「the」の検索結果

When you have a decision to make and want a structured workflow that picks the load-bearing questions, walks through them, reaches a call (or "wait"), and archives the rationale for future reference. Based on the 37signals Guide to Making Decisions (38 questions) plus house additions like Q39 opportunity cost ("what does saying yes displace?"). Triages to 6–8 relevant questions per decision instead of forcing the full set. Archives every decision to ~/.config/makerskills/decide/archive/ with a revisit date so you can check later whether the call was right. Triggers on "/decide," "help me decide," "should I [X]," "I need to make a decision about," "stuck on a decision," "deciding between," "go/no-go on," "what should I do about." This is both the decision-making workflow AND the decision log — making the decision is the act of logging it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert blueprint for UI themes using Theme resources, StyleBoxes, custom fonts, and theme overrides for consistent visual styling. Covers StyleBoxFlat/Texture, theme inheritance, dynamic theme switching, and font variations. Use when implementing consistent UI styling OR supporting multiple themes. Keywords Theme, StyleBox, StyleBoxFlat, add_theme_override, font, theme inheritance, dark mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start (or restart) a local Temps control plane built from this checkout, and the web dev server (`bun dev`) in `<checkout>/web`. Invoke when the user says "start temps", "restart temps", "launch the server", "kill and restart temps", or asks to bring the local server up after backend changes. Ports, database and data dir are allocated PER CHECKOUT (a "slot") so several worktrees/branches run side by side without killing each other or corrupting each other's schema — the first checkout you start in claims slot 0 (the familiar `:8080` / `:3000`); every other worktree gets its own slot and its own `temps_s<N>` database. Uses the `fast` cargo profile (release semantics, no debug symbols, parallel codegen) for quick rebuilds. Pass `split` (e.g. "start temps split", "/start-temps split") to launch the two-process proxy/console topology for testing that feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns the raw first-name field on a lead row into the name a person would actually be greeted by, so it can open an email. Triggers on "clean these first names", "first name variable", "the greeting says Hi DR MATTHEW", "strip the titles off the names", "some rows have the whole name in the first-name column", "normalize first names for the campaign". Outputs first_name_clean, one short string per row.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Names 2 other right-fit people at the prospect's own company so an email can ask "is this you or them?" without ever naming the person being emailed. Triggers on "name two other people at the company", "who else works there", "should I be talking to someone else", "colleague name variable", "other prospects line", "wrong person CTA". Outputs other_prospects, a ready-to-drop phrase like "Jeff Barg or Rob Cook".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a complete beginner's app idea into a buildable plan, then keep them oriented while they build. Use it whenever someone who has never coded wants to build or "vibe code" an app, has an idea but no idea where to start, or wants it turned into a plan, MVP scope, tech stack, user flows, or blueprint. It has three on-ramps: the full journey, a validate-only pass ("is my idea worth building", "reality-check this idea"), and a plan-only path for someone arriving with validation done ("I already validated my idea", "I have the research, just plan my MVP", "skip the research"). ALSO use it when a non-coder needs build-time basics: what Git and GitHub are, making an account, "commit and push," local vs. staging vs. production, putting an app online (deploy/ship), or keeping API keys safe. AND use it in Checkup Mode when someone who built with AI says it became a mess, the AI keeps breaking things or going in circles, they're scared to touch their code, or they ask "is my code organized" or "can you clean it up." Built for people who don't know what an API, database, or GitHub is, so reach for it when they never say "plan" or "architecture." Not for an experienced dev debugging, refactoring, or setting up CI/CD.