「science」の検索結果

Use before running any confirmatory analysis or looking at outcome data, when testing a hypothesis, computing a p-value, or about to claim an effect - locks predictions and decision rules before results are seen

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing a pre-registered analysis plan with mostly independent steps in the current session

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a result is surprising, impossible, contradicts a sanity check, a pipeline fails, a model won't converge, or a replication fails - before adjusting anything

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving critical feedback on an analysis or manuscript, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or methodologically questionable - requires verification, not performative agreement or blind changes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Router for DeepAnalyze agentic data-science workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks about "mystery", "fair play", "clue", "red herring", "romance beats", "HEA", "thriller", "ticking clock", "horror", "dread", "MG", "YA", "middle grade", "young adult", "science fiction", "sci-fi", "fantasy", "quest", "chosen one", "historical fiction", "period voice", "anachronism", "comedy", "humour", "humor", "romcom", "farce", "satire", "running gag", "serial", "episodic", "web serial", "genre conventions", or wants genre-specific structural craft for a story project. NOT for a clue check as a revision pass (use revision-continuity).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a Seedance 2.0 science, education, or general-knowledge explainer using layered handmade papercraft, miniature diorama depth, physical paper mechanisms, clear knowledge beats, restrained miniature camera, tactile sound, and stable reference roles. Use for one 4–15 second clip or a longer multi-clip plan; not for flat vector cartoons, live action, or paper-texture-only styling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning style of Kaiming He, computer vision pioneer and creator of ResNet. Use this skill whenever you are designing deep learning architectures, debugging neural network optimization, formulating generative AI problems, or bridging AI with other scientific domains. Trigger this skill for discussions on network depth, weight initialization, residual learning, flow matching, or when reframing discriminative tasks as conditional generation. It emphasizes simplicity in complex visual problems, end-to-end optimization, and viewing AI as a universal language for science.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning style of Geoffrey Hinton, deep learning pioneer and 2018 Turing Award winner. Use this skill whenever evaluating AI safety, existential risk, neural network architectures, cognitive science, or tech regulation. Reach for this when the user is discussing LLM capabilities (understanding vs. autocomplete), the biological vs. digital intelligence divide, AI alignment strategies, or the societal/economic impacts of automation. It is highly applicable when dealing with contrarian scientific ideas, hardware/software integration (mortal vs. immortal computing), or global cooperation on technological threats. Do not wait for the user to name Hinton; trigger this skill proactively for any deep learning or AI existential risk analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill channels the strategic and scientific reasoning of Demis Hassabis, CEO and co-founder of Google DeepMind, AlphaGo and AlphaFold, and 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Use this skill whenever you are evaluating AI for scientific discovery, tackling "root node" problems, designing reinforcement learning systems, or discussing AGI timelines, safety, and global governance. Reach for it when the user faces massive combinatorial search spaces, wants to apply AI to physical/biological sciences (like digital biology), or needs to balance rapid AI scaling with the rigorous scientific method. Apply these mental models to shift the focus from building consumer apps to using AI as the ultimate meta-solution for understanding reality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn vague or partially formed AI, computer-science, data-driven, and engineering-method research directions into evidence-grounded, falsifiable, paper-ready Research Idea Briefs through heuristic questioning, staged confirmation, literature positioning, novelty attack, and method-figure planning. Use when the user needs to clarify a research idea, formalize inputs/outputs/objectives/constraints, frame background and motivation, select 3-5 anchor papers, identify a defensible gap, derive 2-3 contributions, stress-test novelty, or design an input-to-output method framework and core-paper figure. Also trigger on requests such as 明确科研 idea、启发式梳理 idea、互动追问科研问题、梳理论文创新点、定义研究任务、找对标论文、把研究方向变成论文方案、画方法框架图. Do not use as the primary workflow for running experiments, exhaustive systematic reviews, drafting full manuscript sections, or polishing finished prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Global Health Researcher. Use when a task calls for Global Health Researcher judgment. Reasons from burden, equity, and health-system building blocks through DHS/MICS/DHIS2/GBD triangulation, cluster and stepped-wedge designs, RE-AIM/CFIR implementation science, and CIOMS-fair partnership while treating survey weights, HMIS completeness, and GBD smoothing as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Ecologist. Use when a task calls for Ecologist judgment. Reasons from Preston/Fisher SADs and Hutchinson fundamental vs realized niches; designs