「specs」の検索結果

Maxim Brand Intelligence — brand identity, voice architecture, visual identity systems, messaging frameworks, brand consistency enforcement. Activate for brand strategy, brand audits, brand guidelines, tone of voice, asset compliance, color palette, typography specs. Powered by Maxim behavioral science layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designer role. Reads deck.md, generates a single HTML presentation file with CSS design system + JS slide engine + per-slide content. Accepts visual references (URLs, screenshots, design specs) and extracts design signals to inform the isomorphic mapping. Use whenever the user says "design slides", "generate deck", "generate the deck", "build slides", "visual style", "reference this style", "like this design", "design", "generate slides", "visual style", "reference this style", or wants to turn an outline into actual slides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sector-specific Plain Language standard for science and technical writing (ISO 24495-3:2026). Applied during software documentation, architecture specs, and technical analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Side-by-Side Property Comparison — takes two addresses and compares across price, specs, rental income, neighborhood, and investment potential with a winner per category and overall recommendation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate "X vs Y" and "Alternative to X" SEO/CRO pages targeting competitive search intent during PRD v0.9 Go-to-Market. Triggers on requests to build comparison pages, target competitive search traffic, or when user asks "build alternatives pages", "X vs Y page", "competitor comparison page", "we're better than X page", "capture branded search", "competitive SEO". Outputs SCR-ALT-* page specs and GTM-* channel entries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a vague bug report into a VERIFIED minimal reproduction and then a failing regression test, agent-driven end to end. Covers extracting the implicit repro from a thin report (env, build, steps, data), the reproduce-minimize-isolate-capture loop, git bisect to find the introducing commit, building a deterministic minimal repro (fixed seeds, frozen time, stubbed network), writing the failing regression test BEFORE the fix (red) and confirming the fix flips it green, and writing repro evidence back into the ticket. Distinguishes flaky-not-reproducible from environment-specific. Use when: "reproduce this bug," "minimal reproduction," "repro steps," "find the commit that broke it," "git bisect," "make the repro deterministic," "write a failing test for this bug," "regression test for a defect," "can't reproduce this bug." Not for: Classifying/deduplicating/severity-routing existing failures without reproducing them — that is ai-bug-triage. Generating tests from specs rather than from a defect — that is ai-test-generation. Related: ai-bug-triage, ai-test-generation, test-reliability, systematic-debugging, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates and executes load test scripts for APIs using k6, wrk, or autocannon. Creates realistic test scenarios from OpenAPI specs, route files, or endpoint descriptions. Use when someone needs to load test, stress test, benchmark, or find the breaking point of their API. Trigger words: load test, stress test, benchmark, RPS, concurrent users, breaking point, performance test, k6, wrk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a fast 6-point quality check for technical documents (specs, design docs, READMEs). Use after editing any specification or design document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates completed work against defined acceptance criteria. Use after completing a task that has specific success criteria defined in issues, specs, or task descriptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses production readiness or audits a codebase against its specs. Supports quick static mode, deep 17-dimension audit, or single-dimension focus. Use before a production launch, after a major refactor, when inheriting a codebase, or when someone asks how done the project is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

运行代码生成并检查变更。在修改 API 规范（api-specs/ YAML）或 sandbox OpenAPI/protobuf 后使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate navigable semantic maps from PDF documents. Extracts section structure via font analysis, then runs LLM extraction per section for claims, symbols, and dependencies — all page-anchored. Produces _MAP.md (progressive disclosure), .symbols.json (definition index), .anchors.json (claim references), and a _USAGE.md snippet for CLAUDE.md. Use when analyzing papers, specs, or legal docs; when asked to "map this document", "index this PDF", "what does this paper say"; or when a coding agent needs grounded reference material from a PDF source. Analogous to tree-sitting but for prose documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create interactive data visualizations using Vega-Lite declarative JSON grammar. Supports 20+ chart types (bar, line, scatter, histogram, boxplot, grouped/stacked variations, etc.) via templates and programmatic builders. Use when users upload data for charting, request specific chart types, or mention visualizations. Produces portable JSON specs with inline data islands that work in Claude artifacts and can be adapted for production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create platform-specific social media posts for LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, and Reddit. Handles character limits, hashtag strategies, hook placement, and image specs per platform. Works from scratch, from existing content (blog, newsletter, announcement), or as a multi-platform campaign. Produces copy-paste-ready posts. Triggers: 'social media post', 'linkedin post', 'facebook post', 'instagram caption', 'reddit post', 'social posts', 'post to social', 'repurpose for social', 'social media campaign'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when turning any content into clear, professional visualizations - board slides, reports, proposals, research summaries, training materials, technical diagrams, infographics, process flows, timelines, benchmarks, waterfall charts, or data-backed visual specs for any audience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when verifying that requirements/specs/PRDs and their implementation plans match — before starting work, after a spec or plan update, or when suspecting coverage gaps, scope creep, or design drift between intent and action documents. Needs both documents; not for checking code against a spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check premium specs before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned paid-media creative system for hooks, headlines, primary text, static and motion concepts, platform specs, review pages, and test-ready variant batches. Use when producing or iterating ad creative from grounded product and audience inputs. NOT FOR: campaign budgets, bidding, or targeting (use suede-ads), statistical test design (use suede-ab-testing), or landing-page copy (use suede-copy).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a written, reviewable plan or spec produced before coding starts. Triggers on: mapping out changes without implementing, thinking through risks of upgrades or migrations, evaluating approaches before committing to one, writing specs for team review, phasing work into stages, or any request that explicitly defers coding ('don't implement yet', 'before we build'). The distinguishing signal is that the user wants a plan artifact — not implementation, not a conversational answer. MUST activates inside Claude's native plan mode to have a better planning behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, correctness, and fit. Use when the user wants judgment on code that already exists — their own changes, a teammate's patch, a PR, branch, commit, diff, staged changes, or one or more files to look over. Activate on requests like review, look over, sanity check, critique, code review, or 'is this good?' The key signal is that the user wants evaluation of existing code and its tradeoffs, not implementation, debugging, or explanation. This skill works independently, but when plans, specs, task artifacts, or prior discussion exist, use them to understand why the code exists before judging it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze production Agentforce agent behavior using session traces and Data Cloud, and manage Agent Health Monitoring (AHM) alerts. TRIGGER when: user queries STDM session data or Data Cloud trace records; investigates production agent failures, regressions, or performance issues; asks about session traces, conversation logs, or agent metrics; wants to reproduce a reported production issue in preview; runs findSessions or trace analysis queries; creates, lists, updates, or deletes an AHM data alert on an agent metric (escalation rate, deflection, etc.); asks why an alert is not firing or wants to check whether alerts have fired (notification counts, or the per-alert Incidents view). DO NOT TRIGGER when: user creates, modifies, or debugs .agent files during development (use agentforce-generate); writes or runs test specs (use agentforce-test); uses sf agent preview for local development iteration; deploys or publishes agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or running Unreal Engine tests - which test type fits (simple/complex automation tests, Automation Specs, functional tests, CQTest, Low-Level Tests, Gauntlet), naming and filters, latent tests, and the headless UnrealEditor-Cmd run with report export, exit handling and screenshot captures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。