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekdays, browser only when a source refuses to be fetched. Works the single card the standup marked next: reads the shared publishing standard and the card's specification, pulls the live result set for the primary keyword, reads the pages currently ranking, writes the body, the metadata, the internal links and the outbound authority links, generates and compresses a hero, and leaves a complete draft folder with one ready line. It never opens a publishing surface, never touches a live property, and never touches a credential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekdays. The only routine in this kit that opens a screen inside an account that can spend, and everything it does there is read. It confirms the primary conversion event still fired inside the read window before it trusts any other figure, then reads yesterday's spend, delivery, and result rows at account, campaign, ad set, and creative level and appends one row per object per day to the daily metrics ledger with the screen, the date range, and the read date beside every figure. It creates nothing, saves nothing, activates nothing, and spends nothing, unless you released the channel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs once by hand on the first day and once a month after that. On the first run it researches the business from its own public surfaces before asking anything, writes the strategy folder, seeds the launch board, builds the tailored command center, reconciles the schedule table, and registers the recurring jobs. On every monthly run it re-reads the evidence the kit produced, applies what changed, reconciles drift, and rebuilds. It holds every outbound action unless you released the channel, and it never enters a credential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly on a Wednesday, light browser lane. Turns the questions that keep coming back into the answer that only has to be written once. It reads the ticket ledger over the recurrence window, finds every theme that crossed its threshold, checks the member's own help center and the existing macros for an answer that already covers it, and writes a reusable macro and a help article draft for every theme that has neither. It publishes only where you released the channel an article, never edits a live help center page, sends only where you released the channel, spends only where you released it, and never touches a credential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly, on a Friday, read only everywhere. Scores the week from the daily metrics ledger alone, with the screen and the date range beside every number, then writes the ranked paste ready list of what to change in the account next week. Each line names one change, the exact screen, the current value, the proposed value, and the evidence row it came from. It proposes no change it cannot source, it names no action it took because it takes none, and it spends only where you released it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide real-time weather forecasts for any city worldwide. Use this skill whenever the user asks about weather, temperature, or climate conditions — including phrases like "weather in [city]", "what's the weather like", "weather forecast", "is it going to rain", "how hot is it", or any mention of checking current or upcoming weather conditions for a location. Also trigger when users ask about what to wear today, whether to bring an umbrella, or any question where weather data would help.