「specification」の検索結果

Construction quality control workflow automation. Manage QC inspections, track defects, generate NCRs, and ensure specification compliance throughout the project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract structured data from construction documents using LLMs. Process RFIs, submittals, contracts, specifications. Convert unstructured PDFs to structured JSON/Excel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement semantic vector search for construction data. Build AI-powered search using embeddings and vector databases (Qdrant, ChromaDB) for intelligent querying of specifications, standards, and project documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract structured data from construction PDFs. Convert specifications, BOMs, schedules, and reports from PDF to Excel/CSV/JSON. Use OCR for scanned documents and pdfplumber for native PDFs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check BIM data against IDS (Information Delivery Specification). Validate model information requirements and compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically classify and extract information from construction documents using NLP. Categorize RFIs, submittals, change orders, specifications, and contracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates phased, dependency-ordered implementation tasks from specifications. Use after spec is complete and before starting implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates Spec Driven Development by coordinating spec, plan, and task skills. Use when running the full speckit workflow from spec to implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides project ideation via Socratic questioning to produce a validated brief. Use before specification when requirements are unclear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the GeoParquet specification and bundled inspection helpers to author, validate, distribute, or safely review geospatial Parquet data, including GeoParquet 2.0 vector metadata, external writer choices, and the alpha Parquet Raster proposal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate Agent Skill design quality with an opinionated, practice-derived rubric informed by public specifications and examples. Use when reviewing, auditing, comparing, or improving SKILL.md files and skill packages. Produces evidence-backed findings, optional multi-dimensional scoring, and prioritized changes; treat the result as diagnostic guidance, not official certification or a universal standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete, production-ready REST API endpoint specifications for any system or domain the user describes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical architecture guide for building a multi-purpose consent preference center. Covers per-purpose granularity, easy withdrawal under Article 7(3), version history, audit trails, and IAB Transparency and Consent Framework v2.2 integration. Includes database schema, API design, and UI component specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for building a consent record-keeping system to demonstrate valid consent per GDPR Article 7(1). Covers required fields including timestamp, version, purpose, mechanism, and identity. Implements audit-ready consent receipts per the Kantara Initiative Consent Receipt Specification and supervisory authority expectations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement the Kantara Initiative consent receipt specification including machine-readable receipt structure, JWT-based verification mechanisms, receipt lifecycle management, and integration patterns for consent management platforms. Supports ISO/IEC 27560 consent record information structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PRD writing and product definition expert. Use when writing PRDs, user stories, acceptance criteria, or prioritizing features. Covers RICE/MoSCoW frameworks, agile requirements, and specification best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical specification and design document expert. Use when writing design docs, RFCs, ADRs, or evaluating technology choices. Covers C4 model, system design, and architecture documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for product managers. Use this skill when users ask to "create a PRD", "write product requirements", "document a feature", or need help structuring product specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a feature specification from scratch with plan-a-feature and publishes it to a user-specified Confluence location, posting the spec as a parent page and each companion artifact (decision log, team findings, technical notes) as a child page beneath it. Use when the user wants a new feature planned, designed, scoped, or specified AND posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not plan to local files only — use plan-a-feature. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not refine or stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review. Does not document already-built features to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a feature implementation plan from an existing feature specification (or equivalent context) through a facilitated team conversation. Use when the user wants to plan how to implement, build, deliver, or ship a feature that has already been specified. Does not specify what the feature should do — use plan-a-feature first. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not refine or stress-test an already-written plan — use iterative-plan-review. Runs its resolution rounds to completion and holds its questions until after they finish; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a plain-language stakeholder summary from an existing feature specification, for sharing with non-technical stakeholders before implementation kicks off. Use when the user wants to draft a stakeholder summary, executive summary, or business summary of a feature spec or PRD. Does not write the spec itself — use plan-a-feature. Does not sequence the build into phases — use plan-a-phased-build. Does not produce an implementation plan — use plan-implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Documentation-first project planning that produces implementation-ready blueprints and single-shot coding agent prompts. Generates 4 interconnected docs — SPECIFICATION.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md, TASKS.md, BRANDING.md — plus a self-contained PROMPT.md for autonomous execution by any coding agent. Includes interactive tech stack selection, design pattern recommendations, and architecture decisions with trade-off analysis. Trigger when user wants to: plan a project, create specs, architect a system, break work into tasks, choose a tech stack, get design pattern advice, generate a coding agent prompt, or do documentation-first development. Phrases: "plan my project", "spec this out", "architect", "help me plan", "what stack should I use", "generate a prompt", "break this into tasks", "project docs", "I want to build X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically repair C/C++ code violations detected by TLA+ model checking. Takes a program, TLA+ specification, and TLC counterexample trace as input, then generates minimal code modifications to eliminate the violation. Use when: (1) TLC model checker reports an invariant violation, deadlock, or temporal property failure, (2) You have a counterexample trace and need to fix the corresponding code, (3) You need to understand how a TLA+ violation maps to program-level bugs, (4) You want to validate repairs by re-running TLC. Supports safety properties (invariants), liveness properties (temporal logic), and deadlock detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。