quadrat/transect and distance/occupancy surveys; filters GBIF issue flags and iNaturalist DQA; fits vegan/iNEXT/unmarked GLMMs with Moran's I and nlme/glmmTMB spatial correlation while treating pseudoreplication, effort bias, and citizen-science artifacts as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Computer Security Researcher. Use when a task calls for Computer Security Researcher judgment. Reasons from explicit threat models and CIA/STRIDE through AFL++/libFuzzer triage, ASan/KASAN oracles, ProVerif/Tamarin proofs, CVE/CWE/CAPEC taxonomies, CyberGym dual-execution benchmarks, Menlo/CVD ethics, and USENIX open-science artifact norms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research emerging academic trends by combining scholarly databases, web sources, and news to identify rising research areas, breakthrough papers, and shifting scientific consensus. Ideal for R&D teams tracking frontier science.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent production workflow for creating Manim-based explainer animations. Use when an agent must plan, code, render, QA, or hand off precise math, science, data, diagram, algorithm, or concept animations with Manim, including storyboard, scene architecture, formulas, coordinate systems, voiceover timing, accessibility, reproducibility, provenance, and delivery decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent production workflow for AI agents creating educational animated lessons, classroom explainers, STEM visualizations, history/social-science animations, training modules, microlearning clips, whiteboard-style explainers, diagram-driven videos, and generated or assembled instructional animation assets. Use when planning, scripting, storyboarding, generating, reviewing, localizing, or QAing animation whose primary purpose is learning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semi-automated fact-checking, source credibility evaluation, misinformation detection, prebunking, and evidence-ledger based claim verification. Use when a user asks to verify a claim, article, social post, screenshot, URL, quote, data point, compare sources, detect manipulation, evaluate source reliability, or generate an HTML fact-check card/share-safe correction. Supports text, URLs, screenshots/images, two-source comparison, and topic-level prebunking in Bulgarian, English, Russian, EU policy, health, science, and geopolitical contexts. Trigger phrases: "is this true?", "is this fake?", "fact check this", "compare these sources", "проверка на факти", "истина ли е", "дезинформация ли е", "сравни тези източници".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maxim Design System Intelligence — token architecture (primitive→semantic→component), component library governance, CSS variable systems, Tailwind integration, design-to-code handoff, Storybook, Figma token export. Activate for design system creation, token audits, component specs, dark mode systems, brand-to-token sync. Powered by Maxim behavioral science + Atomic Design + TOGAF governance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maxim Brand Intelligence — brand identity, voice architecture, visual identity systems, messaging frameworks, brand consistency enforcement. Activate for brand strategy, brand audits, brand guidelines, tone of voice, asset compliance, color palette, typography specs. Powered by Maxim behavioral science layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and synthesize research papers, whitepapers, PDFs, technical reports, and academic sources with Firecrawl Research, using semantic paper search, related-paper expansion, and in-body verification over Firecrawl's paper index — largely biomedical and life-science literature from PubMed, bioRxiv, and medRxiv, plus arXiv preprints in CS, physics, and math. Use when the user wants a literature review, systematic review, survey of studies, paper summary, research landscape, or sourced synthesis from scholarly and industry publications, including clinical, drug, gene, disease, epidemiology, and public-health topics. Prefer this over a general web-research workflow whenever the evidence base is published papers rather than web pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrarian views, open questions, and full sources. Use only when the user needs rigorous synthesis of a complex topic (scientific, technical, policy, or market-analytical) that cannot be answered with a short search, and wants a formal written report, not a recommendation list. Do not use for product picks, top-N lists, quick lookups, or routine "find out about X" tasks. If the request does not clearly need this kind of report, do not use this skill. Do not use for a literature review over published papers. This skill collects evidence from the open web. A request for the literature on a biomedical, clinical, life-science, or other scientific topic — papers, studies, trials, preprints — belongs to firecrawl-research-papers, which queries Firecrawl's paper index (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv) instead of searching websites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sector-specific Plain Language standard for science and technical writing (ISO 24495-3:2026). Applied during software documentation, architecture specs, and technical analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build AI agents that automate scientific research — hypothesis generation, experiment design, data analysis, and paper writing using agentic tree search. Use when: automating research workflows, generating and testing hypotheses, building AI-powered research assistants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。