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate genuinely beautiful, on-brand UI instead of generic "AI slop" — use whenever the user asks to build, design, style, or improve a UI, landing page, dashboard, app screen, or component, whenever a PRD/spec needs a design pass before implementation, whenever the user pastes reference images/Pinterest/Dribbble links and wants the app to look like them, or whenever the user complains the AI-generated UI looks generic, boring, cookie-cutter, or "like every other AI app." Make sure to trigger this even if the user doesn't say "design" explicitly — phrases like "make this look good", "build the frontend for X", "this looks like every other SaaS site", or "match this vibe" all qualify. Also triggers on two verbs, "study"/"extract the look of" a reference screenshot or URL, and "audit"/"review"/"why does this look AI-generated" for critiquing existing UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the turbo skill lessons that /self-improve writes into this repo's .turbo/handoff/ from other projects, apply the ones the user approves, delete the consumed handoffs, commit and push, and update the installed Turbo skills. Use when the user asks to "read .turbo/handoff and let me know what you think", "read the handoff files and let me know what you think", "review the lesson handoffs", "apply the self-improve handoffs", or "process the turbo handoffs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliberate-choice procedure for a medium-to-high-stakes engineering fork — when the first plausible solution (the instinct, the default next-token pull) would be costly to get wrong. Fires AUTONOMOUSLY: invoke proactively whenever a fork fits, never wait to be asked — mechanical triggers include a fix failing for the 2nd-3rd time, adding a dependency, schema/migration design, deleting or deprecating things others depend on, changing a public API, choosing an architecture or stack. Refuse the premature collapse: hold real options open (urge · contrarian · synthesis · out-of-box · intuitive dots · precedent · first-principles), ground each branch in at least one fact from outside the model (codebase, docs, benchmark, spike), future-model consequences (blast radius, reversibility, maintenance, pre-mortem), collapse by deliberate choice, then try to refute the winner before acting. Log the decision and rejected branches in docs/decision_logs/. Not for routine calls — a decision worth more than one forward pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bring up a REAL, visible, interactive chromium on the Kali VM that the operator logs into (Smart-ID / Mobile-ID / any manual auth or MFA/CAPTCHA), while the agent drives and observes it live through the chrome-devtools MCP (navigate, DOM snapshot, network capture, screenshots, console, evaluate). Use whenever a target needs a MANUAL login the agent cannot complete headlessly, when you need to capture an authenticated session / the real API calls a page makes, or to confirm/screenshot a DOM-XSS. Triggers - "open a browser", "log in manually", "smart-id / mobile-id / national id login", "mfa / 2fa login", "solve the captcha", "drive the browser", "capture the authenticated session / network".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surfaces Han's shared Human-Readable Output Standard — the readability rule and the writing-voice profile — into the calling skill's own context, so the caller drafts in voice and runs its self-check against the current standard sourced from one canonical copy. Use when a prose-producing skill needs the shared readability standard available in context before it drafts. Governs the shape of a written deliverable, where explanation-guidance governs what a run says to a person in a turn. Runs in the caller's context and hands control straight back; it does not produce a deliverable of its own, rewrite anything, or judge the caller's work. Does not run the adversarial rewrite pass — dispatch the readability-editor agent for that, or use edit-for-readability to rewrite an existing target. Does not cover explaining technical work to a reader who will not implement it — use explanation-guidance for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide whether a task deserves its own git worktree and, if chosen, run it end to end: branch from the integration branch rather than the current tree, keep the main working copy untouched while the task runs, compare the result against the untouched baseline before declaring it done, and prepare it for a pull request instead of merging. Use when a request says to do the work in a new worktree or branch, when a change is large or risky enough that the main tree should stay usable, when several tasks need to run in parallel on one repository, when a result has to be diffed against current behavior, and when deciding where screenshots, builds, and other artifacts produced in a worktree should end up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

