「trace」の検索結果

Pre-breach impact analysis: inventories sensitive data (PII, PHI, PCI-DSS, credentials), traces data flows, scores exposure vectors, and produces a regulatory blast radius report with fine ranges sourced verbatim from GDPR Art. 83, CCPA § 1798.155(a), and HIPAA 45 CFR § 160.404. Cost benchmarks from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report (annually updated). All citations in references/SOURCES.md for verification. Use when asked: "assess breach impact", "what data could be exposed", "calculate blast radius", "data exposure analysis", "how bad would a breach be", "quantify data risk", "sensitive data inventory", "data flow security audit", "pre-breach assessment", "worst-case breach scenario", "breach readiness", "data risk report", "/data-breach-blast-radius". For any stack handling user data, health records, or financial information. Output labels law-sourced figures (exact) vs heuristic estimates (planning only). Does not replace legal counsel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimizes, improves, and debugs LLM prompts using production trace data, evaluations, and annotations. Extracts prompts from spans, gathers performance signal, and runs a data-driven optimization loop using the ax CLI. Use when the user mentions optimize prompt, improve prompt, make AI respond better, improve output quality, prompt engineering, prompt tuning, or system prompt improvement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce output quality, evidence verification, and quality gates across security audits. Use this skill when you perform SAST, SCA, threat modeling, or security code reviews. Use this skill to verify code locations and taint traces for all findings. Use this skill to prevent the suppression of valid security findings. Use this skill to evaluate reports against quality thresholds (score ≥ 8/10) before delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-first at pre-agreed seams — one test, one implementation, tracer-bullet red/green; independent expected values; substitutions only at the seam's boundary class; launch Phase 4 reference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose the current OMC session or repo state using logs, traces, state, and focused reproduction

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-session environment retrospective driven by OMC's own instrumentation — trace timelines, friction reports, logs, and plan notepads. Every finding lands on the surface that owns the fix (deterministic check, steering volume, tooling, or information access); nothing is written without user approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Root-cause a reconciliation break to its source transaction or posting — follow the audit trail from the break row back to the originating entry on each side and state what differs and why. Use after gl-recon has classified a break.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified LLM torch-profiler triage skill for `sglang`, `vllm`, `TensorRT-LLM`, and `TokenSpeed`. Use it to inspect an existing `trace.json(.gz)` or profile directory, or to drive live profiling against a running server when supported and return one three-table report with kernel, overlap-opportunity, and fuse-pattern tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before opening a PR, or whenever asked to self-review a diffusers contribution. Applies the same rubric as the `@claude` CI (checks the diff against references/review-rules.md, traces call paths for dead code). Reports findings grouped by severity, flagging what to fix before submitting (blocking issues + dead code) vs what to leave for the actual review. Report-only — does not edit files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Traces ransomware cryptocurrency payment flows using blockchain analysis tools such as Chainalysis Reactor, WalletExplorer, and blockchain.com APIs, identifying wallet clusters and tracking fund movement through mixers and exchanges to support law enforcement attribution. Use when tracing ransomware bitcoin payments, performing cryptocurrency wallet forensics, or gathering blockchain threat intelligence on extortion payments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parse and analyze email headers (Received chain, Return-Path, Message-ID) to trace the true origin of a phishing email and validate SPF, DKIM, and DMARC results to confirm or rule out sender spoofing. Use when triaging a suspicious or reported email, investigating a phishing incident, or verifying whether a message's sender domain was spoofed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open-source AI observability platform for LLM tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications with detailed traces, running evaluations on datasets, or monitoring production AI systems with real-time insights.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with cognee's session memory or improve() — storing conversation turns, agent traces and feedback with session_id, bridging sessions into the permanent graph, reading an ImproveResult, understanding why an improve stage was skipped, already_completed or lock_held, or tuning the IMPROVE_* settings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Import AI-assistant chat exports (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity) and agent session transcripts into the brain as one dated page per conversation under conversations/, validate each page against the native conversation parser, extract facts via the native conversation-facts flow, and keep the archive gap-free with a detect-and-backfill loop. Then answer archive questions: "when did I first discuss X", trace how an idea evolved across past conversations, pull a specific thread.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trace one idea's evolution through the brain: first mention, best articulation, related concepts, reversals, contradictions, abandoned branches, and the current live version. Use for single-idea conceptual lineage, not broad concept-map synthesis or structured entity metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user corrects a factual error, root-cause it immediately. Don't just note the correction — trace the error to its source, fix the source, and prevent recurrence. Every factual error is either a data error (bad brain page, bad memory file, bad rendered SOUL/USER identity, bad facts row) or a hallucination (LLM confabulated from partial signals).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically fix broken OpenCLI adapters when commands fail. Load this skill when an opencli command fails — it guides you through collecting a trace artifact, patching the adapter, retrying, and filing an upstream GitHub issue after a verified fix. Works with any AI agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured debugging session — reproduce, isolate, diagnose, and fix. Trigger with an error message or stack trace, "this works in staging but not prod", "something broke after the deploy", or when behavior diverges from expected and the cause isn't obvious.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trace a file, function, or line back to the agent session that produced its current commit. Use when the user asks "why is this code here", "what was the agent doing when this changed", "who wrote this", or wants context on a specific location in the codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a GitHub issue or reported bug the way a seasoned maintainer would — form an independent model before reading the thread's theories, trace the mechanism and history, verify the diagnosis, and return a concise briefing with a verdict and fix direction. Use for triage, root-cause analysis, or re-investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Smoke test Mastra projects locally or deploy to staging/production. Tests Studio UI, agents, tools, workflows, traces, memory, and more. Supports both local development and cloud deployments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage a Factory work item's issue — trace history, understand architecture, diagnose root cause, then advance the stage

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use early when debugging a medium or hard bug, especially when tests alone may not reveal the real runtime failure. Trigger this before extended TDD iteration when a bug involves runtime state, ordering, persistence, streaming, concurrency, UI/manual reproduction, external services, or when a red or newly passing test may not model the real issue. Skip only when the root cause is already directly proven by a stack trace or deterministic test that exercises the real runtime path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after a Codex or Claude Code feature has been implemented in Qwen Code to run the selected reference agent and Qwen Code under the same scenario, capture HTTP and terminal traces, compare request bodies, tool/function schemas, outputs, and iterate until the reproduced behavior is close enough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。