practices. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why organizations in the same field look alike, evaluate whether a practice was adopted for legitimacy vs efficiency, analyze regulatory or social pressures on strategy, or when they ask 'why do all firms in this industry do the same thing', 'is this best practice or just conformity', or 'how do regulations shape our structure'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Support SOX 404 compliance with control testing methodology, sample selection, and documentation standards. Use when generating testing workpapers, selecting audit samples, classifying control deficiencies, or preparing for internal or external audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Calculate Wilson Score confidence intervals for ranking items by positive proportion with sample size correction. Use this skill when the user needs to rank products by ratings, sort content by approval rate, or build a 'best rated' list that accounts for sample size — even if they say 'rank by star rating', 'best rated with few reviews', or 'confidence-adjusted rating'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SAML SSO assertion attack playbook. Use when testing signature validation, assertion wrapping, audience restrictions, ACS handling, XML trust boundaries, and enterprise SSO flaws.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify and exploit Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities by bypassing weak or flawed anti-CSRF token implementations, SameSite cookie attributes, and Origin/Referer headers. Use this skill when testing state-changing web application endpoints for session riding attacks. Covers token removal, token fixation, multipart manipulation, and chaining with XSS for complete bypass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automates batch reverse engineering by generating Ghidra analyzeHeadless commands and post-analysis script skeletons to import, auto-analyze, and export results for many samples without the GUI. Activates for requests to script Ghidra headless analysis, batch-analyze samples with Ghidra, or generate an analyzeHeadless command and post-script.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Computes cryptographic and fuzzy fingerprints for malware samples: MD5/SHA-1/SHA-256 for exact identity, plus import hashing (imphash), section hashing, and fuzzy hashes (ssdeep, TLSH) to cluster related variants. Activates for requests to hash a sample, compute imphash, or fingerprint files for similarity clustering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summarizes runtime behavior of a sample from Procmon-style operation logs — process and thread creation, file and registry writes, and network-related operations — to build a behavioral profile. Activates for requests to analyze Procmon output, summarize sample behavior, or profile process/file/registry activity from a sandbox run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extracts an embedded malware configuration (C2 hosts, ports, campaign IDs, keys) from a process memory dump by locating decrypted config structures and decoding common obfuscation layers. Activates for requests to extract malware config from a memory dump, recover C2 settings from a running sample, or decode an in-memory configuration block.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a sample in an instrumented sandbox to observe behavior: process tree, file and registry changes, network activity, and persistence, then summarizes the behavioral report into capabilities and IOCs. Activates for requests to detonate a sample, do dynamic or behavioral analysis, or interpret sandbox output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。