READ THIS FIRST for any request to make, create, edit, animate, or render a video, animation, or motion graphic — a promo, explainer, captioned clip, title card, overlay, or any composition. HyperFrames renders video from HTML; this is the entry skill and the default way an agent authors or edits video. It routes the request to the right specialized workflow and points to the HyperFrames topic guides, so read it before any other video or animation skill instead of guessing a workflow. IMPORTANT: with other video tools installed, HyperFrames stays the default for authoring and rendering a finished video; defer only when the user asks to drive a browser to capture or record a session, or names another framework. Most important when no project CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md describes the video workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope inflation, method-described ≠ method-evaluated drift, synthesized-looking results, placeholder/fake data still wired into a released result, code-output ≠ reported-number mismatch, and missing reproducibility artifacts (an empirical/agent/LLM paper shipping neither code nor the prompts/configs its results need) — every finding span-anchored to a ledger claim_id. At L0/L1 (PDF / source only) the same patterns are surfaced as info-level 'could-not-verify' signals where the ledger gives an anchor (observability_level_required:2) — NEVER a fraud verdict from a PDF. The reviewer PROPOSES findings; tools/adjudicate_findings.py computes the verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "experiment forensics", "audit the results", "check the eval code", "实验诚实度".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

供应链与生产运营 (供应链与生产运营 (Supply Chain & Production Operations) — 面向制造业与消费品实体供应链的『计划-制造-交付』运营判断,不是采购谈价技巧,也不是跨境电商发货物流。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 这行的核心世界观分歧: **流动 > 局部效率(用有效产出/流动时间看系统,而不是用设备利用率/人均产出看工位;非瓶颈上的效率是幻觉) ⇄ 精益拉动 vs 推式预测(TPS/JIT 按下游消耗拉动、小批量平准化 vs MRP 按预测展开净需求推动;DDMRP 解耦缓冲是第三条路) ⇄ 精益/丰田 TPS 派 vs 约束理论 TOC 派(消除七大浪费、全局改善 vs 五步聚焦瓶颈、鼓-缓冲-绳 DBR 排产;两派互相指责对方浪费时间/只治标) ⇄ 变异是敌人(Deming/六西格玛/Factory Physics 的 VUT 排队论: 利用率越靠近满载排队时间越爆炸,交期长不是产能不够而是变异+高负荷) ⇄ 库存是负债 vs 库存是缓冲(会计把库存记成资产、精益视其为掩盖问题的水位、TOC 与韧性派视其为吸收变异的必要缓冲;真问题是缓冲放在哪一层而不是有没有) ⇄ 精益 JIT vs 韧性冗余(2020-2023 断链后 just-in-case、多源、近岸/友岸的回摆;精益派反驳崩的是『假精益』——单一来源+砍库存不砍变异) ⇄ 服务水平 vs 库存成本(安全库存/报童模型/ABC-XYZ 的经典取舍,牛鞭效应放大上游波动) ⇄ 成本导向压价 vs 供应商共生开发(Kraljic 分级、丰田供应商协会式长期共生 vs 年降指标与竞价) ⇄ 一个数 vs 各部门各算各的(S&OP/IBP 的本质是跨职能对齐到一套数字与一份产销计划))**; (b) 工具栈(此行的工具是『系统+方法』的混合) — ERP/MRP(SAP S/4HANA PP·MM、Oracle、用友·金蝶、Odoo、NetSuite)、APS 高级计划排程(Kinaxis RapidResponse、o9、Blue Yonder、SAP IBP、OMP、Siemens Opcenter APS)、MES/车间执行(Siemens Opcenter、Rockwell FactoryTalk、黑湖智造)、WMS/TMS、需求预测(统计模型 + Nixtla StatsForecast/Prophet、FVA 预测增值分析)、运筹优化与仿真(OR-Tools、Gurobi、Pyomo、AnyLogic、FlexSim、SimPy)、供应链风险与多级可视(Resilinc、Everstream、Interos)、分析层(SQL/Python pandas/Power BI)、以及纸笔工具(价值流图 VSM、A3、看板、标准作业票)—— 选型决策树的关键分岔是 MTS/MTO/ATO/ETO 履行模式与需求变异度,而非厂商功能清单; (c) 心智模型层 — 利特尔法则(在制品 = 产出率 × 流动时间)、瓶颈与非瓶颈、缓冲三态(库存/时间/产能缓冲)、解耦点(客户订单渗透点 CODP)、牛鞭效应、takt time 节拍与产线平衡、OEE 与六大损失、muda·mura·muri 三种浪费、自働化 jidoka 与安灯、防错 poka-yoke、SMED 快速换模换出小批量、平准化 heijunka、PDCA 与丰田改善型 Toyota Kata、DMAIC 与 Cpk 过程能力、报童模型与安全库存公式、ABC-XYZ 分级; (d) 工作流/SOP — 跑一轮月度 S&OP(需求评审→供应评审→预 S&OP→执行 S&OP)、做需求预测与预测误差复盘(MAPE/WMAPE/bias/FVA)、设定库存分级与安全库存、MRP 跑批与例外消息处理(缺料齐套与 MRP 神经质)、瓶颈识别与 DBR 排产、价值流图现状图→未来图→改善计划、新品导入 NPI 与多级 BOM/ECN 工程变更、供应商选择与开发(RFQ→审厂→APQP/PPAP→量产→年度绩效)、断料应急与交期承诺(ATP/CTP)、循环盘点与库存准确率; (e) 知识正典(en/ja 一手极厚,中译齐全) — 《目标 The Goal》Goldratt(TOC 小说体奠基)、《丰田生产方式》大野耐一、《改变世界的机器》Womack·Jones·Roos(MIT IMVP 研究)、《精益思想 Lean Thinking》Womack & Jones、《丰田模式 The Toyota Way》Liker、《工厂物理学 Factory Physics》Hopp & Spearman(排队论视角的运营科学)、《学习观察 Learning to See》Rother & Shook(VSM)、《丰田套路 Toyota Kata》Rother、Spear & Bowen 的 HBR 1999《Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System》、Lee/Padmanabhan/Whang 1997《The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains》、Ptak & Smith 的 DDMRP、Orlicky 的 MRP、Chopra & Meindl 的供应链管理教材、Deming《转危为安 Out of the Crisis》、Sheffi《The Resilient Enterprise》、ASCM/APICS 的 SCOR 参考模型与 CPIM/CSCP 知识体系; (f) 行业大佬/figures — 大野耐一(TPS 立法者)、新乡重夫(SMED/防错)、Eliyahu Goldratt(TOC 创立者)、W. Edwards Deming(变异与系统观)、James Womack & Daniel Jones(把 TPS 译成西方可学的『精益』)、Jeffrey Liker(丰田模式学术化)、Mike Rother(VSM 与改善型)、Wallace Hopp & Mark Spearman(工厂物理学)、Hau Lee(斯坦福,牛鞭效应与 Triple-A 供应链)、Yossi Sheffi(MIT,韧性)、Carol Ptak & Chad Smith(DDMRP)、David Simchi-Levi(MIT,风险敞口指数)、Steven Spear(TPS 的 DNA)、以及中文圈的供应链实务作者(刘宝红等); (g) 争议/批判(必须保留不洗白) — JIT 是不是 2021 全球断链的元凶(精益派反驳:崩的是单一来源+砍库存不砍变异的『假精益』);西方学精益的高失败率(只搬工具不搬思维,精益在很多工厂沦为裁员的代号);六西格玛黑带官僚化与扼杀创新之争;TOC 派与精益派互相攻击(Goldratt 讽刺精益是等浪费自己浮现);预测无用论(需求驱动派说预测必然错、要靠缓冲吸收)vs 统计预测派;控制塔/数字孪生/AI 预测的过度承诺与高项目失败率;中国制造的年降与内卷式压价 vs 供应商共生;近岸·友岸外包是真实产能转移还是政治叙事; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — **精益/TPS 派(丰田血统:大野-新乡→Womack/Jones/Liker/Rother,信全局消除浪费与人的改善能力)** vs **约束理论 TOC 派(Goldratt:系统产出只由瓶颈决定,聚焦五步、DBR、缓冲管理)** vs **统计质量/六西格玛派(Deming-Juran-Shewhart→GE/Motorola,信减少变异与过程能力)** vs **运营科学/工厂物理学派(Hopp & Spearman:用排队论与数学定律解释,认为精益与 TOC 都是特例)** vs **需求驱动/DDMRP 派(Ptak & Smith:预测不可靠,靠战略解耦缓冲)** vs **韧性/风险派(Sheffi、Simchi-Levi:效率之外必须为断链设计)**。不含: 跨境电商卖家的发货与头程物流(已由 cross-border-ecommerce 覆盖)、纯采购的商务谈判技巧、企业级 ERP 的代码实施与二次开发、通用项目管理。) Master OS — automated mastery of 供应链与生产运营 (Supply Chain & Production Operations) — 面向制造业与消费品实体供应链的『计划-制造-交付』运营判断,不是采购谈价技巧,也不是跨境电商发货物流。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 这行的核心世界观分歧: **流动 > 局部效率(用有效产出/流动时间看系统,而不是用设备利用率/人均产出看工位;非瓶颈上的效率是幻觉) ⇄ 精益拉动 vs 推式预测(TPS/JIT 按下游消耗拉动、小批量平准化 vs MRP 按预测展开净需求推动;DDMRP 解耦缓冲是第三条路) ⇄ 精益/丰田 TPS 派 vs 约束理论 TOC 派(消除七大浪费、全局改善 vs 五步聚焦瓶颈、鼓-缓冲-绳 DBR 排产;两派互相指责对方浪费时间/只治标) ⇄ 变异是敌人(Deming/六西格玛/Factory Physics 的 VUT 排队论: 利用率越靠近满载排队时间越爆炸,交期长不是产能不够而是变异+高负荷) ⇄ 库存是负债 vs 库存是缓冲(会计把库存记成资产、精益视其为掩盖问题的水位、TOC 与韧性派视其为吸收变异的必要缓冲;真问题是缓冲放在哪一层而不是有没有) ⇄ 精益 JIT vs 韧性冗余(2020-2023 断链后

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a long swarm of hundreds to thousands of cheap headless coding workers that drive a large failing-test backlog to green. Failures are clustered by signature, each worker fixes one cluster in its own git worktree, a serial no-regression merge gate lands the fixes, the loop resumes across restarts for hours, and it federates across sibling sessions over git branches when one container's CPU is not enough. Use for "fix these thousands of failing tests with a Haiku swarm", "drive the test suite to green with hundreds of agents", "build this compiler or interpreter against a conformance suite", "launch, relaunch or check in on the swarm loop", "the swarm is stuck, idle or rejecting everything", "parallel agents fixing tests keep hitting merge conflicts and regressions", "add sibling containers to the swarm", or "compare models on the tail the swarm could not fix". Ships the harness, a per-project TOML config, a fake-worker selftest, check-in signals and the 2026-10-12 haiku-cc failure catalogue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assign items to a CLOSED label vocabulary that is too large to put in a prompt — product taxonomies, category hierarchies, tag vocabularies, routing tables, ICD/SIC-style code lists. A cheap model writes the label it thinks the vocabulary would use, and an embedder snaps that writing onto the nearest legal value, so the schema is never transmitted and the output is always in-vocabulary. Use for "classify these into our taxonomy", "tag these against the existing tag list", "map these queries to categories", "the enum is too big to send", or a Literal/enum that hits a provider cap. NOT for a vocabulary that fits in a prompt — structured output measured 0.701 acc@1 there against this pattern's 0.564. NOT for open-ended labelling with no fixed vocabulary, and not for ranked retrieval over documents (bm25).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。